Cargando…
Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172 |
_version_ | 1783372622547910656 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Tingting Feng, Fubin Zhao, Wenge Yao, Yan Tian, Jinhui Zhou, Chao Zang, Chuanxin Liu, Cun Wang, Xue Sun, Changgang |
author_facet | Zhang, Tingting Feng, Fubin Zhao, Wenge Yao, Yan Tian, Jinhui Zhou, Chao Zang, Chuanxin Liu, Cun Wang, Xue Sun, Changgang |
author_sort | Zhang, Tingting |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on prior endocrine therapy. METHODS: The titles/abstracts were searched from the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs alternative targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal HR+/HER2– ABC following progression on prior endocrine therapy. In addition, the primary measured outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value of each treatment was calculated to achieve the best ranking for each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 4,178 patients in the network meta-analysis, were included and analyzed. In terms of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was superior to other target agents plus fulvestrant (HR=0.62, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.40–0.96; HR=0.62, 95% CrI: 0.47–0.96; for pictilisib plus fulvestrant and buparlisib plus fulvestrant, respectively). Ribociclib plus fulvestrant has no difference in abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR =1.02, 95% CrI =0.72–1.45; HR =1.22, 95% CrI =0.84–1.78). In terms of objective response rate, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, dovitinib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference (odds ratio [OR] =2.84, 95% CrI =1.91– 4.31; OR =3.62, 95% CrI =1.21–12.48; OR =1.80, 95% CrI =1.25–2.60; and OR =2.52, 95% CrI =1.43– 4.72, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to the present study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant may be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2– postmenopausal women with ABC after disease progression following endocrine therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6248378 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62483782018-12-03 Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis Zhang, Tingting Feng, Fubin Zhao, Wenge Yao, Yan Tian, Jinhui Zhou, Chao Zang, Chuanxin Liu, Cun Wang, Xue Sun, Changgang Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on prior endocrine therapy. METHODS: The titles/abstracts were searched from the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs alternative targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal HR+/HER2– ABC following progression on prior endocrine therapy. In addition, the primary measured outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value of each treatment was calculated to achieve the best ranking for each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 4,178 patients in the network meta-analysis, were included and analyzed. In terms of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was superior to other target agents plus fulvestrant (HR=0.62, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.40–0.96; HR=0.62, 95% CrI: 0.47–0.96; for pictilisib plus fulvestrant and buparlisib plus fulvestrant, respectively). Ribociclib plus fulvestrant has no difference in abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR =1.02, 95% CrI =0.72–1.45; HR =1.22, 95% CrI =0.84–1.78). In terms of objective response rate, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, dovitinib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference (odds ratio [OR] =2.84, 95% CrI =1.91– 4.31; OR =3.62, 95% CrI =1.21–12.48; OR =1.80, 95% CrI =1.25–2.60; and OR =2.52, 95% CrI =1.43– 4.72, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to the present study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant may be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2– postmenopausal women with ABC after disease progression following endocrine therapy. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6248378/ /pubmed/30510455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172 Text en © 2018 Zhang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zhang, Tingting Feng, Fubin Zhao, Wenge Yao, Yan Tian, Jinhui Zhou, Chao Zang, Chuanxin Liu, Cun Wang, Xue Sun, Changgang Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title | Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title_full | Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title_short | Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
title_sort | comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248378/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangtingting comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT fengfubin comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT zhaowenge comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT yaoyan comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT tianjinhui comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT zhouchao comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT zangchuanxin comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT liucun comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT wangxue comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis AT sunchanggang comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis |