Cargando…

Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square

In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of disclosure in informed consent to medical treatment, rejecting the application of the doctor-focused Bolam standard in favour of one focused on what was significant to patients. In Grimstone v Epsom a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Austin, Louise V
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx053
_version_ 1783372846471315456
author Austin, Louise V
author_facet Austin, Louise V
author_sort Austin, Louise V
collection PubMed
description In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of disclosure in informed consent to medical treatment, rejecting the application of the doctor-focused Bolam standard in favour of one focused on what was significant to patients. In Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 3756 (QB), despite acknowledging a new standard now applied, McGowan J nevertheless used the Bolam test to determine liability for non-disclosure. This illustrates ongoing judicial deference to the medical profession and this case commentary explores that decision and its implications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62499042018-11-27 Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square Austin, Louise V Med Law Rev Commentaries In Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 the Supreme Court redefined the standard of disclosure in informed consent to medical treatment, rejecting the application of the doctor-focused Bolam standard in favour of one focused on what was significant to patients. In Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust [2015] EWHC 3756 (QB), despite acknowledging a new standard now applied, McGowan J nevertheless used the Bolam test to determine liability for non-disclosure. This illustrates ongoing judicial deference to the medical profession and this case commentary explores that decision and its implications. Oxford University Press 2018-11 2017-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC6249904/ /pubmed/29186527 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx053 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentaries
Austin, Louise V
Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title_full Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title_fullStr Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title_full_unstemmed Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title_short Grimstone v Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust: (It’s Not) Hip to Be Square
title_sort grimstone v epsom and st helier university hospitals nhs trust: (it’s not) hip to be square
topic Commentaries
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29186527
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx053
work_keys_str_mv AT austinlouisev grimstonevepsomandsthelieruniversityhospitalsnhstrustitsnothiptobesquare