Cargando…

Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of variable corneal thickness on Pentacam HR diagnostic indices in normal corneas. METHODS: Retrospective study was conducted at Al Watany Eye Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Consecutive 160 eyes of young myopic subjects without KC were evaluated using Pentacam HR (WaveLight...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib, Wahba, Sherine Shafik, Elkitkat, Rania Serag, Madkour, Nermine Said, Fikry, Ramy Riad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9328120
_version_ 1783372877242826752
author Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib
Wahba, Sherine Shafik
Elkitkat, Rania Serag
Madkour, Nermine Said
Fikry, Ramy Riad
author_facet Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib
Wahba, Sherine Shafik
Elkitkat, Rania Serag
Madkour, Nermine Said
Fikry, Ramy Riad
author_sort Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of variable corneal thickness on Pentacam HR diagnostic indices in normal corneas. METHODS: Retrospective study was conducted at Al Watany Eye Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Consecutive 160 eyes of young myopic subjects without KC were evaluated using Pentacam HR (WaveLight Allegro Oculyzer II, Erlangen, Germany). The elevation- and thickness-based indices were recorded. Enrolled corneas were categorized into three groups according to TCT quartiles; group 1 (39 eyes) included corneas with TCT <523 µm, group 2 (81 eyes) with TCT between 523 and 564 µm, while group 3 (40 eyes) enrolled TCT >564 µm. The possible effect of pachymetry on Pentacam HR indices was assessed using partial correlation tests. RESULTS: In normal corneas, back elevation from best fit sphere (BE from BFS) and that from best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE) were the elevation indices that showed statistically significant differences among groups (P=0.013 and 0.019, respectively). Regarding pachymetric indices, maximum pachymetry progression index (PPI max) showed statistical significance (P=0.001). Partial correlations, after excluding age and refractive error effects, showed that TCT was correlated with BE from BFS, BE from BFTE, and PPI max (P=0.001, 0.001,0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Some Pentacam HR indices varied with different corneal thickness in normal corneas. This necessitates inclusion of pachymetric subgroups in the normative database. The use of the more robust indices (average pachymetry progression index and front elevations) is recommended in relatively thin or thick corneas.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6250031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62500312018-12-09 Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib Wahba, Sherine Shafik Elkitkat, Rania Serag Madkour, Nermine Said Fikry, Ramy Riad J Ophthalmol Research Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of variable corneal thickness on Pentacam HR diagnostic indices in normal corneas. METHODS: Retrospective study was conducted at Al Watany Eye Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Consecutive 160 eyes of young myopic subjects without KC were evaluated using Pentacam HR (WaveLight Allegro Oculyzer II, Erlangen, Germany). The elevation- and thickness-based indices were recorded. Enrolled corneas were categorized into three groups according to TCT quartiles; group 1 (39 eyes) included corneas with TCT <523 µm, group 2 (81 eyes) with TCT between 523 and 564 µm, while group 3 (40 eyes) enrolled TCT >564 µm. The possible effect of pachymetry on Pentacam HR indices was assessed using partial correlation tests. RESULTS: In normal corneas, back elevation from best fit sphere (BE from BFS) and that from best fit toric ellipsoid (BFTE) were the elevation indices that showed statistically significant differences among groups (P=0.013 and 0.019, respectively). Regarding pachymetric indices, maximum pachymetry progression index (PPI max) showed statistical significance (P=0.001). Partial correlations, after excluding age and refractive error effects, showed that TCT was correlated with BE from BFS, BE from BFTE, and PPI max (P=0.001, 0.001,0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Some Pentacam HR indices varied with different corneal thickness in normal corneas. This necessitates inclusion of pachymetric subgroups in the normative database. The use of the more robust indices (average pachymetry progression index and front elevations) is recommended in relatively thin or thick corneas. Hindawi 2018-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6250031/ /pubmed/30533219 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9328120 Text en Copyright © 2018 Maged Maher Salib Roshdy et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roshdy, Maged Maher Salib
Wahba, Sherine Shafik
Elkitkat, Rania Serag
Madkour, Nermine Said
Fikry, Ramy Riad
Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title_full Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title_fullStr Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title_full_unstemmed Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title_short Pentacam HR Indices Variation in Normal Corneas with Different Corneal Thickness
title_sort pentacam hr indices variation in normal corneas with different corneal thickness
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30533219
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9328120
work_keys_str_mv AT roshdymagedmahersalib pentacamhrindicesvariationinnormalcorneaswithdifferentcornealthickness
AT wahbasherineshafik pentacamhrindicesvariationinnormalcorneaswithdifferentcornealthickness
AT elkitkatraniaserag pentacamhrindicesvariationinnormalcorneaswithdifferentcornealthickness
AT madkournerminesaid pentacamhrindicesvariationinnormalcorneaswithdifferentcornealthickness
AT fikryramyriad pentacamhrindicesvariationinnormalcorneaswithdifferentcornealthickness