Cargando…
Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) previously tested two preference elicitation methods in pilot projects and regarded them as generally feasible for prioritizing outcome-specific results of benefit assessment. The present study aimed to in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S176067 |
_version_ | 1783372597931540480 |
---|---|
author | Vennedey, Vera Derman, Sonja HM Hiligsmann, Mickaël Civello, Daniele Schwalm, Anja Seidl, Astrid Scheibler, Fülöp Stock, Stephanie Noack, Michael J Danner, Marion |
author_facet | Vennedey, Vera Derman, Sonja HM Hiligsmann, Mickaël Civello, Daniele Schwalm, Anja Seidl, Astrid Scheibler, Fülöp Stock, Stephanie Noack, Michael J Danner, Marion |
author_sort | Vennedey, Vera |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) previously tested two preference elicitation methods in pilot projects and regarded them as generally feasible for prioritizing outcome-specific results of benefit assessment. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility of completing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) within 3 months and to determine the relative importance of attributes of periodontal disease and its treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This preference elicitation was conducted alongside the IQWiG benefit assessment of systematic treatments of periodontal diseases. Attributes were defined based on the benefit assessment, literature review, and patients’ and periodontologists’ interviews. The DCE survey was completed by patients with a history of periodontal disease. Preferences were elicited for the attributes “tooth loss within next 10 years”, “own costs for treatment, follow-up visits, re-treatment”, “complaints and symptoms”, and “frequency of follow-up visits”. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire including 12 choice tasks. Data were analyzed using a random parameters logit model. The relative attribute importance was calculated based on level ranges. RESULTS: Within 3 months, survey development, data collection among 267 patients, data analysis, and provision of a study report could be completed. The analysis showed that tooth loss (score 0.73) was the most important attribute in patients’ decisions, followed by complaints and symptoms (0.22), frequency of follow-up visits (0.02), and costs (0.03) (relative importance scores summing up to 1). CONCLUSION: A preference analysis performing a DCE can be generally feasible within 3 months; however, a good research infrastructure and access to patients is required. Outcomes used in benefit assessments might need to be adapted to be used in preference analyses. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6248230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62482302018-12-03 Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study Vennedey, Vera Derman, Sonja HM Hiligsmann, Mickaël Civello, Daniele Schwalm, Anja Seidl, Astrid Scheibler, Fülöp Stock, Stephanie Noack, Michael J Danner, Marion Patient Prefer Adherence Original Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The German Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) previously tested two preference elicitation methods in pilot projects and regarded them as generally feasible for prioritizing outcome-specific results of benefit assessment. The present study aimed to investigate the feasibility of completing a discrete choice experiment (DCE) within 3 months and to determine the relative importance of attributes of periodontal disease and its treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This preference elicitation was conducted alongside the IQWiG benefit assessment of systematic treatments of periodontal diseases. Attributes were defined based on the benefit assessment, literature review, and patients’ and periodontologists’ interviews. The DCE survey was completed by patients with a history of periodontal disease. Preferences were elicited for the attributes “tooth loss within next 10 years”, “own costs for treatment, follow-up visits, re-treatment”, “complaints and symptoms”, and “frequency of follow-up visits”. Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire including 12 choice tasks. Data were analyzed using a random parameters logit model. The relative attribute importance was calculated based on level ranges. RESULTS: Within 3 months, survey development, data collection among 267 patients, data analysis, and provision of a study report could be completed. The analysis showed that tooth loss (score 0.73) was the most important attribute in patients’ decisions, followed by complaints and symptoms (0.22), frequency of follow-up visits (0.02), and costs (0.03) (relative importance scores summing up to 1). CONCLUSION: A preference analysis performing a DCE can be generally feasible within 3 months; however, a good research infrastructure and access to patients is required. Outcomes used in benefit assessments might need to be adapted to be used in preference analyses. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6248230/ /pubmed/30510407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S176067 Text en © 2018 Vennedey et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Vennedey, Vera Derman, Sonja HM Hiligsmann, Mickaël Civello, Daniele Schwalm, Anja Seidl, Astrid Scheibler, Fülöp Stock, Stephanie Noack, Michael J Danner, Marion Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title | Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title_full | Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title_short | Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
title_sort | patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an iqwig benefit assessment: a feasibility study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S176067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vennedeyvera patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT dermansonjahm patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT hiligsmannmickael patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT civellodaniele patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT schwalmanja patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT seidlastrid patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT scheiblerfulop patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT stockstephanie patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT noackmichaelj patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy AT dannermarion patientspreferencesinperiodontaldiseasetreatmentelicitedalongsideaniqwigbenefitassessmentafeasibilitystudy |