Cargando…
Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis
Waste water treatment facilities are a major sources of organic micropollutants (MPs) in surface water. In this study, surface water samples were collected from seven sites along a river system in Uppsala, Sweden, during four seasons and evaluated based on the occurrence of MPs in the samples and bi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35533-x |
_version_ | 1783372714444062720 |
---|---|
author | Rosenmai, Anna Kjerstine Lundqvist, Johan Gago-Ferrero, Pablo Mandava, Geeta Ahrens, Lutz Wiberg, Karin Oskarsson, Agneta |
author_facet | Rosenmai, Anna Kjerstine Lundqvist, Johan Gago-Ferrero, Pablo Mandava, Geeta Ahrens, Lutz Wiberg, Karin Oskarsson, Agneta |
author_sort | Rosenmai, Anna Kjerstine |
collection | PubMed |
description | Waste water treatment facilities are a major sources of organic micropollutants (MPs) in surface water. In this study, surface water samples were collected from seven sites along a river system in Uppsala, Sweden, during four seasons and evaluated based on the occurrence of MPs in the samples and bioactivity using in vitro bioassays. The sampling sites were differentially impacted by on-site sewage treatment facilities (OSSFs), small scale, and large scale waste water treatment plants (WWTPs). The bioassays used included activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), estrogen receptor (ER), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFkB), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), and androgen receptor (AR). Occurrence of 80 MPs, were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Most water samples induced AhR activity, and all sampling sites showed a similar profile regarding this activity. With the exception of one water sample, we did not detect any NFkB, Nrf2 or AR activity of the water samples. The exception was a sample impacted by OSSFs, which showed an activity in multiple bioassays, but the activity could not be explained by the occurrence of target MPs. The occurrence of MPs showed a spatial trend, with the highest number and amount of MPs detected in the samples collected downstream of the WWTPs, where up to 47 MPs were detected in one single sample. A seasonal variation was observed with highest levels of MPs and highest AhR activities in samples collected in June and September 2015. However, neither the seasonal activity nor the on-site activity could be explained by the measured MPs, suggesting unknown contributory agents in the water. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6249289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62492892018-11-28 Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis Rosenmai, Anna Kjerstine Lundqvist, Johan Gago-Ferrero, Pablo Mandava, Geeta Ahrens, Lutz Wiberg, Karin Oskarsson, Agneta Sci Rep Article Waste water treatment facilities are a major sources of organic micropollutants (MPs) in surface water. In this study, surface water samples were collected from seven sites along a river system in Uppsala, Sweden, during four seasons and evaluated based on the occurrence of MPs in the samples and bioactivity using in vitro bioassays. The sampling sites were differentially impacted by on-site sewage treatment facilities (OSSFs), small scale, and large scale waste water treatment plants (WWTPs). The bioassays used included activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), estrogen receptor (ER), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFkB), nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), and androgen receptor (AR). Occurrence of 80 MPs, were analyzed using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Most water samples induced AhR activity, and all sampling sites showed a similar profile regarding this activity. With the exception of one water sample, we did not detect any NFkB, Nrf2 or AR activity of the water samples. The exception was a sample impacted by OSSFs, which showed an activity in multiple bioassays, but the activity could not be explained by the occurrence of target MPs. The occurrence of MPs showed a spatial trend, with the highest number and amount of MPs detected in the samples collected downstream of the WWTPs, where up to 47 MPs were detected in one single sample. A seasonal variation was observed with highest levels of MPs and highest AhR activities in samples collected in June and September 2015. However, neither the seasonal activity nor the on-site activity could be explained by the measured MPs, suggesting unknown contributory agents in the water. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6249289/ /pubmed/30464315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35533-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Rosenmai, Anna Kjerstine Lundqvist, Johan Gago-Ferrero, Pablo Mandava, Geeta Ahrens, Lutz Wiberg, Karin Oskarsson, Agneta Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title | Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title_full | Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title_short | Effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
title_sort | effect-based assessment of recipient waters impacted by on-site, small scale, and large scale waste water treatment facilities – combining passive sampling with in vitro bioassays and chemical analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30464315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35533-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenmaiannakjerstine effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT lundqvistjohan effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT gagoferreropablo effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT mandavageeta effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT ahrenslutz effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT wibergkarin effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis AT oskarssonagneta effectbasedassessmentofrecipientwatersimpactedbyonsitesmallscaleandlargescalewastewatertreatmentfacilitiescombiningpassivesamplingwithinvitrobioassaysandchemicalanalysis |