Cargando…

Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis

BACKGROUND: There are multiple existing and emerging therapeutic avenues for metastatic prostate cancer, with a common denominator, which is the need for predictive biomarkers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to cost-efficiently accelerate precision medicine trials to improve clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mayrhofer, Markus, De Laere, Bram, Whitington, Tom, Van Oyen, Peter, Ghysel, Christophe, Ampe, Jozef, Ost, Piet, Demey, Wim, Hoekx, Lucien, Schrijvers, Dirk, Brouwers, Barbara, Lybaert, Willem, Everaert, Els, De Maeseneer, Daan, Strijbos, Michiel, Bols, Alain, Fransis, Karen, Oeyen, Steffi, van Dam, Pieter-Jan, Van den Eynden, Gert, Rutten, Annemie, Aly, Markus, Nordström, Tobias, Van Laere, Steven, Rantalainen, Mattias, Rajan, Prabhakar, Egevad, Lars, Ullén, Anders, Yachnin, Jeffrey, Dirix, Luc, Grönberg, Henrik, Lindberg, Johan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0595-5
_version_ 1783372551970357248
author Mayrhofer, Markus
De Laere, Bram
Whitington, Tom
Van Oyen, Peter
Ghysel, Christophe
Ampe, Jozef
Ost, Piet
Demey, Wim
Hoekx, Lucien
Schrijvers, Dirk
Brouwers, Barbara
Lybaert, Willem
Everaert, Els
De Maeseneer, Daan
Strijbos, Michiel
Bols, Alain
Fransis, Karen
Oeyen, Steffi
van Dam, Pieter-Jan
Van den Eynden, Gert
Rutten, Annemie
Aly, Markus
Nordström, Tobias
Van Laere, Steven
Rantalainen, Mattias
Rajan, Prabhakar
Egevad, Lars
Ullén, Anders
Yachnin, Jeffrey
Dirix, Luc
Grönberg, Henrik
Lindberg, Johan
author_facet Mayrhofer, Markus
De Laere, Bram
Whitington, Tom
Van Oyen, Peter
Ghysel, Christophe
Ampe, Jozef
Ost, Piet
Demey, Wim
Hoekx, Lucien
Schrijvers, Dirk
Brouwers, Barbara
Lybaert, Willem
Everaert, Els
De Maeseneer, Daan
Strijbos, Michiel
Bols, Alain
Fransis, Karen
Oeyen, Steffi
van Dam, Pieter-Jan
Van den Eynden, Gert
Rutten, Annemie
Aly, Markus
Nordström, Tobias
Van Laere, Steven
Rantalainen, Mattias
Rajan, Prabhakar
Egevad, Lars
Ullén, Anders
Yachnin, Jeffrey
Dirix, Luc
Grönberg, Henrik
Lindberg, Johan
author_sort Mayrhofer, Markus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are multiple existing and emerging therapeutic avenues for metastatic prostate cancer, with a common denominator, which is the need for predictive biomarkers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to cost-efficiently accelerate precision medicine trials to improve clinical efficacy and diminish costs and toxicity. However, comprehensive ctDNA profiling in metastatic prostate cancer to date has been limited. METHODS: A combination of targeted and low-pass whole genome sequencing was performed on plasma cell-free DNA and matched white blood cell germline DNA in 364 blood samples from 217 metastatic prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: ctDNA was detected in 85.9% of baseline samples, correlated to line of therapy and was mirrored by circulating tumor cell enumeration of synchronous blood samples. Comprehensive profiling of the androgen receptor (AR) revealed a continuous increase in the fraction of patients with intra-AR structural variation, from 15.4% during first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy to 45.2% in fourth line, indicating a continuous evolution of AR during the course of the disease. Patients displayed frequent alterations in DNA repair deficiency genes (18.0%). Additionally, the microsatellite instability phenotype was identified in 3.81% of eligible samples (≥ 0.1 ctDNA fraction). Sequencing of non-repetitive intronic and exonic regions of PTEN, RB1, and TP53 detected biallelic inactivation in 47.5%, 20.3%, and 44.1% of samples with ≥ 0.2 ctDNA fraction, respectively. Only one patient carried a clonal high-impact variant without a detectable second hit. Intronic high-impact structural variation was twice as common as exonic mutations in PTEN and RB1. Finally, 14.6% of patients presented false positive variants due to clonal hematopoiesis, commonly ignored in commercially available assays. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA profiles appear to mirror the genomic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer tissue and may cost-efficiently provide somatic information in clinical trials designed to identify predictive biomarkers. However, intronic sequencing of the interrogated tumor suppressors challenges the ubiquitous focus on coding regions and is vital, together with profiling of synchronous white blood cells, to minimize erroneous assignments which in turn may confound results and impede true associations in clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0595-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6247769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62477692018-11-26 Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis Mayrhofer, Markus De Laere, Bram Whitington, Tom Van Oyen, Peter Ghysel, Christophe Ampe, Jozef Ost, Piet Demey, Wim Hoekx, Lucien Schrijvers, Dirk Brouwers, Barbara Lybaert, Willem Everaert, Els De Maeseneer, Daan Strijbos, Michiel Bols, Alain Fransis, Karen Oeyen, Steffi van Dam, Pieter-Jan Van den Eynden, Gert Rutten, Annemie Aly, Markus Nordström, Tobias Van Laere, Steven Rantalainen, Mattias Rajan, Prabhakar Egevad, Lars Ullén, Anders Yachnin, Jeffrey Dirix, Luc Grönberg, Henrik Lindberg, Johan Genome Med Research BACKGROUND: There are multiple existing and emerging therapeutic avenues for metastatic prostate cancer, with a common denominator, which is the need for predictive biomarkers. