Cargando…

Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography

External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A., Dimmock, Matthew R., Albrecht, David W., Paganin, David M., Bassed, Richard B., Klein, Mitzi, Harris, Peter C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Milan 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x
_version_ 1783372681906749440
author Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A.
Dimmock, Matthew R.
Albrecht, David W.
Paganin, David M.
Bassed, Richard B.
Klein, Mitzi
Harris, Peter C.
author_facet Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A.
Dimmock, Matthew R.
Albrecht, David W.
Paganin, David M.
Bassed, Richard B.
Klein, Mitzi
Harris, Peter C.
author_sort Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A.
collection PubMed
description External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality is plain film radiology, computed tomography (CT) may be performed in order for the surgeon to make a more confident clinical decision (e.g. timing of frame removal, assessment of degree of arthrodesis). We used a fractured sheep leg to systematically assess CT imaging performance with a Discovery CT750 HD CT scanner (GE Healthcare) to show how rod coupling in both traditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames distorts images. We also investigated the role of dual-energy CT (DECT) and metal artefact reduction software (MARS) on the visualisation of the fractured leg. Whilst mechanical reasons predominantly dictate the rod/strut configurations when building a circular frame, rod coupling in CT can be minimised. Firstly, ideally, all or all but one rod can be removed during imaging resulting in no rod coupling. If this is not possible, strategies for configuring the rods to minimise the effect of the rod coupling on the region of interest are demonstrated, e.g., in the case of a four-rod construct, switching the two anterior rods to a more central single one will achieve this goal without particularly jeopardising mechanical strength for a short period. It is also shown that the addition of DECT and MARS results in a reduction of artefacts, but also affects tissue and bone differentiation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249148
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Milan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62491482018-12-06 Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. Dimmock, Matthew R. Albrecht, David W. Paganin, David M. Bassed, Richard B. Klein, Mitzi Harris, Peter C. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality is plain film radiology, computed tomography (CT) may be performed in order for the surgeon to make a more confident clinical decision (e.g. timing of frame removal, assessment of degree of arthrodesis). We used a fractured sheep leg to systematically assess CT imaging performance with a Discovery CT750 HD CT scanner (GE Healthcare) to show how rod coupling in both traditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames distorts images. We also investigated the role of dual-energy CT (DECT) and metal artefact reduction software (MARS) on the visualisation of the fractured leg. Whilst mechanical reasons predominantly dictate the rod/strut configurations when building a circular frame, rod coupling in CT can be minimised. Firstly, ideally, all or all but one rod can be removed during imaging resulting in no rod coupling. If this is not possible, strategies for configuring the rods to minimise the effect of the rod coupling on the region of interest are demonstrated, e.g., in the case of a four-rod construct, switching the two anterior rods to a more central single one will achieve this goal without particularly jeopardising mechanical strength for a short period. It is also shown that the addition of DECT and MARS results in a reduction of artefacts, but also affects tissue and bone differentiation. Springer Milan 2018-09-15 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6249148/ /pubmed/30220005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A.
Dimmock, Matthew R.
Albrecht, David W.
Paganin, David M.
Bassed, Richard B.
Klein, Mitzi
Harris, Peter C.
Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title_full Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title_fullStr Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title_short Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
title_sort effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249148/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x
work_keys_str_mv AT penasolorzanocarlosa effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT dimmockmatthewr effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT albrechtdavidw effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT paganindavidm effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT bassedrichardb effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT kleinmitzi effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography
AT harrispeterc effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography