Cargando…

Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal carcinoma (OC) is one of the leading cancers in Sri Lanka. Its increasing incidence despite the implementation of various preventive activities addressing the conventional risk factors indicates the possibility of the existence of novel, country-specific risk factors. Thus, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari, Nawarathne, Metthananda, Arambepola, Carukshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4975-4
_version_ 1783372340712701952
author Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari
Nawarathne, Metthananda
Arambepola, Carukshi
author_facet Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari
Nawarathne, Metthananda
Arambepola, Carukshi
author_sort Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oesophageal carcinoma (OC) is one of the leading cancers in Sri Lanka. Its increasing incidence despite the implementation of various preventive activities addressing the conventional risk factors indicates the possibility of the existence of novel, country-specific risk factors. Thus, the identification of novel risk factors of OC specific to Sri Lanka is crucial for implementation of primary prevention activities. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted among 49 incident cases of OC recruited from the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama using a non-probability sampling method, and unmatched hospital controls (n = 196) excluded of having OC recruited from the endoscopy unit of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Data were collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Risk factors for OC were assessed by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk factors were adjusted for possible confounding by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the study population, OC was common among males (69%) and the majority presented with squamous cell carcinoma (65%) at late stages (Stage IV: 45%; Stage III: 37%). Following adjusting for confounders, the risk factor profile for OC included; age > 65 years (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2–14.2); family history of cancer (OR = 5.04; 95% CI: 1.3–19.0); sub-optimal consumption of dietary fibre (OR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.1–12.3); sub-optimal consumption of anti-oxidants (OR = 7.0; 95% CI: 2.2–22.5); over-consumption of deep fried food (OR = 6.68; 95% CI:2.0–22.6); ‘high risk’ alcohol drinking (OR = 11.7; 95% CI: 2.8–49.4); betel quid chewing (OR = 6.1; 95% CI: 2.0, 20.0); ‘low’ lifetime total sports and exercise activities (MET hours/week/year) (OR = 5.83; 95% CI: 1.5–23.0); agrochemicals exposure (OR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.4–30.3); pipe-borne drinking water (OR = 5.62; 95% CI:1.7–18.9) and radiation exposure (OR = 4.64; 95% CI: 1.4–15.5). Significant effect modifications were seen between betel quid chewing and male sex (p = 0.01) and between ever exposure to radiation and age over 65 years (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Risk profile for OC includes novel yet modifiable risk factors in relation to diet, occupation, environment and health. Primary prevention should target these to combat OC in Sri Lanka. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4975-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6245903
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62459032018-11-26 Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari Nawarathne, Metthananda Arambepola, Carukshi BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Oesophageal carcinoma (OC) is one of the leading cancers in Sri Lanka. Its increasing incidence despite the implementation of various preventive activities addressing the conventional risk factors indicates the possibility of the existence of novel, country-specific risk factors. Thus, the identification of novel risk factors of OC specific to Sri Lanka is crucial for implementation of primary prevention activities. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted among 49 incident cases of OC recruited from the National Cancer Institute, Maharagama using a non-probability sampling method, and unmatched hospital controls (n = 196) excluded of having OC recruited from the endoscopy unit of the National Hospital of Sri Lanka. Data were collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Risk factors for OC were assessed by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The risk factors were adjusted for possible confounding by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the study population, OC was common among males (69%) and the majority presented with squamous cell carcinoma (65%) at late stages (Stage IV: 45%; Stage III: 37%). Following adjusting for confounders, the risk factor profile for OC included; age > 65 years (OR = 4.0; 95% CI: 1.2–14.2); family history of cancer (OR = 5.04; 95% CI: 1.3–19.0); sub-optimal consumption of dietary fibre (OR = 3.58; 95% CI: 1.1–12.3); sub-optimal consumption of anti-oxidants (OR = 7.0; 95% CI: 2.2–22.5); over-consumption of deep fried food (OR = 6.68; 95% CI:2.0–22.6); ‘high risk’ alcohol drinking (OR = 11.7; 95% CI: 2.8–49.4); betel quid chewing (OR = 6.1; 95% CI: 2.0, 20.0); ‘low’ lifetime total sports and exercise activities (MET hours/week/year) (OR = 5.83; 95% CI: 1.5–23.0); agrochemicals exposure (OR = 6.57; 95% CI: 1.4–30.3); pipe-borne drinking water (OR = 5.62; 95% CI:1.7–18.9) and radiation exposure (OR = 4.64; 95% CI: 1.4–15.5). Significant effect modifications were seen between betel quid chewing and male sex (p = 0.01) and between ever exposure to radiation and age over 65 years (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Risk profile for OC includes novel yet modifiable risk factors in relation to diet, occupation, environment and health. Primary prevention should target these to combat OC in Sri Lanka. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-4975-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6245903/ /pubmed/30454012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4975-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Talagala, Ishanka Ayeshwari
Nawarathne, Metthananda
Arambepola, Carukshi
Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title_full Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title_fullStr Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title_full_unstemmed Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title_short Novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from Sri Lanka
title_sort novel risk factors for primary prevention of oesophageal carcinoma: a case-control study from sri lanka
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245903/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-018-4975-4
work_keys_str_mv AT talagalaishankaayeshwari novelriskfactorsforprimarypreventionofoesophagealcarcinomaacasecontrolstudyfromsrilanka
AT nawarathnemetthananda novelriskfactorsforprimarypreventionofoesophagealcarcinomaacasecontrolstudyfromsrilanka
AT arambepolacarukshi novelriskfactorsforprimarypreventionofoesophagealcarcinomaacasecontrolstudyfromsrilanka