Cargando…

A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set

INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durnea, Constantin M., Pergialiotis, Vasilios, Duffy, James M. N., Bergstrom, Lina, Elfituri, Abdullatif, Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5
_version_ 1783372111910273024
author Durnea, Constantin M.
Pergialiotis, Vasilios
Duffy, James M. N.
Bergstrom, Lina
Elfituri, Abdullatif
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
author_facet Durnea, Constantin M.
Pergialiotis, Vasilios
Duffy, James M. N.
Bergstrom, Lina
Elfituri, Abdullatif
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
author_sort Durnea, Constantin M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality. METHODS: We searched the bibliographical databases from inception to October 2017. Two researchers independently selected studies and assessed study characteristics, methodological quality (Jadad criteria; range 1–5), and outcome reporting quality Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) criteria; range 1–6], and extracted relevant data. We used a multivariate linear regression to assess associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables. RESULTS: Eighty publications reporting data from 10,924 participants were included. Seventeen different surgical interventions were evaluated. One hundred different outcomes and 112 outcome measures were reported. Outcomes were inconsistently reported across trials; for example, 43 trials reported anatomical treatment success rates (12 outcome measures), 25 trials reported quality of life (15 outcome measures) and eight trials reported postoperative pain (seven outcome measures). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.412; P = 0.018). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with impact factor (β = 0.078; P = 0.306), year of publication (β = 0.149; P = 0.295), study size (β = 0.008; P = 0.961) and commercial funding (β = −0.013; P = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse trials report many different outcomes and outcome measures and often neglect to report important safety outcomes. Developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set will help address these issues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6244754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62447542018-12-04 A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set Durnea, Constantin M. Pergialiotis, Vasilios Duffy, James M. N. Bergstrom, Lina Elfituri, Abdullatif Doumouchtsis, Stergios K. Int Urogynecol J Review Article INTRODUCTION: We assessed outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse and explored the relationships between outcome reporting quality with journal impact factor, year of publication, and methodological quality. METHODS: We searched the bibliographical databases from inception to October 2017. Two researchers independently selected studies and assessed study characteristics, methodological quality (Jadad criteria; range 1–5), and outcome reporting quality Management of Otitis Media with Effusion in Cleft Palate (MOMENT) criteria; range 1–6], and extracted relevant data. We used a multivariate linear regression to assess associations between outcome reporting quality and other variables. RESULTS: Eighty publications reporting data from 10,924 participants were included. Seventeen different surgical interventions were evaluated. One hundred different outcomes and 112 outcome measures were reported. Outcomes were inconsistently reported across trials; for example, 43 trials reported anatomical treatment success rates (12 outcome measures), 25 trials reported quality of life (15 outcome measures) and eight trials reported postoperative pain (seven outcome measures). Multivariate linear regression demonstrated a relationship between outcome reporting quality with methodological quality (β = 0.412; P = 0.018). No relationship was demonstrated between outcome reporting quality with impact factor (β = 0.078; P = 0.306), year of publication (β = 0.149; P = 0.295), study size (β = 0.008; P = 0.961) and commercial funding (β = −0.013; P = 0.918). CONCLUSIONS: Anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse trials report many different outcomes and outcome measures and often neglect to report important safety outcomes. Developing, disseminating and implementing a core outcome set will help address these issues. Springer London 2018-10-22 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244754/ /pubmed/30350116 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Durnea, Constantin M.
Pergialiotis, Vasilios
Duffy, James M. N.
Bergstrom, Lina
Elfituri, Abdullatif
Doumouchtsis, Stergios K.
A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title_full A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title_fullStr A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title_short A systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
title_sort systematic review of outcome and outcome-measure reporting in randomised trials evaluating surgical interventions for anterior-compartment vaginal prolapse: a call to action to develop a core outcome set
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350116
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-018-3781-5
work_keys_str_mv AT durneaconstantinm asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT pergialiotisvasilios asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT duffyjamesmn asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT bergstromlina asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT elfituriabdullatif asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT doumouchtsisstergiosk asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT asystematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT durneaconstantinm systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT pergialiotisvasilios systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT duffyjamesmn systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT bergstromlina systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT elfituriabdullatif systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT doumouchtsisstergiosk systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset
AT systematicreviewofoutcomeandoutcomemeasurereportinginrandomisedtrialsevaluatingsurgicalinterventionsforanteriorcompartmentvaginalprolapseacalltoactiontodevelopacoreoutcomeset