Cargando…

Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Tingting, Feng, Fubin, Zhao, Wenge, Yao, Yan, Tian, Jinhui, Zhou, Chao, Zang, Chuanxin, Liu, Cun, Wang, Xue, Sun, Changgang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510455
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172
_version_ 1783372622547910656
author Zhang, Tingting
Feng, Fubin
Zhao, Wenge
Yao, Yan
Tian, Jinhui
Zhou, Chao
Zang, Chuanxin
Liu, Cun
Wang, Xue
Sun, Changgang
author_facet Zhang, Tingting
Feng, Fubin
Zhao, Wenge
Yao, Yan
Tian, Jinhui
Zhou, Chao
Zang, Chuanxin
Liu, Cun
Wang, Xue
Sun, Changgang
author_sort Zhang, Tingting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on prior endocrine therapy. METHODS: The titles/abstracts were searched from the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs alternative targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal HR+/HER2– ABC following progression on prior endocrine therapy. In addition, the primary measured outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value of each treatment was calculated to achieve the best ranking for each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 4,178 patients in the network meta-analysis, were included and analyzed. In terms of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was superior to other target agents plus fulvestrant (HR=0.62, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.40–0.96; HR=0.62, 95% CrI: 0.47–0.96; for pictilisib plus fulvestrant and buparlisib plus fulvestrant, respectively). Ribociclib plus fulvestrant has no difference in abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR =1.02, 95% CrI =0.72–1.45; HR =1.22, 95% CrI =0.84–1.78). In terms of objective response rate, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, dovitinib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference (odds ratio [OR] =2.84, 95% CrI =1.91– 4.31; OR =3.62, 95% CrI =1.21–12.48; OR =1.80, 95% CrI =1.25–2.60; and OR =2.52, 95% CrI =1.43– 4.72, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to the present study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant may be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2– postmenopausal women with ABC after disease progression following endocrine therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6248378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62483782018-12-03 Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis Zhang, Tingting Feng, Fubin Zhao, Wenge Yao, Yan Tian, Jinhui Zhou, Chao Zang, Chuanxin Liu, Cun Wang, Xue Sun, Changgang Cancer Manag Res Original Research BACKGROUND: We performed a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to indirectly compare the efficacy of different targeted agents with fulvestrant for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) following progression on prior endocrine therapy. METHODS: The titles/abstracts were searched from the PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy of palbociclib plus fulvestrant vs alternative targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal HR+/HER2– ABC following progression on prior endocrine therapy. In addition, the primary measured outcome was progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate. The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) value of each treatment was calculated to achieve the best ranking for each treatment. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies, including 4,178 patients in the network meta-analysis, were included and analyzed. In terms of the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS, palbociclib plus fulvestrant was superior to other target agents plus fulvestrant (HR=0.62, 95% credible interval [CrI]: 0.40–0.96; HR=0.62, 95% CrI: 0.47–0.96; for pictilisib plus fulvestrant and buparlisib plus fulvestrant, respectively). Ribociclib plus fulvestrant has no difference in abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and palbociclib plus fulvestrant (HR =1.02, 95% CrI =0.72–1.45; HR =1.22, 95% CrI =0.84–1.78). In terms of objective response rate, compared with placebo plus fulvestrant, abemaciclib plus fulvestrant, dovitinib plus fulvestrant, buparlisib plus fulvestrant, and palbociclib plus fulvestrant had a significant difference (odds ratio [OR] =2.84, 95% CrI =1.91– 4.31; OR =3.62, 95% CrI =1.21–12.48; OR =1.80, 95% CrI =1.25–2.60; and OR =2.52, 95% CrI =1.43– 4.72, respectively). CONCLUSION: According to the present study, palbociclib plus fulvestrant may be the optimal treatment for HR+/HER2– postmenopausal women with ABC after disease progression following endocrine therapy. Dove Medical Press 2018-11-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6248378/ /pubmed/30510455 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172 Text en © 2018 Zhang et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zhang, Tingting
Feng, Fubin
Zhao, Wenge
Yao, Yan
Tian, Jinhui
Zhou, Chao
Zang, Chuanxin
Liu, Cun
Wang, Xue
Sun, Changgang
Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title_full Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title_short Comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
title_sort comparative efficacy of different targeted therapies plus fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer following progression on prior endocrine therapy: a network meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6248378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30510455
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S176172
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangtingting comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT fengfubin comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaowenge comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT yaoyan comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT tianjinhui comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhouchao comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT zangchuanxin comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT liucun comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wangxue comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis
AT sunchanggang comparativeefficacyofdifferenttargetedtherapiesplusfulvestrantforadvancedbreastcancerfollowingprogressiononpriorendocrinetherapyanetworkmetaanalysis