Cargando…

Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is used in transplantation to prevent early acute rejection. The survival benefit of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction has not been established yet. We sought to determine the role of rATG in preventing rejection and improving overall survival. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jarmi, Tambi, Patel, Nirav, Aslam, Sadaf, Makdisi, George, Doumit, Elias, Mhaskar, Rahul, Miladinovic, Branko, Weston, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29915167
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907984
_version_ 1783372588958875648
author Jarmi, Tambi
Patel, Nirav
Aslam, Sadaf
Makdisi, George
Doumit, Elias
Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Weston, Mark
author_facet Jarmi, Tambi
Patel, Nirav
Aslam, Sadaf
Makdisi, George
Doumit, Elias
Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Weston, Mark
author_sort Jarmi, Tambi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is used in transplantation to prevent early acute rejection. The survival benefit of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction has not been established yet. We sought to determine the role of rATG in preventing rejection and improving overall survival. MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2005 to 2009 and data of consecutive 268 heart transplant recipients were reviewed. RESULTS: The data of 144 patients who received induction with rATG were compared to 124 patients who did not. Although overall survival was not different between the 2 groups (P=0.12), there was a significant difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 5 years (RMST=4.8 months; 95% CI: 1.0–8.6, P=0.01) and 10 years (RMST=10.4 months; 95% CI: 1.6–19.3, P=0.02) in favor of the non-induced patients. No difference was observed between induced and non-induced patients who developed de novo donor specific antibodies. There was a significant difference in median days to first rejection in favor of the induced group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Induction with rATG adds no survival benefit in heart transplant recipients. Patients who did not receive induction therapy had higher life expectancy at 5 years and 10 years. Although there was significant delay in the first rejection episode in favor of the rATG induced group, no difference was observed in donor specific antibodies. This study indicates a need for separate analysis of peri-transplantation co-morbidities and mainly the incidence of acute kidney injury, which could affect long-term survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6248055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62480552018-11-28 Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study Jarmi, Tambi Patel, Nirav Aslam, Sadaf Makdisi, George Doumit, Elias Mhaskar, Rahul Miladinovic, Branko Weston, Mark Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Induction immunosuppression is used in transplantation to prevent early acute rejection. The survival benefit of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) induction has not been established yet. We sought to determine the role of rATG in preventing rejection and improving overall survival. MATERIAL/METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2005 to 2009 and data of consecutive 268 heart transplant recipients were reviewed. RESULTS: The data of 144 patients who received induction with rATG were compared to 124 patients who did not. Although overall survival was not different between the 2 groups (P=0.12), there was a significant difference in restricted mean survival time (RMST) at 5 years (RMST=4.8 months; 95% CI: 1.0–8.6, P=0.01) and 10 years (RMST=10.4 months; 95% CI: 1.6–19.3, P=0.02) in favor of the non-induced patients. No difference was observed between induced and non-induced patients who developed de novo donor specific antibodies. There was a significant difference in median days to first rejection in favor of the induced group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Induction with rATG adds no survival benefit in heart transplant recipients. Patients who did not receive induction therapy had higher life expectancy at 5 years and 10 years. Although there was significant delay in the first rejection episode in favor of the rATG induced group, no difference was observed in donor specific antibodies. This study indicates a need for separate analysis of peri-transplantation co-morbidities and mainly the incidence of acute kidney injury, which could affect long-term survival. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6248055/ /pubmed/29915167 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907984 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Jarmi, Tambi
Patel, Nirav
Aslam, Sadaf
Makdisi, George
Doumit, Elias
Mhaskar, Rahul
Miladinovic, Branko
Weston, Mark
Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Outcomes of Induction Therapy with Rabbit Anti-Thymocyte Globulin in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort outcomes of induction therapy with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin in heart transplant recipients: a single center retrospective cohort study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29915167
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907984
work_keys_str_mv AT jarmitambi outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT patelnirav outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT aslamsadaf outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT makdisigeorge outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT doumitelias outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mhaskarrahul outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT miladinovicbranko outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT westonmark outcomesofinductiontherapywithrabbitantithymocyteglobulininhearttransplantrecipientsasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy