Cargando…

Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavragani, Amaryllis, Ochoa, Gabriela, Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401664
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366
_version_ 1783372414685544448
author Mavragani, Amaryllis
Ochoa, Gabriela
Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P
author_facet Mavragani, Amaryllis
Ochoa, Gabriela
Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P
author_sort Mavragani, Amaryllis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term “Google Trends” in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling. RESULTS: All the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6246971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62469712018-12-13 Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review Mavragani, Amaryllis Ochoa, Gabriela Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term “Google Trends” in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling. RESULTS: All the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise. JMIR Publications 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6246971/ /pubmed/30401664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 Text en ©Amaryllis Mavragani, Gabriela Ochoa, Konstantinos P Tsagarakis. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.11.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Mavragani, Amaryllis
Ochoa, Gabriela
Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P
Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title_full Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title_short Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
title_sort assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in google trends research: systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401664
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366
work_keys_str_mv AT mavraganiamaryllis assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview
AT ochoagabriela assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview
AT tsagarakiskonstantinosp assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview