Cargando…

Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?

BACKGROUND: HER2+ and hormone receptor (HoR)‐negative breast cancer usually associated with poor outcome. However, it remained elusive for the prognosis of small (T1a‐T1c) HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer. The present study retrospectively analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Changjun, Zhou, Yidong, Zhu, Hanjiang, Huang, Wei, Chen, Ziyuan, Mao, Feng, Lin, Yan, Zhang, Xiaohui, Shen, Songjie, Zhong, Ying, Li, Yan, Sun, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1785
_version_ 1783372405659402240
author Wang, Changjun
Zhou, Yidong
Zhu, Hanjiang
Huang, Wei
Chen, Ziyuan
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Zhang, Xiaohui
Shen, Songjie
Zhong, Ying
Li, Yan
Sun, Qiang
author_facet Wang, Changjun
Zhou, Yidong
Zhu, Hanjiang
Huang, Wei
Chen, Ziyuan
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Zhang, Xiaohui
Shen, Songjie
Zhong, Ying
Li, Yan
Sun, Qiang
author_sort Wang, Changjun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HER2+ and hormone receptor (HoR)‐negative breast cancer usually associated with poor outcome. However, it remained elusive for the prognosis of small (T1a‐T1c) HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer. The present study retrospectively analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of T1a‐T1c HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data for patients diagnosed with either HER2‐/HoR+or HER2+/HoR‐ T1a‐T1c breast cancer between 2010 and 2012 were obtained from SEER program. Survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportion hazard regression. RESULTS: Totally, 2648 HER2+/HoR‐ and 56387 HER2‐/HoR+T1a‐T1c breast cancer patients were enrolled. There was a clear trend that tumor size had a positive correlation with advanced AJCC stage (P < 0.001) and N‐stage (P < 0.001). T1a and T1b HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer had great homogeneity in that these two subgroups had comparable survival and both showed no significant survival difference with its counterpart of HER2‐/HoR+subtype. Conversely, T1c HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancers revealed worse prognosis than T1a/T1b HER2+/HoR‐ and T1c HER2‐/HoR+tumors (BCSS HR 3.847, P < 0.001; OS HR 2.055, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: T1a and T1b HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer had favorable prognosis and great homogeneity, indicating 1.0 cm may be a suitable cutoff for subclassification of T1 cancer. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted to verify this hypothesis and elucidate the biological behavior of small T1 tumor to facilitate precise medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6246936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62469362018-11-26 Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer? Wang, Changjun Zhou, Yidong Zhu, Hanjiang Huang, Wei Chen, Ziyuan Mao, Feng Lin, Yan Zhang, Xiaohui Shen, Songjie Zhong, Ying Li, Yan Sun, Qiang Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research BACKGROUND: HER2+ and hormone receptor (HoR)‐negative breast cancer usually associated with poor outcome. However, it remained elusive for the prognosis of small (T1a‐T1c) HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer. The present study retrospectively analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to explore the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of T1a‐T1c HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data for patients diagnosed with either HER2‐/HoR+or HER2+/HoR‐ T1a‐T1c breast cancer between 2010 and 2012 were obtained from SEER program. Survival analyses were conducted by Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox proportion hazard regression. RESULTS: Totally, 2648 HER2+/HoR‐ and 56387 HER2‐/HoR+T1a‐T1c breast cancer patients were enrolled. There was a clear trend that tumor size had a positive correlation with advanced AJCC stage (P < 0.001) and N‐stage (P < 0.001). T1a and T1b HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer had great homogeneity in that these two subgroups had comparable survival and both showed no significant survival difference with its counterpart of HER2‐/HoR+subtype. Conversely, T1c HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancers revealed worse prognosis than T1a/T1b HER2+/HoR‐ and T1c HER2‐/HoR+tumors (BCSS HR 3.847, P < 0.001; OS HR 2.055, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: T1a and T1b HER2+/HoR‐ breast cancer had favorable prognosis and great homogeneity, indicating 1.0 cm may be a suitable cutoff for subclassification of T1 cancer. Future randomized clinical trials were warranted to verify this hypothesis and elucidate the biological behavior of small T1 tumor to facilitate precise medicine. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6246936/ /pubmed/30277006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1785 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Wang, Changjun
Zhou, Yidong
Zhu, Hanjiang
Huang, Wei
Chen, Ziyuan
Mao, Feng
Lin, Yan
Zhang, Xiaohui
Shen, Songjie
Zhong, Ying
Li, Yan
Sun, Qiang
Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title_full Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title_fullStr Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title_short Would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pT1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and HER2‐positive breast cancer?
title_sort would 1.0 cm be a more suitable cutoff to subdivide pt1 tumors in hormone receptor‐negative and her2‐positive breast cancer?
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277006
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1785
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchangjun would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT zhouyidong would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT zhuhanjiang would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT huangwei would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT chenziyuan would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT maofeng would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT linyan would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT zhangxiaohui would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT shensongjie would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT zhongying would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT liyan would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer
AT sunqiang would10cmbeamoresuitablecutofftosubdividept1tumorsinhormonereceptornegativeandher2positivebreastcancer