Cargando…

Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae

Abstract. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the six currently accepted species in the genus Echinocactus have partially clarified certain aspects of its phylogeny. Most of the studies lack a complete sampling of Echinocactus and are based only in one source of data. Phylogenetic uncertainties in Ech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel, Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia, Majure, Lucas Charles, uente-Martínez, Raúl, cías, Héctor Manuel Hernández M, una, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pensoft Publishers 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
_version_ 1783372381281058816
author Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel
Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia
Majure, Lucas Charles
uente-Martínez, Raúl
cías, Héctor Manuel Hernández M
una, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas
author_facet Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel
Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia
Majure, Lucas Charles
uente-Martínez, Raúl
cías, Héctor Manuel Hernández M
una, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas
author_sort Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel
collection PubMed
description Abstract. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the six currently accepted species in the genus Echinocactus have partially clarified certain aspects of its phylogeny. Most of the studies lack a complete sampling of Echinocactus and are based only in one source of data. Phylogenetic uncertainties in Echinocactus, such as the recognition of Homalocephala as a different genus from Echinocactus, the exclusion of E.grusonii or the affinities of E.polycephalus, are here resolved. Phylogenetic relationships of Echinocactus were reconstructed with a maximum parsimony, a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian approach including 42 morphological characters, four chloroplast markers (atpB-rbcL, trnH-psbA, trnL-trnF and trnK/matK) and two nuclear genes. The utility of these two nuclear regions related to the betalain cycles (DODA and 5GT) are explored and discussed in relation to their potential as phylogenetic markers. Concatenated analyses with morphological and molecular data sets, plus 13 indels (2847 characters and 26 taxa), show general agreement with previous independent phylogenetic proposals but with strong support in order to propose the recognition of a reduced Echinocactus and the recognition of Homalocephala at the generic level. These results recovered a polyphyletic Echinocactus as currently defined. The here-named HEA clade, recovers the species of Homalocephala, Echinocacuts and Astrophytum as a monophyletic group with strong internal support. The Homalocephala (H.texensis, H.parryi and H.polycephala), was recovered as sister to the Echinocactus clade (E.platyacanthus and E.horizonthalonius), plus the Astrophytum clade. Consequently, we propose here to recognise a monophyletic Echinocactus and a monophyletic Homalocephala as two distinct genera with their own molecular and morphological synapomorphies. The evolution of some morphological characters supporting these clades are discussed, the necessary new taxonomic combinations for Homalocephala are proposed and an identification key for the genera, the species and the subspecies of the HEA clade are presented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6246732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Pensoft Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62467322018-11-27 Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia Majure, Lucas Charles uente-Martínez, Raúl cías, Héctor Manuel Hernández M una, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas PhytoKeys Research Article Abstract. Molecular phylogenetic studies of the six currently accepted species in the genus Echinocactus have partially clarified certain aspects of its phylogeny. Most of the studies lack a complete sampling of Echinocactus and are based only in one source of data. Phylogenetic uncertainties in Echinocactus, such as the recognition of Homalocephala as a different genus from Echinocactus, the exclusion of E.grusonii or the affinities of E.polycephalus, are here resolved. Phylogenetic relationships of Echinocactus were reconstructed with a maximum parsimony, a maximum likelihood and a Bayesian approach including 42 morphological characters, four chloroplast markers (atpB-rbcL, trnH-psbA, trnL-trnF and trnK/matK) and two nuclear genes. The utility of these two nuclear regions related to the betalain cycles (DODA and 5GT) are explored and discussed in relation to their potential as phylogenetic markers. Concatenated analyses with morphological and molecular data sets, plus 13 indels (2847 characters and 26 taxa), show general agreement with previous independent phylogenetic proposals but with strong support in order to propose the recognition of a reduced Echinocactus and the recognition of Homalocephala at the generic level. These results recovered a polyphyletic Echinocactus as currently defined. The here-named HEA clade, recovers the species of Homalocephala, Echinocacuts and Astrophytum as a monophyletic group with strong internal support. The Homalocephala (H.texensis, H.parryi and H.polycephala), was recovered as sister to the Echinocactus clade (E.platyacanthus and E.horizonthalonius), plus the Astrophytum clade. Consequently, we propose here to recognise a monophyletic Echinocactus and a monophyletic Homalocephala as two distinct genera with their own molecular and morphological synapomorphies. The evolution of some morphological characters supporting these clades are discussed, the necessary new taxonomic combinations for Homalocephala are proposed and an identification key for the genera, the species and the subspecies of the HEA clade are presented. Pensoft Publishers 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6246732/ /pubmed/30483031 http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856 Text en Mario Daniel Vargas-Luna, Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, Lucas Charles Majure, Raúl uente-Martínez, Héctor Manuel Hernández M cías, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas una http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Vargas-Luna, Mario Daniel
Hernández-Ledesma, Patricia
Majure, Lucas Charles
uente-Martínez, Raúl
cías, Héctor Manuel Hernández M
una, Rolando Tenoch Bárcenas
Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title_full Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title_fullStr Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title_full_unstemmed Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title_short Splitting Echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of Homalocephala as a distinct genus in the Cacteae
title_sort splitting echinocactus: morphological and molecular evidence support the recognition of homalocephala as a distinct genus in the cacteae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30483031
http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.111.26856
work_keys_str_mv AT vargaslunamariodaniel splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae
AT hernandezledesmapatricia splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae
AT majurelucascharles splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae
AT uentemartinezraul splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae
AT ciashectormanuelhernandezm splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae
AT unarolandotenochbarcenas splittingechinocactusmorphologicalandmolecularevidencesupporttherecognitionofhomalocephalaasadistinctgenusinthecacteae