Cargando…

Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review

Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cancer-related cause of death worldwide. In locally advanced tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been introduced in most international Western guidelines. For metastatic and unresectable disease, there is still debate regarding correct managemen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zurleni, Tommaso, Gjoni, Elson, Altomare, Michele, Rausei, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30487951
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.398
_version_ 1783372447509118976
author Zurleni, Tommaso
Gjoni, Elson
Altomare, Michele
Rausei, Stefano
author_facet Zurleni, Tommaso
Gjoni, Elson
Altomare, Michele
Rausei, Stefano
author_sort Zurleni, Tommaso
collection PubMed
description Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cancer-related cause of death worldwide. In locally advanced tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been introduced in most international Western guidelines. For metastatic and unresectable disease, there is still debate regarding correct management and the role of surgery. The standard approach for stage IV GC is palliative chemotherapy. Over the last decade, an increasing number of M1 patients who responded to palliative regimens of induction chemotherapy have been subsequently undergone surgery with curative intent. The objective of the present review is to analyze the literature regarding this approach, known as “conversion surgery”, which has become one of the most commonly adopted therapeutic options. It is defined as a treatment aiming at an R0 resection after chemotherapy in initially unresectable tumors. The 13 retrospective studies analyzed, with a total of 411 patients treated with conversion therapy, clearly show that even if standardization of unresectable and metastatic criteria, post-chemotherapy resectability evaluation and timing of surgery has not yet been established, an R0 surgery after induction chemotherapy with partial or complete response seems to offer superior survival results than chemotherapy alone. Additional larger sample-size randomized control trials are needed to identify subgroups of well-stratified patients who could benefit from this multimodal approach.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6247102
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62471022018-11-28 Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review Zurleni, Tommaso Gjoni, Elson Altomare, Michele Rausei, Stefano World J Gastrointest Oncol Minireviews Gastric cancer (GC) is the third most common cancer-related cause of death worldwide. In locally advanced tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has recently been introduced in most international Western guidelines. For metastatic and unresectable disease, there is still debate regarding correct management and the role of surgery. The standard approach for stage IV GC is palliative chemotherapy. Over the last decade, an increasing number of M1 patients who responded to palliative regimens of induction chemotherapy have been subsequently undergone surgery with curative intent. The objective of the present review is to analyze the literature regarding this approach, known as “conversion surgery”, which has become one of the most commonly adopted therapeutic options. It is defined as a treatment aiming at an R0 resection after chemotherapy in initially unresectable tumors. The 13 retrospective studies analyzed, with a total of 411 patients treated with conversion therapy, clearly show that even if standardization of unresectable and metastatic criteria, post-chemotherapy resectability evaluation and timing of surgery has not yet been established, an R0 surgery after induction chemotherapy with partial or complete response seems to offer superior survival results than chemotherapy alone. Additional larger sample-size randomized control trials are needed to identify subgroups of well-stratified patients who could benefit from this multimodal approach. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2018-11-15 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6247102/ /pubmed/30487951 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.398 Text en ©The Author(s) 2018. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Minireviews
Zurleni, Tommaso
Gjoni, Elson
Altomare, Michele
Rausei, Stefano
Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title_full Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title_fullStr Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title_full_unstemmed Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title_short Conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: A review
title_sort conversion surgery for gastric cancer patients: a review
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247102/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30487951
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v10.i11.398
work_keys_str_mv AT zurlenitommaso conversionsurgeryforgastriccancerpatientsareview
AT gjonielson conversionsurgeryforgastriccancerpatientsareview
AT altomaremichele conversionsurgeryforgastriccancerpatientsareview
AT rauseistefano conversionsurgeryforgastriccancerpatientsareview