Cargando…
US gynecologists’ estimates and beliefs regarding ovarian cancer screening’s effectiveness 5 years after release of the PLCO evidence
Efficient patient care requires the conscientious use of current best evidence. Such evidence on ovarian cancer screening showed that the screening has no survival benefit but considerable harms; currently no medical organization recommends it. In a cross-sectional online survey study with 401 US ou...
Autores principales: | Wegwarth, Odette, Gigerenzer, Gerd |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35585-z |
Ejemplares similares
-
Can facts trump unconditional trust? Evidence-based information halves the influence of physicians’ non-evidence-based cancer screening recommendations
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
When evidence says no: gynaecologists’ reasons for (not) recommending ineffective ovarian cancer screening
por: Wegwarth, Odette, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
A Simple Tool for Communicating the Benefits and Harms of Health
Interventions: A Guide for Creating a Fact Box
por: McDowell, Michelle, et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Opinions and Practice of US-Based Obstetrician-Gynecologists regarding Vitamin D Screening and Supplementation of Pregnant Women
por: Mohamed, Sara A., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Ovarian Cancer Screening Practices of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in Puerto Rico
por: Rodríguez-Ayala, Gianni, et al.
Publicado: (2014)