Cargando…

Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The strategy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) originated for initially resectable and transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to preclude upfront transplantation, with SLT in the case of recurrence. However, SLT remains a controversial approach in comparison to primary liver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Dipesh Kumar, Chen, Wei, Bai, Xueli, Singh, Alina, Li, Guogang, Ma, Tao, Yu, Xiazhen, Xiao, Zhi, Huang, Bingfeng, Liang, Tingbo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072683
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.908623
_version_ 1783372583982333952
author Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
Chen, Wei
Bai, Xueli
Singh, Alina
Li, Guogang
Ma, Tao
Yu, Xiazhen
Xiao, Zhi
Huang, Bingfeng
Liang, Tingbo
author_facet Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
Chen, Wei
Bai, Xueli
Singh, Alina
Li, Guogang
Ma, Tao
Yu, Xiazhen
Xiao, Zhi
Huang, Bingfeng
Liang, Tingbo
author_sort Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The strategy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) originated for initially resectable and transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to preclude upfront transplantation, with SLT in the case of recurrence. However, SLT remains a controversial approach in comparison to primary liver transplant (PLT). The aim of our study was to conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the short-term outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between SLT and PLT for patients with HCC, stratifying results according to the Milan criteria and donor types. MATERIAL/METHODS: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing SLT and PLT. A fixed effects model and a random effects model meta-analysis were conducted to assess the short-term outcomes, OS, and DFS based on the evaluation of heterogeneity. RESULTS: SLT had superior 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and DFS compared with that of PLT. After classifying data according to donor type and Milan criteria, our meta-analysis revealed: that for deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients, there were no significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate between the SLT group and the PLT group. However, the 5-year OS rate was superior in the SLT group compared to the PLT group. Similarly, SLT had superior 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rate compared to PLT in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Moreover, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DFS were also superior in SLT compared to PLT in both the DDLT and LDLT recipients. In patients within Milan criteria there were no statistically significant differences in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and DFS between the SLT group and the PLT group. Similarly, in patients beyond Milan criteria, both SLT and PLT showed no significant difference for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis included the largest number of studies comparing SLT and PLT, and SLT was found to have significantly better OS and DFS. Moreover, this meta-analysis suggests that SLT has comparable postoperative complications to that of PLT, and thus, SLT may be a better treatment strategy for recurrent HCC patients and patients with compensated liver, whenever feasible, considering the severe organ limitation and the safety of SLT. However, PLT can be referred as a treatment strategy for HCC patients with cirrhotic and decompensated liver.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6248033
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62480332018-11-28 Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Yadav, Dipesh Kumar Chen, Wei Bai, Xueli Singh, Alina Li, Guogang Ma, Tao Yu, Xiazhen Xiao, Zhi Huang, Bingfeng Liang, Tingbo Ann Transplant Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: The strategy of salvage liver transplantation (SLT) originated for initially resectable and transplantable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to preclude upfront transplantation, with SLT in the case of recurrence. However, SLT remains a controversial approach in comparison to primary liver transplant (PLT). The aim of our study was to conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis to assess the short-term outcomes, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS) between SLT and PLT for patients with HCC, stratifying results according to the Milan criteria and donor types. MATERIAL/METHODS: A search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was conducted to identify studies comparing SLT and PLT. A fixed effects model and a random effects model meta-analysis were conducted to assess the short-term outcomes, OS, and DFS based on the evaluation of heterogeneity. RESULTS: SLT had superior 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and DFS compared with that of PLT. After classifying data according to donor type and Milan criteria, our meta-analysis revealed: that for deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) recipients, there were no significant differences in 1-year and 3-year OS rate between the SLT group and the PLT group. However, the 5-year OS rate was superior in the SLT group compared to the PLT group. Similarly, SLT had superior 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rate compared to PLT in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Moreover, 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DFS were also superior in SLT compared to PLT in both the DDLT and LDLT recipients. In patients within Milan criteria there were no statistically significant differences in 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS and DFS between the SLT group and the PLT group. Similarly, in patients beyond Milan criteria, both SLT and PLT showed no significant difference for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rate. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis included the largest number of studies comparing SLT and PLT, and SLT was found to have significantly better OS and DFS. Moreover, this meta-analysis suggests that SLT has comparable postoperative complications to that of PLT, and thus, SLT may be a better treatment strategy for recurrent HCC patients and patients with compensated liver, whenever feasible, considering the severe organ limitation and the safety of SLT. However, PLT can be referred as a treatment strategy for HCC patients with cirrhotic and decompensated liver. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6248033/ /pubmed/30072683 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.908623 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Yadav, Dipesh Kumar
Chen, Wei
Bai, Xueli
Singh, Alina
Li, Guogang
Ma, Tao
Yu, Xiazhen
Xiao, Zhi
Huang, Bingfeng
Liang, Tingbo
Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_fullStr Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_short Salvage Liver Transplant versus Primary Liver Transplant for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma
title_sort salvage liver transplant versus primary liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248033/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30072683
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.908623
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavdipeshkumar salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT chenwei salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT baixueli salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT singhalina salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liguogang salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT matao salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT yuxiazhen salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT xiaozhi salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT huangbingfeng salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT liangtingbo salvagelivertransplantversusprimarylivertransplantforpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma