Cargando…

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

BACKGROUND: Scoping reviews are a relatively new approach to evidence synthesis and currently there exists little guidance regarding the decision to choose between a systematic review or scoping review approach when synthesising evidence. The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Munn, Zachary, Peters, Micah D. J., Stern, Cindy, Tufanaru, Catalin, McArthur, Alexa, Aromataris, Edoardo
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Debate
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453902 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Ejemplares similares

What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences
por: Munn, Zachary, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Characteristics of Indigenous primary health care service delivery models: a systematic scoping review
por: Harfield, Stephen G., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A scoping review of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health promotion programs focused on modifying chronic disease risk factors
por: Canuto, Karla J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies
por: Cooper, Chris, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review
por: Austin, Elizabeth E., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
por: Levac, Danielle, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders
por: Loke, Alice Yuen, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The Pandora’s Box of Evidence Synthesis and the case for a living Evidence Synthesis Taxonomy
por: Munn, Zachary, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
por: Barker, Timothy Hugh, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Using conversation analysis to inform role play and simulated interaction in communications skills training for healthcare professionals: identifying avenues for further development through a scoping review
por: Pilnick, Alison, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Choosing sensitivity analyses for randomised trials: principles
por: Morris, Tim P, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Do systematic reviews on pediatric topics need special methodological considerations?
por: Farid-Kapadia, Mufiza, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Scoping implementation science for the beginner: locating yourself on the “subway line” of translational research
por: Lane-Fall, Meghan B., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Choosing a control intervention for a randomised clinical trial
por: Mann, Howard, et al.
Publicado: (2003)

Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
por: Iannizzi, Claire, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Artificial intelligence guidance of advanced heart failure therapies: A systematic scoping review
por: Al-Ani, Mohammad A., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Guidance for management competency identification and development in the health context: a systematic scoping review
por: Kakemam, Edris, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Is breastfeeding really invisible, or did the health care system just choose not to notice it?
por: Mulford, Chris
Publicado: (2008)

Translating academic research into guidance to support healthcare improvement: how should guidance development be reported?
por: Turner, Simon, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Policy responses to problematic video game use: A systematic review of current measures and future possibilities
por: Király, Orsolya, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics
por: Pollock, Danielle, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework
por: Daudt, Helena ML, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Palliative psychiatry for severe persistent mental illness as a new approach to psychiatry? Definition, scope, benefits, and risks
por: Trachsel, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Choosing Scope Over Focus
por: D'Aveni, Richard
Publicado: (2017)

Bubble effect: including internet search engines in systematic reviews introduces selection bias and impedes scientific reproducibility
por: Ćurković, Marko, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Supporting a definition of predatory publishing
por: Aromataris, Edoardo, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Trends in guideline implementation: an updated scoping review
por: Peters, Sanne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Of apples and oranges: Lessons learned from the preparation of research protocols for systematic reviews exploring the effectiveness of Specialist Palliative Care
por: Gaertner, Jan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Use and uptake of web-based therapeutic interventions amongst Indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the United States of America and Canada: a scoping review
por: Reilly, Rachel, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review
por: Spencer, Angela J., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
por: Pollock, Alex, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Clarifying the distinction between case series and cohort studies in systematic reviews of comparative studies: potential impact on body of evidence and workload
por: Mathes, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Guidance for reporting outcomes in clinical trials: scoping review protocol
por: Butcher, Nancy J, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A systematic tale of two differing reviews: evaluating the evidence on public and private sector quality of primary care in low and middle income countries
por: Coarasa, Jorge, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

The authors reply
por: de Castro, Inês Rugani Ribeiro, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Predatory conferences: a systematic scoping review
por: Godskesen, Tove, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Multimorbidity in bronchiectasis: a systematic scoping review
por: Marsland, Imogen, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Artificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review
por: Morrow, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

How to tackle the conundrum of quality appraisal in systematic reviews of normative literature/information? Analysing the problems of three possible strategies (translation of a German paper)
por: Mertz, Marcel
Publicado: (2019)

Pharmacist Provided Spirometry Services: A Scoping Review
por: Valentino, Alexa Sevin, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_88u6ugqe6m979n80sm6oubciai