Cargando…

Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults

BACKGROUND: Approximately 70,000 to 75,000 proximal femoral fracture repairs take place in the UK each year. Hemiarthroplasty is the preferred treatment for adults aged over 60 years. Postoperative infection affects up to 3% of patients and is the single most common reason for early return to theatr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kümin, Michelle, Harper, Christopher Mark, Reed, Mike, Bremner, Stephen, Perry, Nicky, Scarborough, Matthew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3011-y
_version_ 1783372287187091456
author Kümin, Michelle
Harper, Christopher Mark
Reed, Mike
Bremner, Stephen
Perry, Nicky
Scarborough, Matthew
author_facet Kümin, Michelle
Harper, Christopher Mark
Reed, Mike
Bremner, Stephen
Perry, Nicky
Scarborough, Matthew
author_sort Kümin, Michelle
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 70,000 to 75,000 proximal femoral fracture repairs take place in the UK each year. Hemiarthroplasty is the preferred treatment for adults aged over 60 years. Postoperative infection affects up to 3% of patients and is the single most common reason for early return to theatre. Ultraclean ventilation was introduced to help mitigate the risk of infection, but it may also contribute to inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, which itself is a risk for postoperative infection. To counter this, active intraoperative warming is used for all procedures that take 30 min or more. Forced air warming (FAW) and resistive fabric warming (RFW) are the two principal techniques used for this purpose; they are equally effective in prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, but it is not known which is associated with the lowest infection rates. Deep surgical site infection doubles operative costs, triples investigation costs and quadruples ward costs. The Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO) study seeks to compare infection rates with FAW versus RFW after hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. A cost-neutral intervention capable of reducing postoperative infection rates would likely lead to a change in practice, yield significant savings for the health economy, reduce overall exposure to antibiotics and improve outcomes following hip fracture in the elderly. The findings may be transferable to other orthopaedic implant procedures and to non-orthopaedic surgical specialties. METHODS: RIIiO is a parallel group, open label study randomising hip fracture patients over 60 years of age who are undergoing hemiarthroplasty to RFW or FAW. Participants are followed up for 3 months. Definitive deep surgical site infection within 90 days of surgery, the primary endpoint, is determined by a blinded endpoint committee. DISCUSSION: Hemiarthroplasty carries a risk of deep surgical site infection of approximately 3%. In order to provide 90% power to demonstrate an absolute risk reduction of 1%, using a 5% significance level, a full trial would need to recruit approximately 8630 participants. A pilot study is being conducted in the first instance to demonstrate that recruitment and data management strategies are appropriate and robust before embarking on a large multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN74612906. Registered on 27 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3011-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6245696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62456962018-11-26 Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults Kümin, Michelle Harper, Christopher Mark Reed, Mike Bremner, Stephen Perry, Nicky Scarborough, Matthew Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Approximately 70,000 to 75,000 proximal femoral fracture repairs take place in the UK each year. Hemiarthroplasty is the preferred treatment for adults aged over 60 years. Postoperative infection affects up to 3% of patients and is the single most common reason for early return to theatre. Ultraclean ventilation was introduced to help mitigate the risk of infection, but it may also contribute to inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, which itself is a risk for postoperative infection. To counter this, active intraoperative warming is used for all procedures that take 30 min or more. Forced air warming (FAW) and resistive fabric warming (RFW) are the two principal techniques used for this purpose; they are equally effective in prevention of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, but it is not known which is associated with the lowest infection rates. Deep surgical site infection doubles operative costs, triples investigation costs and quadruples ward costs. The Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO) study seeks to compare infection rates with FAW versus RFW after hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture. A cost-neutral intervention capable of reducing postoperative infection rates would likely lead to a change in practice, yield significant savings for the health economy, reduce overall exposure to antibiotics and improve outcomes following hip fracture in the elderly. The findings may be transferable to other orthopaedic implant procedures and to non-orthopaedic surgical specialties. METHODS: RIIiO is a parallel group, open label study randomising hip fracture patients over 60 years of age who are undergoing hemiarthroplasty to RFW or FAW. Participants are followed up for 3 months. Definitive deep surgical site infection within 90 days of surgery, the primary endpoint, is determined by a blinded endpoint committee. DISCUSSION: Hemiarthroplasty carries a risk of deep surgical site infection of approximately 3%. In order to provide 90% power to demonstrate an absolute risk reduction of 1%, using a 5% significance level, a full trial would need to recruit approximately 8630 participants. A pilot study is being conducted in the first instance to demonstrate that recruitment and data management strategies are appropriate and robust before embarking on a large multi-centre trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN, ISRCTN74612906. Registered on 27 February 2017. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-3011-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6245696/ /pubmed/30454034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3011-y Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kümin, Michelle
Harper, Christopher Mark
Reed, Mike
Bremner, Stephen
Perry, Nicky
Scarborough, Matthew
Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title_full Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title_fullStr Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title_short Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
title_sort reducing implant infection in orthopaedics (riiio): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3011-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kuminmichelle reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults
AT harperchristophermark reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults
AT reedmike reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults
AT bremnerstephen reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults
AT perrynicky reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults
AT scarboroughmatthew reducingimplantinfectioninorthopaedicsriiioapilotstudyforarandomisedcontrolledtrialcomparingtheinfluenceofforcedairversusresistivefabricwarmingtechnologiesonpostoperativeinfectionratesfollowingorthopaedicimplantsurgeryinadults