Cargando…
Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study
PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women who received vaginal progesterone due to short cervical length or to prevent recurrent preterm birth. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 190 women with singleton pregnancies at risk for preter...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4895-1 |
_version_ | 1783372100166221824 |
---|---|
author | Rosta, Klara Ott, Johannes Kelemen, Fanni Temsch, Wilhelm Lahner, Tobias Reischer, Theresa Helmer, Hanns Somogyi, Aniko |
author_facet | Rosta, Klara Ott, Johannes Kelemen, Fanni Temsch, Wilhelm Lahner, Tobias Reischer, Theresa Helmer, Hanns Somogyi, Aniko |
author_sort | Rosta, Klara |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women who received vaginal progesterone due to short cervical length or to prevent recurrent preterm birth. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 190 women with singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth who received vaginal natural progesterone (200 mg daily between gestational weeks 16 + 0 and 36 + 0) for a minimum of 4 weeks and delivered > 28 weeks. The control group consisted of 242 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients without progesterone administration. Data were acquired from a database containing prospectively collected information. Patients with pre-existing diabetes, and conception after in vitro fertilisation procedure were excluded. RESULTS: The incidence of GDM did not differ significantly between the progesterone-treated and the control group (14.7% vs. 16.9%, respectively; p = 0.597). In a binary regression model, patients with higher pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 1.1; p = 0.006), and those with a family history of diabetes had a higher risk for GDM development (OR 1.8; p = 0.040), whereas vaginal progesterone treatment had no significant influence (p = 0.580). CONCLUSION: The use of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of recurrent preterm delivery and in women with a short cervix does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of GDM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6244685 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62446852018-12-04 Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study Rosta, Klara Ott, Johannes Kelemen, Fanni Temsch, Wilhelm Lahner, Tobias Reischer, Theresa Helmer, Hanns Somogyi, Aniko Arch Gynecol Obstet Maternal-Fetal Medicine PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) in pregnant women who received vaginal progesterone due to short cervical length or to prevent recurrent preterm birth. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we included 190 women with singleton pregnancies at risk for preterm birth who received vaginal natural progesterone (200 mg daily between gestational weeks 16 + 0 and 36 + 0) for a minimum of 4 weeks and delivered > 28 weeks. The control group consisted of 242 age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched patients without progesterone administration. Data were acquired from a database containing prospectively collected information. Patients with pre-existing diabetes, and conception after in vitro fertilisation procedure were excluded. RESULTS: The incidence of GDM did not differ significantly between the progesterone-treated and the control group (14.7% vs. 16.9%, respectively; p = 0.597). In a binary regression model, patients with higher pre-pregnancy BMI (OR 1.1; p = 0.006), and those with a family history of diabetes had a higher risk for GDM development (OR 1.8; p = 0.040), whereas vaginal progesterone treatment had no significant influence (p = 0.580). CONCLUSION: The use of vaginal progesterone for the prevention of recurrent preterm delivery and in women with a short cervix does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of GDM. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-09-17 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244685/ /pubmed/30225687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4895-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Maternal-Fetal Medicine Rosta, Klara Ott, Johannes Kelemen, Fanni Temsch, Wilhelm Lahner, Tobias Reischer, Theresa Helmer, Hanns Somogyi, Aniko Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title | Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title_full | Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title_fullStr | Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title_short | Is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? A retrospective case–control study |
title_sort | is vaginal progesterone treatment associated with the development of gestational diabetes? a retrospective case–control study |
topic | Maternal-Fetal Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30225687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-018-4895-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rostaklara isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT ottjohannes isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT kelemenfanni isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT temschwilhelm isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT lahnertobias isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT reischertheresa isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT helmerhanns isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT somogyianiko isvaginalprogesteronetreatmentassociatedwiththedevelopmentofgestationaldiabetesaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy |