Cargando…
A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states
A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth st...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The American Society for Cell Biology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017 |
_version_ | 1783372824447025152 |
---|---|
author | Krishna, Sandeep Laxman, Sunil |
author_facet | Krishna, Sandeep Laxman, Sunil |
author_sort | Krishna, Sandeep |
collection | PubMed |
description | A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth states. We consider metabolic resource availability, growth rates, and switching rates (between states) to model a relaxation oscillator explaining transitions between these states. This frustrated bistability model reveals a required communication between the metabolic resource that determines oscillations and the quiescent and growth state cells. Cells in each state reflect memory, or hysteresis of their current state, and “push–pull” cells from the other state. Finally, a parsimonious argument is made for a specific central metabolite as the controller of switching between quiescence and growth states. We discuss how an oscillator built around the availability of such a metabolic resource is sufficient to generally regulate oscillations between growth and quiescence through committed transitions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6249812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62498122018-11-30 A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states Krishna, Sandeep Laxman, Sunil Mol Biol Cell Articles A minimal model for oscillating between quiescent and growth/proliferation states, dependent on the availability of a central metabolic resource, is presented. From the yeast metabolic cycles, metabolic oscillations in oxygen consumption are represented as transitions between quiescent and growth states. We consider metabolic resource availability, growth rates, and switching rates (between states) to model a relaxation oscillator explaining transitions between these states. This frustrated bistability model reveals a required communication between the metabolic resource that determines oscillations and the quiescent and growth state cells. Cells in each state reflect memory, or hysteresis of their current state, and “push–pull” cells from the other state. Finally, a parsimonious argument is made for a specific central metabolite as the controller of switching between quiescence and growth states. We discuss how an oscillator built around the availability of such a metabolic resource is sufficient to generally regulate oscillations between growth and quiescence through committed transitions. The American Society for Cell Biology 2018-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6249812/ /pubmed/30044724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017 Text en © 2018 Krishna and Laxman. “ASCB®,” “The American Society for Cell Biology®,” and “Molecular Biology of the Cell®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). Two months after publication it is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Articles Krishna, Sandeep Laxman, Sunil A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title | A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title_full | A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title_fullStr | A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title_full_unstemmed | A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title_short | A minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
title_sort | minimal “push–pull” bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30044724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E18-01-0017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krishnasandeep aminimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates AT laxmansunil aminimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates AT krishnasandeep minimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates AT laxmansunil minimalpushpullbistabilitymodelexplainsoscillationsbetweenquiescentandproliferativecellstates |