Cargando…

Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation

BACKGROUND: Ex situ liver surgery allows liver resection and vascular reconstruction in patients who have liver tumors located in critical sites. Only a small series of studies about ex situ liver surgery is available in the literature. No anesthesia management experience has been previously publish...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Fujun, Yang, Zhiyong, Zeng, Jing, Gu, Jianteng, Cui, Jian, Ning, Jiaonin, Yi, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29700275
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907796
_version_ 1783372619677958144
author Cheng, Fujun
Yang, Zhiyong
Zeng, Jing
Gu, Jianteng
Cui, Jian
Ning, Jiaonin
Yi, Bin
author_facet Cheng, Fujun
Yang, Zhiyong
Zeng, Jing
Gu, Jianteng
Cui, Jian
Ning, Jiaonin
Yi, Bin
author_sort Cheng, Fujun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ex situ liver surgery allows liver resection and vascular reconstruction in patients who have liver tumors located in critical sites. Only a small series of studies about ex situ liver surgery is available in the literature. No anesthesia management experience has been previously published. The aim of the currents study was to summarize our experience with anesthetic management of patients during ex vivo liver surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: The first 43 patients who received ex vivo liver surgery between January 2007 and April 2012 were included. A pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) were used intraoperatively in the patients to monitor the hemodynamic changes. Thromboelastogram and the plasma coagulation test were used to monitor the coagulation changes. RESULTS: All patients received general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction. The data obtained by PAC, TEE, and PiCOO in these cases showed large changes in hemodynamics during the stages of the first or second vessel reconstruction. The CI decreased about 59%/63% and the MPAP decreased about 49%/37% during the first/second vessel reconstruction. Accurate judgment of the dosage of active drug for vascular support is the key for the stabilization of hemodynamics as quickly as possible. However, a high incidence (35.5%) of prophase fibrinolysis in a long anhepatic phase should be monitored and managed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo liver surgery is no longer experimental and is a therapeutic option for patients with liver cancer in critical sites. Good anesthesia support is an essential element of liver autotransplantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6248320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62483202018-11-28 Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation Cheng, Fujun Yang, Zhiyong Zeng, Jing Gu, Jianteng Cui, Jian Ning, Jiaonin Yi, Bin Ann Transplant Original Paper BACKGROUND: Ex situ liver surgery allows liver resection and vascular reconstruction in patients who have liver tumors located in critical sites. Only a small series of studies about ex situ liver surgery is available in the literature. No anesthesia management experience has been previously published. The aim of the currents study was to summarize our experience with anesthetic management of patients during ex vivo liver surgery. MATERIAL/METHODS: The first 43 patients who received ex vivo liver surgery between January 2007 and April 2012 were included. A pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), and pulse indicator continuous cardiac output (PiCCO) were used intraoperatively in the patients to monitor the hemodynamic changes. Thromboelastogram and the plasma coagulation test were used to monitor the coagulation changes. RESULTS: All patients received general anesthesia with rapid sequence induction. The data obtained by PAC, TEE, and PiCOO in these cases showed large changes in hemodynamics during the stages of the first or second vessel reconstruction. The CI decreased about 59%/63% and the MPAP decreased about 49%/37% during the first/second vessel reconstruction. Accurate judgment of the dosage of active drug for vascular support is the key for the stabilization of hemodynamics as quickly as possible. However, a high incidence (35.5%) of prophase fibrinolysis in a long anhepatic phase should be monitored and managed. CONCLUSIONS: Ex vivo liver surgery is no longer experimental and is a therapeutic option for patients with liver cancer in critical sites. Good anesthesia support is an essential element of liver autotransplantation. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2018-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6248320/ /pubmed/29700275 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907796 Text en © Ann Transplant, 2018 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cheng, Fujun
Yang, Zhiyong
Zeng, Jing
Gu, Jianteng
Cui, Jian
Ning, Jiaonin
Yi, Bin
Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title_full Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title_fullStr Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title_full_unstemmed Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title_short Anesthesia Management of Modified Ex Vivo Liver Resection and Autotransplantation
title_sort anesthesia management of modified ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248320/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29700275
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/AOT.907796
work_keys_str_mv AT chengfujun anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT yangzhiyong anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT zengjing anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT gujianteng anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT cuijian anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT ningjiaonin anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation
AT yibin anesthesiamanagementofmodifiedexvivoliverresectionandautotransplantation