Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation

PURPOSE: To compare the functional and clinical outcomes of the iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) placed on the anterior versus posterior surface of the iris. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study. Data on eyes that underwent anterior or retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mora, Paolo, Calzetti, Giacomo, Favilla, Stefania, Forlini, Matteo, Tedesco, Salvatore, Date, Purva, Tagliavini, Viola, Carta, Arturo, Frisina, Rino, Pedrotti, Emilio, Gandolfi, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8463569
_version_ 1783372503600594944
author Mora, Paolo
Calzetti, Giacomo
Favilla, Stefania
Forlini, Matteo
Tedesco, Salvatore
Date, Purva
Tagliavini, Viola
Carta, Arturo
Frisina, Rino
Pedrotti, Emilio
Gandolfi, Stefano
author_facet Mora, Paolo
Calzetti, Giacomo
Favilla, Stefania
Forlini, Matteo
Tedesco, Salvatore
Date, Purva
Tagliavini, Viola
Carta, Arturo
Frisina, Rino
Pedrotti, Emilio
Gandolfi, Stefano
author_sort Mora, Paolo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the functional and clinical outcomes of the iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) placed on the anterior versus posterior surface of the iris. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study. Data on eyes that underwent anterior or retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation because of inadequate capsular support secondary to complicated cataract surgery, trauma, and dislocated/opacified IOLs since January 2015 were analyzed. For study inclusion, evaluation results had to be available in the medical records both preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months after implantation. The following parameters were compared between the groups: best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive error, endothelial cell density (ECD), central macular thickness (CMT), and percentage and type of postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 60 eyes of 60 patients aged 73 ± 13 years were included: 28 eyes (47%) involved anterior, and 32 eyes (53%) retropupillary, iris-claw IOL fixations. Preoperatively, the groups were similar in all parameters except for a significantly higher proportion of retropupillary fixations in patients who had previously experienced a closed-globe trauma (p=0.03). The groups showed comparable improvements in BCDVA after surgery (final BCDVA: 0.34 ± 0.45 vs. 0.37 ± 0.50 logMAR in the anterior and retropupillary placement groups, respectively). During follow-up, no group difference was observed in refractive error or CMT. Both groups experienced similarly marked ECD loss and showed similar incidence of postoperative complications, with cystoid macular edema being the most common complication. Multivariable linear regression showed that BCDVA at 1 month was the best predictor of the final BCDVA. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior chamber and posterior chamber iris-claw IOL fixations proved equally effective and safe for aphakic correction in eyes with inadequate capsular support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6247566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62475662018-12-06 Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation Mora, Paolo Calzetti, Giacomo Favilla, Stefania Forlini, Matteo Tedesco, Salvatore Date, Purva Tagliavini, Viola Carta, Arturo Frisina, Rino Pedrotti, Emilio Gandolfi, Stefano J Ophthalmol Clinical Study PURPOSE: To compare the functional and clinical outcomes of the iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) placed on the anterior versus posterior surface of the iris. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective study. Data on eyes that underwent anterior or retropupillary iris-claw IOL implantation because of inadequate capsular support secondary to complicated cataract surgery, trauma, and dislocated/opacified IOLs since January 2015 were analyzed. For study inclusion, evaluation results had to be available in the medical records both preoperatively and at 1 and 12 months after implantation. The following parameters were compared between the groups: best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive error, endothelial cell density (ECD), central macular thickness (CMT), and percentage and type of postoperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 60 eyes of 60 patients aged 73 ± 13 years were included: 28 eyes (47%) involved anterior, and 32 eyes (53%) retropupillary, iris-claw IOL fixations. Preoperatively, the groups were similar in all parameters except for a significantly higher proportion of retropupillary fixations in patients who had previously experienced a closed-globe trauma (p=0.03). The groups showed comparable improvements in BCDVA after surgery (final BCDVA: 0.34 ± 0.45 vs. 0.37 ± 0.50 logMAR in the anterior and retropupillary placement groups, respectively). During follow-up, no group difference was observed in refractive error or CMT. Both groups experienced similarly marked ECD loss and showed similar incidence of postoperative complications, with cystoid macular edema being the most common complication. Multivariable linear regression showed that BCDVA at 1 month was the best predictor of the final BCDVA. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior chamber and posterior chamber iris-claw IOL fixations proved equally effective and safe for aphakic correction in eyes with inadequate capsular support. Hindawi 2018-11-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6247566/ /pubmed/30524757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8463569 Text en Copyright © 2018 Paolo Mora et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mora, Paolo
Calzetti, Giacomo
Favilla, Stefania
Forlini, Matteo
Tedesco, Salvatore
Date, Purva
Tagliavini, Viola
Carta, Arturo
Frisina, Rino
Pedrotti, Emilio
Gandolfi, Stefano
Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title_full Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title_short Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Functional Outcomes of Anterior versus Retropupillary Iris-Claw IOL Fixation
title_sort comparative analysis of the safety and functional outcomes of anterior versus retropupillary iris-claw iol fixation
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30524757
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8463569
work_keys_str_mv AT morapaolo comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT calzettigiacomo comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT favillastefania comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT forlinimatteo comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT tedescosalvatore comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT datepurva comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT tagliaviniviola comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT cartaarturo comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT frisinarino comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT pedrottiemilio comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation
AT gandolfistefano comparativeanalysisofthesafetyandfunctionaloutcomesofanteriorversusretropupillaryirisclawiolfixation