Cargando…

Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation. MATERIAL/METHODS: Searches were conducted in Cochr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nacif, Lucas Souto, Zanini, Leonardo Yuri, Sartori, Vinicius Farina, Kim, Vera, Rocha-Santos, Vinicius, Andraus, Wellington, D’Albuquerque, Luiz Carneiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323164
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.911435
_version_ 1783372595497795584
author Nacif, Lucas Souto
Zanini, Leonardo Yuri
Sartori, Vinicius Farina
Kim, Vera
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Carneiro
author_facet Nacif, Lucas Souto
Zanini, Leonardo Yuri
Sartori, Vinicius Farina
Kim, Vera
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Carneiro
author_sort Nacif, Lucas Souto
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation. MATERIAL/METHODS: Searches were conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, and updated in January 2018. The following specific outcomes of interest were defined and evaluated separated using 2 different reviews and meta-analyses for 1) hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS) and 2) temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS). Comparative studies were analyzed separately for both surgical portocaval shunt modalities. RESULTS: Only 1 well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective. Initially, we found 1479 articles. Of those selected, 853 were from PubMed/MEDLINE, 32 were from Cochrane and 594 were from EMBASE. Our meta-analysis included a total of 3232 patients for all the included studies. Results found that 41 patients with HPCS experienced increased 1-year patient survival (OR 16.33; P=0.02) and increased 1-year graft survival (OR 17.67; P=0.01). The TPCS analysis with 1633 patients found patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay (days) (P=0.006) and hospital length of stay (P=0.02) and had decreased primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR 0.30, P=0.02) and mortality rates (OR 0.52, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in relation to liver transplantation with TPCS was able to prevent PNF, decrease hospital length of stay and unit care length of stay. Furthermore, in analyzing data for patients with HPCS, we observed increases in the 1-year graft and patient survival rates. More prospective randomized trials are needed to arrive at a more precise conclusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6248172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62481722018-11-28 Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Nacif, Lucas Souto Zanini, Leonardo Yuri Sartori, Vinicius Farina Kim, Vera Rocha-Santos, Vinicius Andraus, Wellington D’Albuquerque, Luiz Carneiro Ann Transplant Meta-Analysis BACKGROUND: Expanded clinical and surgical techniques in liver transplantation can markedly improve patient and graft survival. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative portocaval shunts in liver transplantation. MATERIAL/METHODS: Searches were conducted in Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases, and updated in January 2018. The following specific outcomes of interest were defined and evaluated separated using 2 different reviews and meta-analyses for 1) hemi-portocaval shunt (HPCS) and 2) temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS). Comparative studies were analyzed separately for both surgical portocaval shunt modalities. RESULTS: Only 1 well-designed randomized controlled trial was found. Most studies were retrospective or prospective. Initially, we found 1479 articles. Of those selected, 853 were from PubMed/MEDLINE, 32 were from Cochrane and 594 were from EMBASE. Our meta-analysis included a total of 3232 patients for all the included studies. Results found that 41 patients with HPCS experienced increased 1-year patient survival (OR 16.33; P=0.02) and increased 1-year graft survival (OR 17.67; P=0.01). The TPCS analysis with 1633 patients found patients had significantly shorter intensive care unit length of stay (days) (P=0.006) and hospital length of stay (P=0.02) and had decreased primary nonfunction (PNF) (OR 0.30, P=0.02) and mortality rates (OR 0.52, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in relation to liver transplantation with TPCS was able to prevent PNF, decrease hospital length of stay and unit care length of stay. Furthermore, in analyzing data for patients with HPCS, we observed increases in the 1-year graft and patient survival rates. More prospective randomized trials are needed to arrive at a more precise conclusion. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6248172/ /pubmed/30323164 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.911435 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Meta-Analysis
Nacif, Lucas Souto
Zanini, Leonardo Yuri
Sartori, Vinicius Farina
Kim, Vera
Rocha-Santos, Vinicius
Andraus, Wellington
D’Albuquerque, Luiz Carneiro
Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort intraoperative surgical portosystemic shunt in liver transplantation: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Meta-Analysis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30323164
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.911435
work_keys_str_mv AT naciflucassouto intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zaninileonardoyuri intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sartoriviniciusfarina intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kimvera intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rochasantosvinicius intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT andrauswellington intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dalbuquerqueluizcarneiro intraoperativesurgicalportosystemicshuntinlivertransplantationsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis