Cargando…

Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study

BACKGROUND: Dentine hypersensitivity is especially frequent in patients with pronounced periodontal attachment loss. Aim of the treatment is an obstruction of the dentine tubules in order to inhibit liquid or osmotic motion, which is considered as trigger for pain sensations. Novel approaches aim fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stefanie, Manz Andrea, Thomas, Attin, Beatrice, Sener, Philipp, Sahrmann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0642-z
_version_ 1783372824670371840
author Stefanie, Manz Andrea
Thomas, Attin
Beatrice, Sener
Philipp, Sahrmann
author_facet Stefanie, Manz Andrea
Thomas, Attin
Beatrice, Sener
Philipp, Sahrmann
author_sort Stefanie, Manz Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dentine hypersensitivity is especially frequent in patients with pronounced periodontal attachment loss. Aim of the treatment is an obstruction of the dentine tubules in order to inhibit liquid or osmotic motion, which is considered as trigger for pain sensations. Novel approaches aim for obstruction by calcium phosphate compounds in order to rely on biocompatible compounds. It was the aim of the study to optically investigate the morphology and to assess the fluid permeability of treated dentine surfaces. METHODS: Dentine discs were pretreated in an ultrasonic bath with 17% EDTA to clean the lumina of the dentine tubules. Samples of group A remained untreated while Seal&Protect® as a conventional desensitizer was applied for group B and DentinoCer in group C. Discs were mounted into a pulp fluid simulator (PFS) with a methylene blue solution in order to create a flow pressure of 0.5 bar. Over 12 d, discs were exposed three times per day to 0.1 M nonsaturated lactic acid. At baseline and after 2, 8 and 12 d samples were removed from PFS and prepared for SEM analysis. Tubule obstruction was assessed quantitatively using Olley scores and by qualitative description of the surface. Absorption spectrometry was used to assess the concentration of leaked methylene blue outside the samples in order to estimate dentine permeability. RESULTS: Untreated discs showed clean lumina of all tubules at all time points and magnifications. From day 2 onwards dentine showed exposed collagene fibers due to acid exposition. Seal&Protect® initially showed homogenous dentine surface coverage that got a more granulomatous aspect in the course of treatment time. Few samples showed sporadic tubules with open lumen at day 8 and 12. Group C showed samples with a homogeneous, even surface. Narrow slits in the superficial layer are visible from day 4 on, but the dentine surface remained invisible and dentine tubules were closed till the end of the investigation period. CONCLUSION: Over 12 d of lactid acid exposure, samples showed complete coverage of the dentine tubules in the chosen in-vitro-model when treated with Seal&Protect® or DentinoCer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62498132018-11-26 Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study Stefanie, Manz Andrea Thomas, Attin Beatrice, Sener Philipp, Sahrmann BMC Oral Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Dentine hypersensitivity is especially frequent in patients with pronounced periodontal attachment loss. Aim of the treatment is an obstruction of the dentine tubules in order to inhibit liquid or osmotic motion, which is considered as trigger for pain sensations. Novel approaches aim for obstruction by calcium phosphate compounds in order to rely on biocompatible compounds. It was the aim of the study to optically investigate the morphology and to assess the fluid permeability of treated dentine surfaces. METHODS: Dentine discs were pretreated in an ultrasonic bath with 17% EDTA to clean the lumina of the dentine tubules. Samples of group A remained untreated while Seal&Protect® as a conventional desensitizer was applied for group B and DentinoCer in group C. Discs were mounted into a pulp fluid simulator (PFS) with a methylene blue solution in order to create a flow pressure of 0.5 bar. Over 12 d, discs were exposed three times per day to 0.1 M nonsaturated lactic acid. At baseline and after 2, 8 and 12 d samples were removed from PFS and prepared for SEM analysis. Tubule obstruction was assessed quantitatively using Olley scores and by qualitative description of the surface. Absorption spectrometry was used to assess the concentration of leaked methylene blue outside the samples in order to estimate dentine permeability. RESULTS: Untreated discs showed clean lumina of all tubules at all time points and magnifications. From day 2 onwards dentine showed exposed collagene fibers due to acid exposition. Seal&Protect® initially showed homogenous dentine surface coverage that got a more granulomatous aspect in the course of treatment time. Few samples showed sporadic tubules with open lumen at day 8 and 12. Group C showed samples with a homogeneous, even surface. Narrow slits in the superficial layer are visible from day 4 on, but the dentine surface remained invisible and dentine tubules were closed till the end of the investigation period. CONCLUSION: Over 12 d of lactid acid exposure, samples showed complete coverage of the dentine tubules in the chosen in-vitro-model when treated with Seal&Protect® or DentinoCer. BioMed Central 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6249813/ /pubmed/30463552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0642-z Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stefanie, Manz Andrea
Thomas, Attin
Beatrice, Sener
Philipp, Sahrmann
Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title_full Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title_fullStr Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title_short Performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
title_sort performance of a bioglass-based dentine desensitizer under lactid acid exposition: an in-vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0642-z
work_keys_str_mv AT stefaniemanzandrea performanceofabioglassbaseddentinedesensitizerunderlactidacidexpositionaninvitrostudy
AT thomasattin performanceofabioglassbaseddentinedesensitizerunderlactidacidexpositionaninvitrostudy
AT beatricesener performanceofabioglassbaseddentinedesensitizerunderlactidacidexpositionaninvitrostudy
AT philippsahrmann performanceofabioglassbaseddentinedesensitizerunderlactidacidexpositionaninvitrostudy