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has the potential to cost-efficiently accelerate precision medicine trials to improve clinical efficacy and diminish costs and toxicity. However, comprehensive ctDNA profiling in metastatic prostate cancer to date has been limited. METHODS: A combination of targeted and low-pass whole genome sequencing was performed on plasma cell-free DNA and matched white blood cell germline DNA in 364 blood samples from 217 metastatic prostate cancer patients. RESULTS: ctDNA was detected in 85.9% of baseline samples, correlated to line of therapy and was mirrored by circulating tumor cell enumeration of synchronous blood samples. Comprehensive profiling of the androgen receptor (AR) revealed a continuous increase in the fraction of patients with intra-AR structural variation, from 15.4% during first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer therapy to 45.2% in fourth line, indicating a continuous evolution of AR during the course of the disease. Patients displayed frequent alterations in DNA repair deficiency genes (18.0%). Additionally, the microsatellite instability phenotype was identified in 3.81% of eligible samples (≥ 0.1 ctDNA fraction). Sequencing of non-repetitive intronic and exonic regions of PTEN, RB1, and TP53 detected biallelic inactivation in 47.5%, 20.3%, and 44.1% of samples with ≥ 0.2 ctDNA fraction, respectively. Only one patient carried a clonal high-impact variant without a detectable second hit. Intronic high-impact structural variation was twice as common as exonic mutations in PTEN and RB1. Finally, 14.6% of patients presented false positive variants due to clonal hematopoiesis, commonly ignored in commercially available assays. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA profiles appear to mirror the genomic landscape of metastatic prostate cancer tissue and may cost-efficiently provide somatic information in clinical trials designed to identify predictive biomarkers. However, intronic sequencing of the interrogated tumor suppressors challenges the ubiquitous focus on coding regions and is vital, together with profiling of synchronous white blood cells, to minimize erroneous assignments which in turn may confound results and impede true associations in clinical trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13073-018-0595-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6247769/ /pubmed/30458854 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0595-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mayrhofer, Markus
De Laere, Bram
Whitington, Tom
Van Oyen, Peter
Ghysel, Christophe
Ampe, Jozef
Ost, Piet
Demey, Wim
Hoekx, Lucien
Schrijvers, Dirk
Brouwers, Barbara
Lybaert, Willem
Everaert, Els
De Maeseneer, Daan
Strijbos, Michiel
Bols, Alain
Fransis, Karen
Oeyen, Steffi
van Dam, Pieter-Jan
Van den Eynden, Gert
Rutten, Annemie
Aly, Markus
Nordström, Tobias
Van Laere, Steven
Rantalainen, Mattias
Rajan, Prabhakar
Egevad, Lars
Ullén, Anders
Yachnin, Jeffrey
Dirix, Luc
Grönberg, Henrik
Lindberg, Johan
Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title_full Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title_fullStr Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title_full_unstemmed Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title_short Cell-free DNA profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
title_sort cell-free dna profiling of metastatic prostate cancer reveals microsatellite instability, structural rearrangements and clonal hematopoiesis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6247769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30458854
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13073-018-0595-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mayrhofermarkus cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT delaerebram cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT whitingtontom cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT vanoyenpeter cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT ghyselchristophe cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT ampejozef cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT ostpiet cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT demeywim cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT hoekxlucien cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT schrijversdirk cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT brouwersbarbara cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT lybaertwillem cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT everaertels cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT demaeseneerdaan cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT strijbosmichiel cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT bolsalain cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT fransiskaren cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT oeyensteffi cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT vandampieterjan cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT vandeneyndengert cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT ruttenannemie cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT alymarkus cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT nordstromtobias cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT vanlaeresteven cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT rantalainenmattias cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT rajanprabhakar cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT egevadlars cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT ullenanders cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT yachninjeffrey cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT dirixluc cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT gronberghenrik cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis
AT lindbergjohan cellfreednaprofilingofmetastaticprostatecancerrevealsmicrosatelliteinstabilitystructuralrearrangementsandclonalhematopoiesis