Cargando…
A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodolog...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer London
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5 |
_version_ | 1783372111910273024 |
---|---|
author | Durnea, Constantin M. Pergialiotis, Vasilios Duffy, James M. N. Bergstrom, Lina Elfituri, Abdullatif Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. |
author_facet | Durnea, Constantin M. Pergialiotis, Vasilios Duffy, James M. N. Bergstrom, Lina Elfituri, Abdullatif Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. |
author_sort | Durnea, Constantin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality. METHODS: We searched the bibliographical databases from inception to October 2017. Two researchers independently selected studies and assessed study characteristics, methodological quality (Jadad criteria; range 1–5), and outcome reporting quality Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) criteria; range 1–6], and extracted relevant data. We used a multivariate linear regression to assess associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables. RESULTS: Eighty publications reporting data from 10,924 participants were included. Seventeen different surgical interventions were evaluated. One hundred different outcomes and 112 outcome measures were reported. Outcomes were inconsistently reported across trials; for example, 43 trials reported anatomical treatment success rates (12 outcome measures), 25 trials reported quality of life (15 outcome measures) and eight trials reported postoperative pain (seven outcome measures). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.412; P = 0.018). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with impact factor (β = 0.078; P = 0.306), year of publication (β = 0.149; P = 0.295), study size (β = 0.008; P = 0.961) and commercial funding (β = −0.013; P = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse trials report many different outcomes and outcome measures and often neglect to report important safety outcomes. Developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set will help address these issues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6244754 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer London |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62447542018-12-04 A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set Durnea, Constantin M. Pergialiotis, Vasilios Duffy, James M. N. Bergstrom, Lina Elfituri, Abdullatif Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. Int Urogynecol J Review Article INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality. METHODS: We searched the bibliographical databases from inception to October 2017. Two researchers independently selected studies and assessed study characteristics, methodological quality (Jadad criteria; range 1–5), and outcome reporting quality Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) criteria; range 1–6], and extracted relevant data. We used a multivariate linear regression to assess associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables. RESULTS: Eighty publications reporting data from 10,924 participants were included. Seventeen different surgical interventions were evaluated. One hundred different outcomes and 112 outcome measures were reported. Outcomes were inconsistently reported across trials; for example, 43 trials reported anatomical treatment success rates (12 outcome measures), 25 trials reported quality of life (15 outcome measures) and eight trials reported postoperative pain (seven outcome measures). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.412; P = 0.018). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with impact factor (β = 0.078; P = 0.306), year of publication (β = 0.149; P = 0.295), study size (β = 0.008; P = 0.961) and commercial funding (β = −0.013; P = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse trials report many different outcomes and outcome measures and often neglect to report important safety outcomes. Developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set will help address these issues. Springer London 2018-10-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244754/ /pubmed/30350116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Durnea, Constantin M. Pergialiotis, Vasilios Duffy, James M. N. Bergstrom, Lina Elfituri, Abdullatif Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title | A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title_full | A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title_fullStr | A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title_short | A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
title_sort | systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244754/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT durneaconstantinm asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT pergialiotisvasilios asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT duffyjamesmn asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT bergstromlina asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT elfituriabdullatif asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT doumouchtsisstergiosk asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT durneaconstantinm systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT pergialiotisvasilios systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT duffyjamesmn systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT bergstromlina systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT elfituriabdullatif systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT doumouchtsisstergiosk systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset AT systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset |