Cargando…
Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes
BACKGROUND: Lacrosse is a rapidly growing sport in the United States. Comparing the magnitude and frequency of head impact mechanisms between sexes will provide data for injury prevention techniques and risk reduction of head injuries. PURPOSE: To compare sex-specific differences in the magnitude an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118807678 |
_version_ | 1783372790302244864 |
---|---|
author | Le, Rachel K. Saunders, Tabitha D. Breedlove, Katherine M. Bradney, Debbie A. Lucas, Jill M. Bowman, Thomas G. |
author_facet | Le, Rachel K. Saunders, Tabitha D. Breedlove, Katherine M. Bradney, Debbie A. Lucas, Jill M. Bowman, Thomas G. |
author_sort | Le, Rachel K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Lacrosse is a rapidly growing sport in the United States. Comparing the magnitude and frequency of head impact mechanisms between sexes will provide data for injury prevention techniques and risk reduction of head injuries. PURPOSE: To compare sex-specific differences in the magnitude and frequency of head impact mechanisms in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III intercollegiate lacrosse athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 31 NCAA Division III intercollegiate lacrosse athletes (16 men [mean age, 21 ± 1 years; mean height, 179.70 ± 5.82 cm; mean weight, 80.71 ± 6.33 kg] and 15 women [mean age, 20 ± 1 years; mean height, 165.43 ± 5.25 cm; mean weight, 64.08 ± 7.59 kg]) voluntarily participated in this study. Participants wore xPatch sensors at every event during the 2015 spring season. Sensors recorded the magnitude, frequency, and location of head impacts over 10g. Linear (g) and rotational (deg/s(2)) acceleration determined impact magnitudes. We calculated incidence rates (IRs; per 1000 athlete-exposures [AEs]) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs to determine frequency differences. Film footage from each event was synchronized with the time of each head impact for verification and mechanism coding. Sex and impact mechanism served as the independent variables. RESULTS: A significant interaction was found between impact mechanism and sex (P < .001) and main effects for impact mechanism (P < .001) and sex (P < .001). The most common mechanism in men’s lacrosse was head to body (IR, 970.55/1000 AEs [95% CI, 266.14-331.98]), and in women’s lacrosse, stick to head (IR, 289.87/1000 AEs [95% CI, 124.32-184.55]) was most common. Only 9 of 419 impermissible head impacts in men’s lacrosse games were classed as penalties (2%); 7 of 25 impermissible head impacts in women’s lacrosse games were called as penalties (28%). CONCLUSION: The impact mechanisms of head to body in men’s lacrosse and stick to head in women’s lacrosse are penalties but occur frequently, suggesting that a focus on stressing rule enforcement is warranted. Because mechanism and sex affect the magnitude of head impacts, proper offensive and defensive techniques against opponents should be encouraged to reduce head impacts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6249660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62496602018-11-26 Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes Le, Rachel K. Saunders, Tabitha D. Breedlove, Katherine M. Bradney, Debbie A. Lucas, Jill M. Bowman, Thomas G. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Lacrosse is a rapidly growing sport in the United States. Comparing the magnitude and frequency of head impact mechanisms between sexes will provide data for injury prevention techniques and risk reduction of head injuries. PURPOSE: To compare sex-specific differences in the magnitude and frequency of head impact mechanisms in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division III intercollegiate lacrosse athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 31 NCAA Division III intercollegiate lacrosse athletes (16 men [mean age, 21 ± 1 years; mean height, 179.70 ± 5.82 cm; mean weight, 80.71 ± 6.33 kg] and 15 women [mean age, 20 ± 1 years; mean height, 165.43 ± 5.25 cm; mean weight, 64.08 ± 7.59 kg]) voluntarily participated in this study. Participants wore xPatch sensors at every event during the 2015 spring season. Sensors recorded the magnitude, frequency, and location of head impacts over 10g. Linear (g) and rotational (deg/s(2)) acceleration determined impact magnitudes. We calculated incidence rates (IRs; per 1000 athlete-exposures [AEs]) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs to determine frequency differences. Film footage from each event was synchronized with the time of each head impact for verification and mechanism coding. Sex and impact mechanism served as the independent variables. RESULTS: A significant interaction was found between impact mechanism and sex (P < .001) and main effects for impact mechanism (P < .001) and sex (P < .001). The most common mechanism in men’s lacrosse was head to body (IR, 970.55/1000 AEs [95% CI, 266.14-331.98]), and in women’s lacrosse, stick to head (IR, 289.87/1000 AEs [95% CI, 124.32-184.55]) was most common. Only 9 of 419 impermissible head impacts in men’s lacrosse games were classed as penalties (2%); 7 of 25 impermissible head impacts in women’s lacrosse games were called as penalties (28%). CONCLUSION: The impact mechanisms of head to body in men’s lacrosse and stick to head in women’s lacrosse are penalties but occur frequently, suggesting that a focus on stressing rule enforcement is warranted. Because mechanism and sex affect the magnitude of head impacts, proper offensive and defensive techniques against opponents should be encouraged to reduce head impacts. SAGE Publications 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6249660/ /pubmed/30480018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118807678 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Le, Rachel K. Saunders, Tabitha D. Breedlove, Katherine M. Bradney, Debbie A. Lucas, Jill M. Bowman, Thomas G. Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title | Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title_full | Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title_fullStr | Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title_short | Differences in the Mechanism of Head Impacts Measured Between Men’s and Women’s Intercollegiate Lacrosse Athletes |
title_sort | differences in the mechanism of head impacts measured between men’s and women’s intercollegiate lacrosse athletes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30480018 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967118807678 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lerachelk differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes AT saunderstabithad differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes AT breedlovekatherinem differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes AT bradneydebbiea differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes AT lucasjillm differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes AT bowmanthomasg differencesinthemechanismofheadimpactsmeasuredbetweenmensandwomensintercollegiatelacrosseathletes |