Cargando…
Searching Embase and MEDLINE by using only major descriptors or title and abstract fields: a prospective exploratory study
BACKGROUND: Researchers performing systematic reviews (SRs) must carefully consider the relevance of thousands of citations retrieved from bibliographic database searches, the majority of which will be excluded later on close inspection. Well-developed bibliographic searches are generally created wi...
Autores principales: | Bramer, Wichor M., Giustini, Dean, Kleijnen, Jos, Franco, Oscar H. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-018-0864-9 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study
por: Bramer, Wichor M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Are men difficult to find? Identifying male-specific studies in MEDLINE and Embase
por: Stewart, Fiona, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Identifying observational studies of surgical interventions in MEDLINE and EMBASE
por: Fraser, Cynthia, et al.
Publicado: (2006) -
Has Embase replaced MEDLINE since coverage expansion?
por: Lam, Michael Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews
por: Bramer, Wichor M, et al.
Publicado: (2013)