Cargando…
Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic conditions in the world today. It results in breakdown of cartilage in joints and causes the patient to experience intense pain and even disability. The pathophysiology of OA is not fully understood; therefore, there is currently no cure for OA....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40169-018-0215-4 |
_version_ | 1783372387472900096 |
---|---|
author | Bapat, Santul Hubbard, Daniel Munjal, Akul Hunter, Monte Fulzele, Sadanand |
author_facet | Bapat, Santul Hubbard, Daniel Munjal, Akul Hunter, Monte Fulzele, Sadanand |
author_sort | Bapat, Santul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic conditions in the world today. It results in breakdown of cartilage in joints and causes the patient to experience intense pain and even disability. The pathophysiology of OA is not fully understood; therefore, there is currently no cure for OA. Many researchers are investigating the pathophysiology of the disease and attempting to develop methods to alleviate the symptoms or cure the OA entirely using animal models. Most studies on OA use animal models; this is necessary as the disease develops very slowly in humans and presents differently in each patient. This makes it difficult to effectively study the progression of osteoarthritis. Animal models can be spontaneous, in which OA naturally occurs in the animal. Genetic modifications can be used to make the mice more susceptible to developing OA. Osteoarthritis can also be induced via surgery, chemical injections, or non-invasive trauma. This review aims to describe animal models of inducing osteoarthritis with a focus on the models used on mice and their advantages and disadvantages that each model presents. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6246759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62467592018-12-06 Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis Bapat, Santul Hubbard, Daniel Munjal, Akul Hunter, Monte Fulzele, Sadanand Clin Transl Med Review Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common chronic conditions in the world today. It results in breakdown of cartilage in joints and causes the patient to experience intense pain and even disability. The pathophysiology of OA is not fully understood; therefore, there is currently no cure for OA. Many researchers are investigating the pathophysiology of the disease and attempting to develop methods to alleviate the symptoms or cure the OA entirely using animal models. Most studies on OA use animal models; this is necessary as the disease develops very slowly in humans and presents differently in each patient. This makes it difficult to effectively study the progression of osteoarthritis. Animal models can be spontaneous, in which OA naturally occurs in the animal. Genetic modifications can be used to make the mice more susceptible to developing OA. Osteoarthritis can also be induced via surgery, chemical injections, or non-invasive trauma. This review aims to describe animal models of inducing osteoarthritis with a focus on the models used on mice and their advantages and disadvantages that each model presents. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6246759/ /pubmed/30460596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40169-018-0215-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Bapat, Santul Hubbard, Daniel Munjal, Akul Hunter, Monte Fulzele, Sadanand Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title | Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title_full | Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title_fullStr | Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title_short | Pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
title_sort | pros and cons of mouse models for studying osteoarthritis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30460596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40169-018-0215-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bapatsantul prosandconsofmousemodelsforstudyingosteoarthritis AT hubbarddaniel prosandconsofmousemodelsforstudyingosteoarthritis AT munjalakul prosandconsofmousemodelsforstudyingosteoarthritis AT huntermonte prosandconsofmousemodelsforstudyingosteoarthritis AT fulzelesadanand prosandconsofmousemodelsforstudyingosteoarthritis |