Cargando…
Borderline grades in high stakes clinical examinations: resolving examiner uncertainty
BACKGROUND: Objective Structured Clinical Exams are used to increase reliability and validity, yet they only achieve a modest level of reliability. This low reliability is due in part to examiner variance which is greater than the variance of students. This variance often represents indecisiveness a...
Autores principales: | Shulruf, Boaz, Adelstein, Barbara-Ann, Damodaran, Arvin, Harris, Peter, Kennedy, Sean, O’Sullivan, Anthony, Taylor, Silas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1382-0 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Enhancing the defensibility of examiners’ marks in high stake OSCEs
por: Shulruf, Boaz, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The sights and insights of examiners in objective structured clinical examinations
por: Chong, Lauren, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Examiner seniority and experience are associated with bias when scoring communication, but not examination, skills in objective structured clinical examinations in Australia
por: Chong, Lauren, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Predictive validity of a tool to resolve borderline grades in OSCEs
por: Klein Nulend, Rowan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Australian medical students have fewer opportunities to do physical examination of peers of the opposite gender
por: Taylor, Silas, et al.
Publicado: (2016)