Cargando…

Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities

Background: Considering the thoracic, lumbar spine or whole spine as rigid segments has been the norm until recent studies highlighted the importance of more detailed modelling. A better understanding of the requirement for spine multi-segmental analysis could guide planning of future studies and av...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papi, Enrica, Bull, Anthony M.J., McGregor, Alison H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Sciencem 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30391750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.031
_version_ 1783372867570761728
author Papi, Enrica
Bull, Anthony M.J.
McGregor, Alison H.
author_facet Papi, Enrica
Bull, Anthony M.J.
McGregor, Alison H.
author_sort Papi, Enrica
collection PubMed
description Background: Considering the thoracic, lumbar spine or whole spine as rigid segments has been the norm until recent studies highlighted the importance of more detailed modelling. A better understanding of the requirement for spine multi-segmental analysis could guide planning of future studies and avoid missing clinically-relevant information. Research question: This study aims to assess the correlation between adjacent spine segments movement thereby evaluating segmental redundancy in both healthy and participants with low back pain (LBP). Methods: A 3D motion capture system tracked the movement of upper and lower thoracic and lumbar spine segments in twenty healthy and twenty participants with LBP. Tasks performed included walking, sit-to-stand and lifting, repeated 3 times. 3D angular kinematics were calculated for each spine segment. Segmental redundancy was evaluated through cross-correlation (R(xy)) analysis of kinematics time series and correlation of range of motion (R(ROM)) of adjacent spine segments. Results: The upper/lower lumbar pairing showed weak correlations in the LBP group for all tasks and anatomical planes (R(xy)range:0.02–0.36) but moderate and strong correlations during walking (R(xy) _frontalplane:0.4) and lifting (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.64) in the healthy group. The lower thoracic/upper lumbar pairing had weak correlations for both groups during lifting and sit-to-stand in the frontal plane and for walking (R(xy):0.01) in the sagittal plane only. The upper/lower thoracic pairing had moderate correlations during sit-to-stand in sagittal and transverse plane in patients with LBP (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.41; R(xy) _transverse plane:−0.42) but weak in healthy (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.23; R(xy) _transverseplane:−0.34); the contrary was observed during lifting. The majority of R(ROM) values (55/72) demonstrated weak correlations. Significance:The results suggest that multi-segmental analysis of the spine is necessary if spine movement characteristics are to be fully understood. We cannot establish a priori where redundancy occurs based on healthy data, therefore extra consideration should be made when planning studies with pathological cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6249993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier Sciencem
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62499932019-01-01 Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities Papi, Enrica Bull, Anthony M.J. McGregor, Alison H. Gait Posture Article Background: Considering the thoracic, lumbar spine or whole spine as rigid segments has been the norm until recent studies highlighted the importance of more detailed modelling. A better understanding of the requirement for spine multi-segmental analysis could guide planning of future studies and avoid missing clinically-relevant information. Research question: This study aims to assess the correlation between adjacent spine segments movement thereby evaluating segmental redundancy in both healthy and participants with low back pain (LBP). Methods: A 3D motion capture system tracked the movement of upper and lower thoracic and lumbar spine segments in twenty healthy and twenty participants with LBP. Tasks performed included walking, sit-to-stand and lifting, repeated 3 times. 3D angular kinematics were calculated for each spine segment. Segmental redundancy was evaluated through cross-correlation (R(xy)) analysis of kinematics time series and correlation of range of motion (R(ROM)) of adjacent spine segments. Results: The upper/lower lumbar pairing showed weak correlations in the LBP group for all tasks and anatomical planes (R(xy)range:0.02–0.36) but moderate and strong correlations during walking (R(xy) _frontalplane:0.4) and lifting (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.64) in the healthy group. The lower thoracic/upper lumbar pairing had weak correlations for both groups during lifting and sit-to-stand in the frontal plane and for walking (R(xy):0.01) in the sagittal plane only. The upper/lower thoracic pairing had moderate correlations during sit-to-stand in sagittal and transverse plane in patients with LBP (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.41; R(xy) _transverse plane:−0.42) but weak in healthy (R(xy) _sagittalplane:0.23; R(xy) _transverseplane:−0.34); the contrary was observed during lifting. The majority of R(ROM) values (55/72) demonstrated weak correlations. Significance:The results suggest that multi-segmental analysis of the spine is necessary if spine movement characteristics are to be fully understood. We cannot establish a priori where redundancy occurs based on healthy data, therefore extra consideration should be made when planning studies with pathological cohorts. Elsevier Sciencem 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6249993/ /pubmed/30391750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.031 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papi, Enrica
Bull, Anthony M.J.
McGregor, Alison H.
Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title_full Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title_fullStr Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title_full_unstemmed Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title_short Spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
title_sort spinal segments do not move together predictably during daily activities
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6249993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30391750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.10.031
work_keys_str_mv AT papienrica spinalsegmentsdonotmovetogetherpredictablyduringdailyactivities
AT bullanthonymj spinalsegmentsdonotmovetogetherpredictablyduringdailyactivities
AT mcgregoralisonh spinalsegmentsdonotmovetogetherpredictablyduringdailyactivities