Cargando…
Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer
PURPOSE: Overlooking other medical conditions during cancer treatment and follow-up could result in excess morbidity and mortality, thereby undermining gains associated with early detection and improved treatment of cancer. We compared the quality of care for diabetes patients subsequently diagnosed...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30291561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0717-5 |
_version_ | 1783372140933808128 |
---|---|
author | Griffiths, Robert I. McFadden, Emily C. Stevens, Richard J. Valderas, Jose M. Lavery, Bernadette A. Khan, Nada F. Keating, Nancy L. Bankhead, Clare R. |
author_facet | Griffiths, Robert I. McFadden, Emily C. Stevens, Richard J. Valderas, Jose M. Lavery, Bernadette A. Khan, Nada F. Keating, Nancy L. Bankhead, Clare R. |
author_sort | Griffiths, Robert I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Overlooking other medical conditions during cancer treatment and follow-up could result in excess morbidity and mortality, thereby undermining gains associated with early detection and improved treatment of cancer. We compared the quality of care for diabetes patients subsequently diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer to matched, diabetic non-cancer controls. METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study using primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, United Kingdom. Patients with pre-existing diabetes were followed for up to 5 years after cancer diagnosis, or after an assigned index date (non-cancer controls). Quality of diabetes care was estimated based on Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators. Mixed effects logistic regression analyses were used to compare the unadjusted and adjusted odds of meeting quality measures between cancer patients and controls, overall and stratified by type of cancer. RESULTS: 3382 cancer patients and 11,135 controls contributed 44,507 person-years of follow-up. In adjusted analyses, cancer patients were less likely to meet five of 14 quality measures, including: total cholesterol ≤ 5 mmol/L (odds ratio [OR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.90); glycosylated hemoglobin ≤ 59 mmol/mol (adjusted OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70–0.85); and albumin creatinine ratio testing (adjusted OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75–0.91). However, cancer patients were as likely as their matched controls to meet quality measures for other diabetes services, including retinal screening, foot examination, and dietary review. CONCLUSIONS: Although in the short-term, cancer patients were less likely to achieve target thresholds for cholesterol and HbA1c, they continued to receive high-quality diabetes primary care throughout 5 years post diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings are important for cancer survivors with pre-existing diabetes because they indicate that high-quality diabetes care is maintained throughout the continuum of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-018-0717-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6244927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62449272018-12-04 Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer Griffiths, Robert I. McFadden, Emily C. Stevens, Richard J. Valderas, Jose M. Lavery, Bernadette A. Khan, Nada F. Keating, Nancy L. Bankhead, Clare R. J Cancer Surviv Article PURPOSE: Overlooking other medical conditions during cancer treatment and follow-up could result in excess morbidity and mortality, thereby undermining gains associated with early detection and improved treatment of cancer. We compared the quality of care for diabetes patients subsequently diagnosed with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer to matched, diabetic non-cancer controls. METHODS: Longitudinal cohort study using primary care records from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, United Kingdom. Patients with pre-existing diabetes were followed for up to 5 years after cancer diagnosis, or after an assigned index date (non-cancer controls). Quality of diabetes care was estimated based on Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators. Mixed effects logistic regression analyses were used to compare the unadjusted and adjusted odds of meeting quality measures between cancer patients and controls, overall and stratified by type of cancer. RESULTS: 3382 cancer patients and 11,135 controls contributed 44,507 person-years of follow-up. In adjusted analyses, cancer patients were less likely to meet five of 14 quality measures, including: total cholesterol ≤ 5 mmol/L (odds ratio [OR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75–0.90); glycosylated hemoglobin ≤ 59 mmol/mol (adjusted OR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70–0.85); and albumin creatinine ratio testing (adjusted OR = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.75–0.91). However, cancer patients were as likely as their matched controls to meet quality measures for other diabetes services, including retinal screening, foot examination, and dietary review. CONCLUSIONS: Although in the short-term, cancer patients were less likely to achieve target thresholds for cholesterol and HbA1c, they continued to receive high-quality diabetes primary care throughout 5 years post diagnosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: These findings are important for cancer survivors with pre-existing diabetes because they indicate that high-quality diabetes care is maintained throughout the continuum of cancer diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11764-018-0717-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2018-10-06 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6244927/ /pubmed/30291561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0717-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Griffiths, Robert I. McFadden, Emily C. Stevens, Richard J. Valderas, Jose M. Lavery, Bernadette A. Khan, Nada F. Keating, Nancy L. Bankhead, Clare R. Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title | Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title_full | Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title_short | Quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
title_sort | quality of diabetes care in breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6244927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30291561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11764-018-0717-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT griffithsroberti qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT mcfaddenemilyc qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT stevensrichardj qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT valderasjosem qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT laverybernadettea qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT khannadaf qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT keatingnancyl qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer AT bankheadclarer qualityofdiabetescareinbreastcolorectalandprostatecancer |