Cargando…
Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. G...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 |
_version_ | 1783372414685544448 |
---|---|
author | Mavragani, Amaryllis Ochoa, Gabriela Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P |
author_facet | Mavragani, Amaryllis Ochoa, Gabriela Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P |
author_sort | Mavragani, Amaryllis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term “Google Trends” in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling. RESULTS: All the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6246971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62469712018-12-13 Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review Mavragani, Amaryllis Ochoa, Gabriela Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: In the era of information overload, are big data analytics the answer to access and better manage available knowledge? Over the last decade, the use of Web-based data in public health issues, that is, infodemiology, has been proven useful in assessing various aspects of human behavior. Google Trends is the most popular tool to gather such information, and it has been used in several topics up to this point, with health and medicine being the most focused subject. Web-based behavior is monitored and analyzed in order to examine actual human behavior so as to predict, better assess, and even prevent health-related issues that constantly arise in everyday life. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed at reporting and further presenting and analyzing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches for Google Trends (infodemiology) studies in health-related topics from 2006 to 2016 to provide an overview of the usefulness of said tool and be a point of reference for future research on the subject. METHODS: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for selecting studies, we searched for the term “Google Trends” in the Scopus and PubMed databases from 2006 to 2016, applying specific criteria for types of publications and topics. A total of 109 published papers were extracted, excluding duplicates and those that did not fall inside the topics of health and medicine or the selected article types. We then further categorized the published papers according to their methodological approach, namely, visualization, seasonality, correlations, forecasting, and modeling. RESULTS: All the examined papers comprised, by definition, time series analysis, and all but two included data visualization. A total of 23.1% (24/104) studies used Google Trends data for examining seasonality, while 39.4% (41/104) and 32.7% (34/104) of the studies used correlations and modeling, respectively. Only 8.7% (9/104) of the studies used Google Trends data for predictions and forecasting in health-related topics; therefore, it is evident that a gap exists in forecasting using Google Trends data. CONCLUSIONS: The monitoring of online queries can provide insight into human behavior, as this field is significantly and continuously growing and will be proven more than valuable in the future for assessing behavioral changes and providing ground for research using data that could not have been accessed otherwise. JMIR Publications 2018-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6246971/ /pubmed/30401664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 Text en ©Amaryllis Mavragani, Gabriela Ochoa, Konstantinos P Tsagarakis. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 06.11.2018. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Review Mavragani, Amaryllis Ochoa, Gabriela Tsagarakis, Konstantinos P Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title | Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title_full | Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title_short | Assessing the Methods, Tools, and Statistical Approaches in Google Trends Research: Systematic Review |
title_sort | assessing the methods, tools, and statistical approaches in google trends research: systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6246971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30401664 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mavraganiamaryllis assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview AT ochoagabriela assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview AT tsagarakiskonstantinosp assessingthemethodstoolsandstatisticalapproachesingoogletrendsresearchsystematicreview |