Cargando…
AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The detection of driver oncogenes of lung cancer is of great importance. There are various gene detection techniques nowadays which are different from each other. We carried out this study to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of assay panels based on an Amplificat...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
中国肺癌杂志编辑部
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.11.02 |
_version_ | 1783372425217441792 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The detection of driver oncogenes of lung cancer is of great importance. There are various gene detection techniques nowadays which are different from each other. We carried out this study to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of assay panels based on an Amplification Refractory Mutation System-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) technique of Amplification Mutation Specific System (AMSS) in detection of lung cancer gene mutation. To estimate the applicable value of assay panels in clinical settings. METHODS: We collected cancer tissue specimens or fluid specimens from 309 patients. Mutation results were presented for those samples previously detected by ARMS-PCR. In comparison, we carried out AMSS-PCR using (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) assay panel and Six-Alliance assay panel as well as Sanger sequencing. Software SPSS 22.0 (SPSS IBM) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The rates of consistency between the results by assay panels and Sanger sequencing or ARMS-PCR were 97.41% and 97.73%, respectively. Besides, EGFR assay panel had higher consistency rates with other detection methods than Six-Alliance assay panel. As for consistency test, the Kappa values of assay panels with Sanger sequencing, assay panels with ARMS-PCR, and ARMS-PCR with Sanger sequencing were 0.946, 0.953, and 0.913, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under curve (AUC) of assay panels was 0.976 referring to Sanger sequencing, and 0.975 as ARMS-PCR was referred to. CONCLUSION: AMSS-PCR can make an optimal cancer gene mutation detection method for clinical settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6247010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62470102018-12-05 AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi 临床研究 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The detection of driver oncogenes of lung cancer is of great importance. There are various gene detection techniques nowadays which are different from each other. We carried out this study to investigate the specificity and sensitivity of assay panels based on an Amplification Refractory Mutation System-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) technique of Amplification Mutation Specific System (AMSS) in detection of lung cancer gene mutation. To estimate the applicable value of assay panels in clinical settings. METHODS: We collected cancer tissue specimens or fluid specimens from 309 patients. Mutation results were presented for those samples previously detected by ARMS-PCR. In comparison, we carried out AMSS-PCR using (epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR) assay panel and Six-Alliance assay panel as well as Sanger sequencing. Software SPSS 22.0 (SPSS IBM) was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The rates of consistency between the results by assay panels and Sanger sequencing or ARMS-PCR were 97.41% and 97.73%, respectively. Besides, EGFR assay panel had higher consistency rates with other detection methods than Six-Alliance assay panel. As for consistency test, the Kappa values of assay panels with Sanger sequencing, assay panels with ARMS-PCR, and ARMS-PCR with Sanger sequencing were 0.946, 0.953, and 0.913, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) area under curve (AUC) of assay panels was 0.976 referring to Sanger sequencing, and 0.975 as ARMS-PCR was referred to. CONCLUSION: AMSS-PCR can make an optimal cancer gene mutation detection method for clinical settings. 中国肺癌杂志编辑部 2018-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6247010/ /pubmed/30454542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.11.02 Text en 版权所有©《中国肺癌杂志》编辑部2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 3.0) License. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | 临床研究 AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title | AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title_full | AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title_fullStr | AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title_full_unstemmed | AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title_short | AMSS-PCR在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
title_sort | amss-pcr在肺癌突变基因检测中的价值研究 |
topic | 临床研究 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30454542 http://dx.doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2018.11.02 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū AT amsspcrzàifèiáitūbiànjīyīnjiǎncèzhōngdejiàzhíyánjiū |