Cargando…

Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities

BACKGROUND: Forest landscape restoration (FLR) has been adopted by governments and practitioners across the globe to mitigate and adapt to climate change and restore ecological functions across degraded landscapes. However, the extent to which these activities capture CO(2) with associated climate m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernal, Blanca, Murray, Lara T., Pearson, Timothy R. H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8
_version_ 1783372386549104640
author Bernal, Blanca
Murray, Lara T.
Pearson, Timothy R. H.
author_facet Bernal, Blanca
Murray, Lara T.
Pearson, Timothy R. H.
author_sort Bernal, Blanca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Forest landscape restoration (FLR) has been adopted by governments and practitioners across the globe to mitigate and adapt to climate change and restore ecological functions across degraded landscapes. However, the extent to which these activities capture CO(2) with associated climate mitigation impacts are poorly known, especially in geographies where data on biomass growth of restored forests are limited or do not exist. To fill this gap, we developed biomass accumulation rates for a set of FLR activities (natural regeneration, planted forests and woodlots, agroforestry, and mangrove restoration) across the globe and global CO(2) removal rates with corresponding confidence intervals, grouped by FLR activity and region/climate. RESULTS: Planted forests and woodlots were found to have the highest CO(2) removal rates, ranging from 4.5 to 40.7 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) during the first 20 years of growth. Mangrove tree restoration was the second most efficient FLR at removing CO(2), with growth rates up to 23.1 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) the first 20 years post restoration. Natural regeneration removal rates were 9.1–18.8 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) during the first 20 years of forest regeneration, followed by agroforestry, the FLR category with the lowest and regionally broad removal rates (10.8–15.6 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1)). Biomass growth data was most abundant and widely distributed across the world for planted forests and natural regeneration, representing 45% and 32% of all the data points assessed, respectively. Agroforestry studies, were only found in Africa, Asia, and the Latin America and Caribbean regions. CONCLUSION: This study represents the most comprehensive review of published literature on tree growth and CO(2) removals to date, which we operationalized by constructing removal rates for specific FLR activities across the globe. These rates can easily be applied by practitioners and decision-makers seeking to better understand the positive climate mitigation impacts of existing or planned FLR actions, or by countries making restoration pledges under the Bonn Challenge Commitments or fulfilling Nationally Determined Contributions to the UNFCCC, thereby helping boost FLR efforts world-wide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6246754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62467542018-12-18 Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities Bernal, Blanca Murray, Lara T. Pearson, Timothy R. H. Carbon Balance Manag Review BACKGROUND: Forest landscape restoration (FLR) has been adopted by governments and practitioners across the globe to mitigate and adapt to climate change and restore ecological functions across degraded landscapes. However, the extent to which these activities capture CO(2) with associated climate mitigation impacts are poorly known, especially in geographies where data on biomass growth of restored forests are limited or do not exist. To fill this gap, we developed biomass accumulation rates for a set of FLR activities (natural regeneration, planted forests and woodlots, agroforestry, and mangrove restoration) across the globe and global CO(2) removal rates with corresponding confidence intervals, grouped by FLR activity and region/climate. RESULTS: Planted forests and woodlots were found to have the highest CO(2) removal rates, ranging from 4.5 to 40.7 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) during the first 20 years of growth. Mangrove tree restoration was the second most efficient FLR at removing CO(2), with growth rates up to 23.1 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) the first 20 years post restoration. Natural regeneration removal rates were 9.1–18.8 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1) during the first 20 years of forest regeneration, followed by agroforestry, the FLR category with the lowest and regionally broad removal rates (10.8–15.6 t CO(2) ha(−1) year(−1)). Biomass growth data was most abundant and widely distributed across the world for planted forests and natural regeneration, representing 45% and 32% of all the data points assessed, respectively. Agroforestry studies, were only found in Africa, Asia, and the Latin America and Caribbean regions. CONCLUSION: This study represents the most comprehensive review of published literature on tree growth and CO(2) removals to date, which we operationalized by constructing removal rates for specific FLR activities across the globe. These rates can easily be applied by practitioners and decision-makers seeking to better understand the positive climate mitigation impacts of existing or planned FLR actions, or by countries making restoration pledges under the Bonn Challenge Commitments or fulfilling Nationally Determined Contributions to the UNFCCC, thereby helping boost FLR efforts world-wide. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6246754/ /pubmed/30460418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Bernal, Blanca
Murray, Lara T.
Pearson, Timothy R. H.
Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title_full Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title_fullStr Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title_full_unstemmed Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title_short Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
title_sort global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13021-018-0110-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bernalblanca globalcarbondioxideremovalratesfromforestlandscaperestorationactivities
AT murraylarat globalcarbondioxideremovalratesfromforestlandscaperestorationactivities
AT pearsontimothyrh globalcarbondioxideremovalratesfromforestlandscaperestorationactivities