Cargando…

Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have been highlighted as a method of active travel that could overcome some of the commonly reported barriers to cycle commuting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the health benefits associated with e-cycling. METHOD: A system...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bourne, Jessica E., Sauchelli, Sarah, Perry, Rachel, Page, Angie, Leary, Sam, England, Clare, Cooper, Ashley R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8
_version_ 1783372860092317696
author Bourne, Jessica E.
Sauchelli, Sarah
Perry, Rachel
Page, Angie
Leary, Sam
England, Clare
Cooper, Ashley R.
author_facet Bourne, Jessica E.
Sauchelli, Sarah
Perry, Rachel
Page, Angie
Leary, Sam
England, Clare
Cooper, Ashley R.
author_sort Bourne, Jessica E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have been highlighted as a method of active travel that could overcome some of the commonly reported barriers to cycle commuting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the health benefits associated with e-cycling. METHOD: A systematic literature review of studies examining physical activity, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and psychological outcomes associated with e-cycling. Where possible these outcomes were compared to those from conventional cycling and walking. Seven electronic databases, clinical trial registers, grey literature and reference lists were searched up to November 2017. Hand searching occurred until June 2018. Experimental or observational studies examining the impact of e-cycling on physical activity and/or health outcomes of interest were included. E-bikes used must have pedals and require pedalling for electric assistance to be provided. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (11 acute experiments, 6 longitudinal interventions) were identified involving a total of 300 participants. There was moderate evidence that e-cycling provided physical activity of at least moderate intensity, which was lower than the intensity elicited during conventional cycling, but higher than that during walking. There was also moderate evidence that e-cycling can improve cardiorespiratory fitness in physically inactive individuals. Evidence of the impact of e-cycling on metabolic and psychological health outcomes was inconclusive. Longitudinal evidence was compromised by weak study design and quality. CONCLUSION: E-cycling can contribute to meeting physical activity recommendations and increasing physical fitness. As such, e-bikes offer a potential alternative to conventional cycling. Future research should examine the long-term health impacts of e-cycling using rigorous research designs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249962
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62499622018-11-26 Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review Bourne, Jessica E. Sauchelli, Sarah Perry, Rachel Page, Angie Leary, Sam England, Clare Cooper, Ashley R. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Review BACKGROUND: Electrically assisted bicycles (e-bikes) have been highlighted as a method of active travel that could overcome some of the commonly reported barriers to cycle commuting. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the health benefits associated with e-cycling. METHOD: A systematic literature review of studies examining physical activity, cardiorespiratory, metabolic and psychological outcomes associated with e-cycling. Where possible these outcomes were compared to those from conventional cycling and walking. Seven electronic databases, clinical trial registers, grey literature and reference lists were searched up to November 2017. Hand searching occurred until June 2018. Experimental or observational studies examining the impact of e-cycling on physical activity and/or health outcomes of interest were included. E-bikes used must have pedals and require pedalling for electric assistance to be provided. RESULTS: Seventeen studies (11 acute experiments, 6 longitudinal interventions) were identified involving a total of 300 participants. There was moderate evidence that e-cycling provided physical activity of at least moderate intensity, which was lower than the intensity elicited during conventional cycling, but higher than that during walking. There was also moderate evidence that e-cycling can improve cardiorespiratory fitness in physically inactive individuals. Evidence of the impact of e-cycling on metabolic and psychological health outcomes was inconclusive. Longitudinal evidence was compromised by weak study design and quality. CONCLUSION: E-cycling can contribute to meeting physical activity recommendations and increasing physical fitness. As such, e-bikes offer a potential alternative to conventional cycling. Future research should examine the long-term health impacts of e-cycling using rigorous research designs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6249962/ /pubmed/30463581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Bourne, Jessica E.
Sauchelli, Sarah
Perry, Rachel
Page, Angie
Leary, Sam
England, Clare
Cooper, Ashley R.
Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title_full Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title_fullStr Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title_short Health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
title_sort health benefits of electrically-assisted cycling: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249962/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30463581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0751-8
work_keys_str_mv AT bournejessicae healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT sauchellisarah healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT perryrachel healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT pageangie healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT learysam healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT englandclare healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview
AT cooperashleyr healthbenefitsofelectricallyassistedcyclingasystematicreview