Cargando…

Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND: Variation exists in the resource categories included in economic evaluations, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance suggests the inclusion only of costs related to the index condition or intervention. However, there is a growing consensus that all healthca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lomas, James, Asaria, Miqdad, Bojke, Laura, Gale, Chris P., Richardson, Gerry, Walker, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0068-1
_version_ 1783372691585105920
author Lomas, James
Asaria, Miqdad
Bojke, Laura
Gale, Chris P.
Richardson, Gerry
Walker, Simon
author_facet Lomas, James
Asaria, Miqdad
Bojke, Laura
Gale, Chris P.
Richardson, Gerry
Walker, Simon
author_sort Lomas, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Variation exists in the resource categories included in economic evaluations, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance suggests the inclusion only of costs related to the index condition or intervention. However, there is a growing consensus that all healthcare costs should be included in economic evaluations for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs), particularly those related to extended years of life. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: We aimed to quantify the impact of a range of cost categories on the adoption decision about a hypothetical intervention, and uncertainty around that decision, for stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) based on a dataset comprising 94,966 patients. Three costing scenarios were considered: coronary heart disease (CHD) costs only, cardiovascular disease (CVD) costs and all costs. The first two illustrate different interpretations of what might be regarded as related costs. RESULTS: Employing a 20-year time horizon, the highest mean expected incremental cost was when all costs were included (£2468) and the lowest when CVD costs only were included (£2377). The probability of the treatment being cost effective, estimating health opportunity costs using a ratio of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), was different for each of the CHD (70%) costs, CVD costs (73%) and all costs (56%) scenarios. The results concern a hypothetical intervention and are illustrative only, as such they cannot necessarily be generalised to all interventions and diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Cost categories included in an economic evaluation of SCAD impact on estimates of both cost effectiveness and decision uncertainty. With an aging and co-morbid population, the inclusion of all healthcare costs may have important ramifications for the selection of healthcare provision on economic grounds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0068-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62491992018-12-06 Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease Lomas, James Asaria, Miqdad Bojke, Laura Gale, Chris P. Richardson, Gerry Walker, Simon Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Variation exists in the resource categories included in economic evaluations, and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance suggests the inclusion only of costs related to the index condition or intervention. However, there is a growing consensus that all healthcare costs should be included in economic evaluations for Health Technology Assessments (HTAs), particularly those related to extended years of life. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: We aimed to quantify the impact of a range of cost categories on the adoption decision about a hypothetical intervention, and uncertainty around that decision, for stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) based on a dataset comprising 94,966 patients. Three costing scenarios were considered: coronary heart disease (CHD) costs only, cardiovascular disease (CVD) costs and all costs. The first two illustrate different interpretations of what might be regarded as related costs. RESULTS: Employing a 20-year time horizon, the highest mean expected incremental cost was when all costs were included (£2468) and the lowest when CVD costs only were included (£2377). The probability of the treatment being cost effective, estimating health opportunity costs using a ratio of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), was different for each of the CHD (70%) costs, CVD costs (73%) and all costs (56%) scenarios. The results concern a hypothetical intervention and are illustrative only, as such they cannot necessarily be generalised to all interventions and diseases. CONCLUSIONS: Cost categories included in an economic evaluation of SCAD impact on estimates of both cost effectiveness and decision uncertainty. With an aging and co-morbid population, the inclusion of all healthcare costs may have important ramifications for the selection of healthcare provision on economic grounds. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-018-0068-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2018-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6249199/ /pubmed/29446055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0068-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Lomas, James
Asaria, Miqdad
Bojke, Laura
Gale, Chris P.
Richardson, Gerry
Walker, Simon
Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Which Costs Matter? Costs Included in Economic Evaluation and their Impact on Decision Uncertainty for Stable Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort which costs matter? costs included in economic evaluation and their impact on decision uncertainty for stable coronary artery disease
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29446055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-018-0068-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lomasjames whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT asariamiqdad whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT bojkelaura whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT galechrisp whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT richardsongerry whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease
AT walkersimon whichcostsmattercostsincludedineconomicevaluationandtheirimpactondecisionuncertaintyforstablecoronaryarterydisease