Cargando…

Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective

PURPOSE: Sonographic fetal weight (FW) estimation to detect macrosomic fetuses is an essential part of everyday routine work in obstetrics departments. Most of the commonly used weight estimation formulas underestimate FW when the actual birth weight (BW) exceeds 4000 g. One of the best-established...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weiss, Christoph, Oppelt, Peter, Mayer, Richard Bernhard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4917-z
_version_ 1783372099439558656
author Weiss, Christoph
Oppelt, Peter
Mayer, Richard Bernhard
author_facet Weiss, Christoph
Oppelt, Peter
Mayer, Richard Bernhard
author_sort Weiss, Christoph
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Sonographic fetal weight (FW) estimation to detect macrosomic fetuses is an essential part of everyday routine work in obstetrics departments. Most of the commonly used weight estimation formulas underestimate FW when the actual birth weight (BW) exceeds 4000 g. One of the best-established weight estimation formulas is the Hadlock formula. In an effort to improve the detection rates of macrosomic infants, Hart et al. published a specially designed formula including maternal weight at booking. The usefulness of the Hart formula was tested. METHODS: Retrospective study of 3304 singleton pregnancies, birth weight ≥ 3500 g. The accuracy of the Hadlock and Hart formula were tested. A subgroup analysis examined the influence of the maternal weight. The Chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variation were carried out. For all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall percentages of births falling within ± 5% and ± 10% of the BW using the Hadlock formula were 27% and 53%, respectively. Using the Hart formula, 24% and 54% were identified within these levels. With the Hart formula, 94% of all weight estimations fall within 4200 g ± 5% and nearly 100% fall within 4200 g ± 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the Hart formula results in an overestimation of fetal weight in neonates with a birth weight < 4000 g and fails to identify high-risk fetuses. We, therefore, do not consider Hart’s formula to be of clinical relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6244680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62446802018-12-04 Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective Weiss, Christoph Oppelt, Peter Mayer, Richard Bernhard Arch Gynecol Obstet Maternal-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: Sonographic fetal weight (FW) estimation to detect macrosomic fetuses is an essential part of everyday routine work in obstetrics departments. Most of the commonly used weight estimation formulas underestimate FW when the actual birth weight (BW) exceeds 4000 g. One of the best-established weight estimation formulas is the Hadlock formula. In an effort to improve the detection rates of macrosomic infants, Hart et al. published a specially designed formula including maternal weight at booking. The usefulness of the Hart formula was tested. METHODS: Retrospective study of 3304 singleton pregnancies, birth weight ≥ 3500 g. The accuracy of the Hadlock and Hart formula were tested. A subgroup analysis examined the influence of the maternal weight. The Chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variation were carried out. For all analyses, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The overall percentages of births falling within ± 5% and ± 10% of the BW using the Hadlock formula were 27% and 53%, respectively. Using the Hart formula, 24% and 54% were identified within these levels. With the Hart formula, 94% of all weight estimations fall within 4200 g ± 5% and nearly 100% fall within 4200 g ± 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the Hart formula results in an overestimation of fetal weight in neonates with a birth weight < 4000 g and fails to identify high-risk fetuses. We, therefore, do not consider Hart’s formula to be of clinical relevance. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-10-04 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244680/ /pubmed/30284620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4917-z Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Weiss, Christoph
Oppelt, Peter
Mayer, Richard Bernhard
Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title_full Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title_fullStr Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title_full_unstemmed Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title_short Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective
title_sort disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the hart formula from a clinical perspective
topic Maternal-Fetal Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30284620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4917-z
work_keys_str_mv AT weisschristoph disadvantagesofaweightestimationformulaformacrosomicfetusesthehartformulafromaclinicalperspective
AT oppeltpeter disadvantagesofaweightestimationformulaformacrosomicfetusesthehartformulafromaclinicalperspective
AT mayerrichardbernhard disadvantagesofaweightestimationformulaformacrosomicfetusesthehartformulafromaclinicalperspective