Cargando…
Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography
External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Milan
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x |
_version_ | 1783372681906749440 |
---|---|
author | Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. Dimmock, Matthew R. Albrecht, David W. Paganin, David M. Bassed, Richard B. Klein, Mitzi Harris, Peter C. |
author_facet | Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. Dimmock, Matthew R. Albrecht, David W. Paganin, David M. Bassed, Richard B. Klein, Mitzi Harris, Peter C. |
author_sort | Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality is plain film radiology, computed tomography (CT) may be performed in order for the surgeon to make a more confident clinical decision (e.g. timing of frame removal, assessment of degree of arthrodesis). We used a fractured sheep leg to systematically assess CT imaging performance with a Discovery CT750 HD CT scanner (GE Healthcare) to show how rod coupling in both traditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames distorts images. We also investigated the role of dual-energy CT (DECT) and metal artefact reduction software (MARS) on the visualisation of the fractured leg. Whilst mechanical reasons predominantly dictate the rod/strut configurations when building a circular frame, rod coupling in CT can be minimised. Firstly, ideally, all or all but one rod can be removed during imaging resulting in no rod coupling. If this is not possible, strategies for configuring the rods to minimise the effect of the rod coupling on the region of interest are demonstrated, e.g., in the case of a four-rod construct, switching the two anterior rods to a more central single one will achieve this goal without particularly jeopardising mechanical strength for a short period. It is also shown that the addition of DECT and MARS results in a reduction of artefacts, but also affects tissue and bone differentiation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6249148 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Milan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62491482018-12-06 Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. Dimmock, Matthew R. Albrecht, David W. Paganin, David M. Bassed, Richard B. Klein, Mitzi Harris, Peter C. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr Original Article External fixation is a common tool in the treatment of complex fractures, correction of limb deformity, and salvage arthrodesis. These devices typically incorporate radio-opaque metal rods/struts connected at varying distances and orientations between rings. Whilst the predominant imaging modality is plain film radiology, computed tomography (CT) may be performed in order for the surgeon to make a more confident clinical decision (e.g. timing of frame removal, assessment of degree of arthrodesis). We used a fractured sheep leg to systematically assess CT imaging performance with a Discovery CT750 HD CT scanner (GE Healthcare) to show how rod coupling in both traditional Ilizarov and hexapod frames distorts images. We also investigated the role of dual-energy CT (DECT) and metal artefact reduction software (MARS) on the visualisation of the fractured leg. Whilst mechanical reasons predominantly dictate the rod/strut configurations when building a circular frame, rod coupling in CT can be minimised. Firstly, ideally, all or all but one rod can be removed during imaging resulting in no rod coupling. If this is not possible, strategies for configuring the rods to minimise the effect of the rod coupling on the region of interest are demonstrated, e.g., in the case of a four-rod construct, switching the two anterior rods to a more central single one will achieve this goal without particularly jeopardising mechanical strength for a short period. It is also shown that the addition of DECT and MARS results in a reduction of artefacts, but also affects tissue and bone differentiation. Springer Milan 2018-09-15 2018-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6249148/ /pubmed/30220005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Peña-Solórzano, Carlos A. Dimmock, Matthew R. Albrecht, David W. Paganin, David M. Bassed, Richard B. Klein, Mitzi Harris, Peter C. Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title | Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title_full | Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title_fullStr | Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title_short | Effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
title_sort | effect of external fixation rod coupling in computed tomography |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249148/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30220005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11751-018-0318-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penasolorzanocarlosa effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT dimmockmatthewr effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT albrechtdavidw effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT paganindavidm effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT bassedrichardb effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT kleinmitzi effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography AT harrispeterc effectofexternalfixationrodcouplingincomputedtomography |