Cargando…
Reproducible research practices, transparency, and open access data in the biomedical literature, 2015–2017
Currently, there is a growing interest in ensuring the transparency and reproducibility of the published scientific literature. According to a previous evaluation of 441 biomedical journals articles published in 2000–2014, the biomedical literature largely lacked transparency in important dimensions...
Autores principales: | Wallach, Joshua D., Boyack, Kevin W., Ioannidis, John P. A. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245499/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30457984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2006930 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
por: Serghiou, Stylianos, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Reproducible Research Practices and Transparency across the Biomedical Literature
por: Iqbal, Shareen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014–2017)
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014–2017)
por: Hardwicke, Tom E., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Research in the biomedical sciences: Transparent and reproducible
por: Adithan, Chandrasekaran
Publicado: (2018)