Cargando…
Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation
BACKGROUND: Perioperative monitoring and hemodynamic management after heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation is challenging due to 2 independently beating hearts. Telemetry allows continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters of both the donor and recipient hearts. We describe our experi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026460 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.909522 |
_version_ | 1783372593350311936 |
---|---|
author | Längin, Matthias Panelli, Alessandro Reichart, Bruno Kind, Alexander Brenner, Paolo Mayr, Tanja Abicht, Jan-Michael |
author_facet | Längin, Matthias Panelli, Alessandro Reichart, Bruno Kind, Alexander Brenner, Paolo Mayr, Tanja Abicht, Jan-Michael |
author_sort | Längin, Matthias |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Perioperative monitoring and hemodynamic management after heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation is challenging due to 2 independently beating hearts. Telemetry allows continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters of both the donor and recipient hearts. We describe our experience and report on the validity of a telemetric system during and after surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: Wireless telemetry transmitters were implanted in 3 baboons receiving porcine donor hearts. Left ventricular pressure and ECG were assessed from the donor heart, whereas aortic pressure and temperature were assessed from the recipient. Telemetric data were validated with invasive blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: Telemetric blood pressure was lower than invasive blood pressure. Intraoperatively, the probe in the graft’s left ventricle measured negative end-diastolic pressures. Telemetry allowed simple discrimination between donor’s and recipient’s heart rates. Body temperature was underestimated by telemetry. Telemetric monitoring facilitates recognition of graft arrhythmias and volume demand. CONCLUSIONS: In heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation, telemetric implants are useful tools to continuously monitor the animals’ hemodynamic parameters and to discriminate donor and recipient organs. Accuracy is sufficient for systemic pressure measurement, but perioperative use of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure as a surrogate parameter for graft function is not advisable. Temperature measurements by telemetry do not reflect body core temperature. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6248073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62480732018-11-28 Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation Längin, Matthias Panelli, Alessandro Reichart, Bruno Kind, Alexander Brenner, Paolo Mayr, Tanja Abicht, Jan-Michael Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Perioperative monitoring and hemodynamic management after heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation is challenging due to 2 independently beating hearts. Telemetry allows continuous monitoring of hemodynamic parameters of both the donor and recipient hearts. We describe our experience and report on the validity of a telemetric system during and after surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: Wireless telemetry transmitters were implanted in 3 baboons receiving porcine donor hearts. Left ventricular pressure and ECG were assessed from the donor heart, whereas aortic pressure and temperature were assessed from the recipient. Telemetric data were validated with invasive blood pressure measurements. RESULTS: Telemetric blood pressure was lower than invasive blood pressure. Intraoperatively, the probe in the graft’s left ventricle measured negative end-diastolic pressures. Telemetry allowed simple discrimination between donor’s and recipient’s heart rates. Body temperature was underestimated by telemetry. Telemetric monitoring facilitates recognition of graft arrhythmias and volume demand. CONCLUSIONS: In heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation, telemetric implants are useful tools to continuously monitor the animals’ hemodynamic parameters and to discriminate donor and recipient organs. Accuracy is sufficient for systemic pressure measurement, but perioperative use of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure as a surrogate parameter for graft function is not advisable. Temperature measurements by telemetry do not reflect body core temperature. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6248073/ /pubmed/30026460 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.909522 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ) |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Längin, Matthias Panelli, Alessandro Reichart, Bruno Kind, Alexander Brenner, Paolo Mayr, Tanja Abicht, Jan-Michael Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title | Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title_full | Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title_fullStr | Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title_short | Perioperative Telemetric Monitoring in Pig-to-Baboon Heterotopic Thoracic Cardiac Xenotransplantation |
title_sort | perioperative telemetric monitoring in pig-to-baboon heterotopic thoracic cardiac xenotransplantation |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30026460 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.909522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT langinmatthias perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT panellialessandro perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT reichartbruno perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT kindalexander perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT brennerpaolo perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT mayrtanja perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation AT abichtjanmichael perioperativetelemetricmonitoringinpigtobaboonheterotopicthoraciccardiacxenotransplantation |