Cargando…

Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if shoulder and pelvic angular velocities differ at impact or peak magnitude between professional and amateur golfers. Golf swing rotational biomechanics are a key determinant of power generation, driving distance, and injury prevention. We hypothesize that shoulder and pelvic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steele, Katherine M., Roh, Eugene Y., Mahtani, Gordhan, Meister, David W., Ladd, Amy L., Rose, Jessica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404420
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.713
_version_ 1783372395173642240
author Steele, Katherine M.
Roh, Eugene Y.
Mahtani, Gordhan
Meister, David W.
Ladd, Amy L.
Rose, Jessica
author_facet Steele, Katherine M.
Roh, Eugene Y.
Mahtani, Gordhan
Meister, David W.
Ladd, Amy L.
Rose, Jessica
author_sort Steele, Katherine M.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if shoulder and pelvic angular velocities differ at impact or peak magnitude between professional and amateur golfers. Golf swing rotational biomechanics are a key determinant of power generation, driving distance, and injury prevention. We hypothesize that shoulder and pelvic angular velocities would be highly consistent in professionals. METHODS: Rotational velocities of the upper-torso and pelvis throughout the golf swing and in relation to phases of the golf swing were examined in 11 professionals and compared to 5 amateurs using three-dimensional motion analysis. RESULTS: Peak rotational velocities of professionals were highly consistent, demonstrating low variability (coefficient of variation [COV]), particularly upper-torso rotational velocity (COV=0.086) and pelvic rotational velocity (COV=0.079) during down swing. Peak upper-torso rotational velocity and peak X-prime, the relative rotational velocity of uppertorso versus pelvis, occurred after impact in follow-through, were reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.005 and p=0.005, respectively) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. In contrast, peak pelvic rotational velocity occurred in down swing. Pelvic velocity at impact was reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.019) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. CONCLUSION: Golf swing rotational velocity of professionals was consistent in pattern and magnitude, offering benchmarks for amateurs. Understanding golf swing rotational biomechanics can guide swing modifications to help optimize performance and prevent injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6246863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62468632018-11-26 Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through Steele, Katherine M. Roh, Eugene Y. Mahtani, Gordhan Meister, David W. Ladd, Amy L. Rose, Jessica Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if shoulder and pelvic angular velocities differ at impact or peak magnitude between professional and amateur golfers. Golf swing rotational biomechanics are a key determinant of power generation, driving distance, and injury prevention. We hypothesize that shoulder and pelvic angular velocities would be highly consistent in professionals. METHODS: Rotational velocities of the upper-torso and pelvis throughout the golf swing and in relation to phases of the golf swing were examined in 11 professionals and compared to 5 amateurs using three-dimensional motion analysis. RESULTS: Peak rotational velocities of professionals were highly consistent, demonstrating low variability (coefficient of variation [COV]), particularly upper-torso rotational velocity (COV=0.086) and pelvic rotational velocity (COV=0.079) during down swing. Peak upper-torso rotational velocity and peak X-prime, the relative rotational velocity of uppertorso versus pelvis, occurred after impact in follow-through, were reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.005 and p=0.005, respectively) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. In contrast, peak pelvic rotational velocity occurred in down swing. Pelvic velocity at impact was reduced in amateurs compared to professionals (p=0.019) and differentiated professionals from most (4/5) amateurs. CONCLUSION: Golf swing rotational velocity of professionals was consistent in pattern and magnitude, offering benchmarks for amateurs. Understanding golf swing rotational biomechanics can guide swing modifications to help optimize performance and prevent injury. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2018-10 2018-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6246863/ /pubmed/30404420 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.713 Text en Copyright © 2018 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Steele, Katherine M.
Roh, Eugene Y.
Mahtani, Gordhan
Meister, David W.
Ladd, Amy L.
Rose, Jessica
Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title_full Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title_fullStr Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title_full_unstemmed Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title_short Golf Swing Rotational Velocity: The Essential Follow-Through
title_sort golf swing rotational velocity: the essential follow-through
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404420
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2018.42.5.713
work_keys_str_mv AT steelekatherinem golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough
AT roheugeney golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough
AT mahtanigordhan golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough
AT meisterdavidw golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough
AT laddamyl golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough
AT rosejessica golfswingrotationalvelocitytheessentialfollowthrough