Cargando…

Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution

BACKGROUND: Buccal fat pad excision is offered as a means of obtaining a more aesthetic midface. This procedure has been documented in the form of countless videos on Instagram and other social media platforms with no long-term patient follow-up. We performed a retrospective analysis of published da...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benjamin, Martin, Reish, Richard G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001970
_version_ 1783372914852102144
author Benjamin, Martin
Reish, Richard G.
author_facet Benjamin, Martin
Reish, Richard G.
author_sort Benjamin, Martin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Buccal fat pad excision is offered as a means of obtaining a more aesthetic midface. This procedure has been documented in the form of countless videos on Instagram and other social media platforms with no long-term patient follow-up. We performed a retrospective analysis of published data regarding buccal fat pad excision and sought to better elucidate pitfalls regarding this underreported procedure. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in October 2017 through the PUBMED database regarding the utility of buccal fat pad excision in the setting of aesthetic improvement of the midface. Reference articles were screened to obtain relevant studies. A total of 121 citations were identified in the search but after eliminating duplicate studies and abstracts and utilizing predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria only 11 articles were satisfactory. None of these articles demonstrated any long-term patient follow-up. RESULTS: Out of the 121 relevant citations identified, only 2 studies published describe a case series of > 5 patients regarding cheek or midface sculpturing with buccal fat pad excision for aesthetic purposes, the total sample size between these 2 studies was 53 patients. Neither of the studies had follow-up regarding patient satisfaction or related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal fat pad resection as an aesthetic improvement of the midface has been described, but follow-up regarding loss of subcutaneous fat with aging and late secondary deformities have not been published in the literature. Further research in long-term patient follow-up including patient satisfaction and the encouragement of reporting postoperative complications is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6250453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62504532018-12-10 Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution Benjamin, Martin Reish, Richard G. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Buccal fat pad excision is offered as a means of obtaining a more aesthetic midface. This procedure has been documented in the form of countless videos on Instagram and other social media platforms with no long-term patient follow-up. We performed a retrospective analysis of published data regarding buccal fat pad excision and sought to better elucidate pitfalls regarding this underreported procedure. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in October 2017 through the PUBMED database regarding the utility of buccal fat pad excision in the setting of aesthetic improvement of the midface. Reference articles were screened to obtain relevant studies. A total of 121 citations were identified in the search but after eliminating duplicate studies and abstracts and utilizing predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria only 11 articles were satisfactory. None of these articles demonstrated any long-term patient follow-up. RESULTS: Out of the 121 relevant citations identified, only 2 studies published describe a case series of > 5 patients regarding cheek or midface sculpturing with buccal fat pad excision for aesthetic purposes, the total sample size between these 2 studies was 53 patients. Neither of the studies had follow-up regarding patient satisfaction or related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal fat pad resection as an aesthetic improvement of the midface has been described, but follow-up regarding loss of subcutaneous fat with aging and late secondary deformities have not been published in the literature. Further research in long-term patient follow-up including patient satisfaction and the encouragement of reporting postoperative complications is warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health 2018-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC6250453/ /pubmed/30534506 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001970 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Benjamin, Martin
Reish, Richard G.
Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title_full Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title_fullStr Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title_full_unstemmed Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title_short Buccal Fat Pad Excision: Proceed with Caution
title_sort buccal fat pad excision: proceed with caution
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30534506
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001970
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminmartin buccalfatpadexcisionproceedwithcaution
AT reishrichardg buccalfatpadexcisionproceedwithcaution