Cargando…

The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses

BACKGROUND: This was a panel study of the prevalence of C. burnetii infection in does in an endemic dairy goat enterprise in Victoria, Australia. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence of does shedding C. burnetii at the time of parturition and to quantify the concentration of genome eq...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Canevari, José T., Firestone, Simon M., Vincent, Gemma, Campbell, Angus, Tan, Tabita, Muleme, Michael, Cameron, Alexander W. N., Stevenson, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1667-x
_version_ 1783372342108356608
author Canevari, José T.
Firestone, Simon M.
Vincent, Gemma
Campbell, Angus
Tan, Tabita
Muleme, Michael
Cameron, Alexander W. N.
Stevenson, Mark A.
author_facet Canevari, José T.
Firestone, Simon M.
Vincent, Gemma
Campbell, Angus
Tan, Tabita
Muleme, Michael
Cameron, Alexander W. N.
Stevenson, Mark A.
author_sort Canevari, José T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This was a panel study of the prevalence of C. burnetii infection in does in an endemic dairy goat enterprise in Victoria, Australia. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence of does shedding C. burnetii at the time of parturition and to quantify the concentration of genome equivalents (GE) present in each C. burnetii positive sample. Our second objective was to determine the proportion of positive does that were persistent shedders. Our final objective was to quantify the association between C. burnetii qPCR status at the time of kidding and daily milk volumes produced during the subsequent lactation. RESULTS: Vaginal swabs (n= 490) were collected from does at the time of kidding and analysed using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. Shedding of C. burnetii was detected in 15% (95% CI: 12% to 18%) of the sampled does. Does were classified as qPCR-negative, qPCR-positive low and qPCR-positive high based on the estimated concentration of GE from the qPCR. Persistent shedding at relatively low concentrations was detected in 20% (95% CI: 10% to35%) of shedding does sampled again at their subsequent parturition. After controlling for possible confounders and adjusting for variation in daily milk yields at the individual doe level, daily milk yields for qPCR-positive high does were reduced by 17% (95% CI: 3% to 32%) compared to qPCR-negative does (p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Shedding concentrations of C. burnetii were highly skewed, with a relatively small group of does shedding relatively high quantities of C. burnetii. Further, high shedding does had reduced milk yields compared to qPCR-negative does. Early detection and culling of high shedding does would result in increased farm profitability and reduce the risk of Q fever transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6245909
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62459092018-11-26 The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses Canevari, José T. Firestone, Simon M. Vincent, Gemma Campbell, Angus Tan, Tabita Muleme, Michael Cameron, Alexander W. N. Stevenson, Mark A. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: This was a panel study of the prevalence of C. burnetii infection in does in an endemic dairy goat enterprise in Victoria, Australia. Our first objective was to determine the prevalence of does shedding C. burnetii at the time of parturition and to quantify the concentration of genome equivalents (GE) present in each C. burnetii positive sample. Our second objective was to determine the proportion of positive does that were persistent shedders. Our final objective was to quantify the association between C. burnetii qPCR status at the time of kidding and daily milk volumes produced during the subsequent lactation. RESULTS: Vaginal swabs (n= 490) were collected from does at the time of kidding and analysed using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay. Shedding of C. burnetii was detected in 15% (95% CI: 12% to 18%) of the sampled does. Does were classified as qPCR-negative, qPCR-positive low and qPCR-positive high based on the estimated concentration of GE from the qPCR. Persistent shedding at relatively low concentrations was detected in 20% (95% CI: 10% to35%) of shedding does sampled again at their subsequent parturition. After controlling for possible confounders and adjusting for variation in daily milk yields at the individual doe level, daily milk yields for qPCR-positive high does were reduced by 17% (95% CI: 3% to 32%) compared to qPCR-negative does (p= 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Shedding concentrations of C. burnetii were highly skewed, with a relatively small group of does shedding relatively high quantities of C. burnetii. Further, high shedding does had reduced milk yields compared to qPCR-negative does. Early detection and culling of high shedding does would result in increased farm profitability and reduce the risk of Q fever transmission. BioMed Central 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6245909/ /pubmed/30453951 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1667-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Canevari, José T.
Firestone, Simon M.
Vincent, Gemma
Campbell, Angus
Tan, Tabita
Muleme, Michael
Cameron, Alexander W. N.
Stevenson, Mark A.
The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title_full The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title_fullStr The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title_short The prevalence of Coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
title_sort prevalence of coxiella burnetii shedding in dairy goats at the time of parturition in an endemically infected enterprise and associated milk yield losses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6245909/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30453951
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1667-x
work_keys_str_mv AT canevarijoset theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT firestonesimonm theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT vincentgemma theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT campbellangus theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT tantabita theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT mulememichael theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT cameronalexanderwn theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT stevensonmarka theprevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT canevarijoset prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT firestonesimonm prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT vincentgemma prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT campbellangus prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT tantabita prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT mulememichael prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT cameronalexanderwn prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses
AT stevensonmarka prevalenceofcoxiellaburnetiisheddingindairygoatsatthetimeofparturitioninanendemicallyinfectedenterpriseandassociatedmilkyieldlosses