Cargando…

A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states

A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krishna, Sandeep, Laxman, Sunil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The American Society for Cell Biology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017
_version_ 1783372824447025152
author Krishna, Sandeep
Laxman, Sunil
author_facet Krishna, Sandeep
Laxman, Sunil
author_sort Krishna, Sandeep
collection PubMed
description A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth states. We consider metabolic resource availability, growth rates, and switching rates (between states) to model a relaxation oscillator explaining transitions between these states. This frustrated bistability model reveals a required communication between the metabolic resource that determines oscillations and the quiescent and growth state cells. Cells in each state reflect memory, or hysteresis of their current state, and “push–pull” cells from the other state. Finally, a parsimonious argument is made for a specific central metabolite as the controller of switching between quiescence and growth states. We discuss how an oscillator built around the availability of such a metabolic resource is sufficient to generally regulate oscillations between growth and quiescence through committed transitions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62498122018-11-30 A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states Krishna, Sandeep Laxman, Sunil Mol Biol Cell Articles A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth states. We consider metabolic resource availability, growth rates, and switching rates (between states) to model a relaxation oscillator explaining transitions between these states. This frustrated bistability model reveals a required communication between the metabolic resource that determines oscillations and the quiescent and growth state cells. Cells in each state reflect memory, or hysteresis of their current state, and “push–pull” cells from the other state. Finally, a parsimonious argument is made for a specific central metabolite as the controller of switching between quiescence and growth states. We discuss how an oscillator built around the availability of such a metabolic resource is sufficient to generally regulate oscillations between growth and quiescence through committed transitions. The American Society for Cell Biology 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6249812/ /pubmed/30044724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017 Text en © 2018 Krishna and Laxman. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Articles
Krishna, Sandeep
Laxman, Sunil
A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title_full A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title_fullStr A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title_full_unstemmed A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title_short A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
title_sort minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044724
http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017
work_keys_str_mv AT krishnasandeep aminimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates
AT laxmansunil aminimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates
AT krishnasandeep minimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates
AT laxmansunil minimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates