Cargando…

Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial

BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion and examine any association between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality in sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective, formally designed substudy of participants in the Protocolized...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Massey, Michael J., Hou, Peter C., Filbin, Michael, Wang, Henry, Ngo, Long, Huang, David T., Aird, William C., Novack, Victor, Trzeciak, Stephen, Yealy, Donald M., Kellum, John A., Angus, Derek C., Shapiro, Nathan I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5
_version_ 1783372294096158720
author Massey, Michael J.
Hou, Peter C.
Filbin, Michael
Wang, Henry
Ngo, Long
Huang, David T.
Aird, William C.
Novack, Victor
Trzeciak, Stephen
Yealy, Donald M.
Kellum, John A.
Angus, Derek C.
Shapiro, Nathan I.
author_facet Massey, Michael J.
Hou, Peter C.
Filbin, Michael
Wang, Henry
Ngo, Long
Huang, David T.
Aird, William C.
Novack, Victor
Trzeciak, Stephen
Yealy, Donald M.
Kellum, John A.
Angus, Derek C.
Shapiro, Nathan I.
author_sort Massey, Michael J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion and examine any association between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality in sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective, formally designed substudy of participants in the Protocolized Care in Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) trial. We recruited from six sites with the equipment and training to perform these study procedures. All subjects were adults with septic shock, and each was assigned to alternative resuscitation strategies. The two main analyses assessed (1) the impact of resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion parameters and (2) the association of microcirculatory perfusion with 60-day in-hospital mortality. We measured sublingual microcirculatory perfusion using sidestream dark field in vivo video microscopy at the completion of the 6-h ProCESS resuscitation protocol and then again at 24 and 72 h. RESULTS: We enrolled 207 subjects (demographics were similar to the overall ProCESS cohort) and observed 40 (19.3%) deaths. There were no differences in average perfusion characteristics between treatment arms. Analyzing the relationship between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality, we found an association between vascular density parameters and mortality. Total vascular density (beta = 0.006, p < 0.003), perfused vascular density (beta = 0.005, p < 0.04), and De Backer score (beta = 0.009, p < 0.01) were higher overall in survivors in a generalized estimating equation model, and this association was significant at the 72-h time point (p < 0.05 for each parameter). CONCLUSIONS: Microcirculatory perfusion did not differ between three early septic shock treatment arms. We found an association between microcirculatory perfusion parameters of vascular density at 72 h and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00510835. Registered on August 2, 2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6245723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62457232018-11-26 Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial Massey, Michael J. Hou, Peter C. Filbin, Michael Wang, Henry Ngo, Long Huang, David T. Aird, William C. Novack, Victor Trzeciak, Stephen Yealy, Donald M. Kellum, John A. Angus, Derek C. Shapiro, Nathan I. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: We sought to determine the effects of alternative resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion and examine any association between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality in sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective, formally designed substudy of participants in the Protocolized Care in Early Septic Shock (ProCESS) trial. We recruited from six sites with the equipment and training to perform these study procedures. All subjects were adults with septic shock, and each was assigned to alternative resuscitation strategies. The two main analyses assessed (1) the impact of resuscitation strategies on microcirculatory perfusion parameters and (2) the association of microcirculatory perfusion with 60-day in-hospital mortality. We measured sublingual microcirculatory perfusion using sidestream dark field in vivo video microscopy at the completion of the 6-h ProCESS resuscitation protocol and then again at 24 and 72 h. RESULTS: We enrolled 207 subjects (demographics were similar to the overall ProCESS cohort) and observed 40 (19.3%) deaths. There were no differences in average perfusion characteristics between treatment arms. Analyzing the relationship between microcirculatory perfusion and mortality, we found an association between vascular density parameters and mortality. Total vascular density (beta = 0.006, p < 0.003), perfused vascular density (beta = 0.005, p < 0.04), and De Backer score (beta = 0.009, p < 0.01) were higher overall in survivors in a generalized estimating equation model, and this association was significant at the 72-h time point (p < 0.05 for each parameter). CONCLUSIONS: Microcirculatory perfusion did not differ between three early septic shock treatment arms. We found an association between microcirculatory perfusion parameters of vascular density at 72 h and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00510835. Registered on August 2, 2007. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6245723/ /pubmed/30458880 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Massey, Michael J.
Hou, Peter C.
Filbin, Michael
Wang, Henry
Ngo, Long
Huang, David T.
Aird, William C.
Novack, Victor
Trzeciak, Stephen
Yealy, Donald M.
Kellum, John A.
Angus, Derek C.
Shapiro, Nathan I.
Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title_full Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title_fullStr Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title_full_unstemmed Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title_short Microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the ProCESS trial
title_sort microcirculatory perfusion disturbances in septic shock: results from the process trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458880
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2240-5
work_keys_str_mv AT masseymichaelj microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT houpeterc microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT filbinmichael microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT wanghenry microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT ngolong microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT huangdavidt microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT airdwilliamc microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT novackvictor microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT trzeciakstephen microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT yealydonaldm microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT kellumjohna microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT angusderekc microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT shapironathani microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial
AT microcirculatoryperfusiondisturbancesinsepticshockresultsfromtheprocesstrial