Cargando…
Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial
BACKGROUND: We investigated the comparability of Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) vs. without MLD in the management of arm lymphoedema in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients randomised into either treatment including MLD (T+MLD) or treatment wi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0306-4 |
_version_ | 1783373029260132352 |
---|---|
author | Tambour, Mette Holt, Marianne Speyer, Anette Christensen, Robin Gram, Bibi |
author_facet | Tambour, Mette Holt, Marianne Speyer, Anette Christensen, Robin Gram, Bibi |
author_sort | Tambour, Mette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We investigated the comparability of Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) vs. without MLD in the management of arm lymphoedema in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients randomised into either treatment including MLD (T+MLD) or treatment without MLD (T−MLD) received treatment 2×weekly for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the volume reduction (%) of arm lymphoedema at 7-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were volume reduction after the end of treatment, circumference of the arm, patient experience of heaviness and tension, and health status. RESULTS: Despite difficulties enrolling the planned number of patients (160), 77 were randomised and 73 (38 in T+MLD, 35 in T−MLD) completed the trial. In both groups, the volume of lymphoedema decreased significantly, with no difference between groups (1.0% [95% CI, −4.3;2.3%]): the precision in the 95% confidence interval indicates that the efficacy was comparable; the mean (SE) changes at month 7 were −6.8%(1.2) and −5.7% (1.2) in the T+MLD and T−MLD, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to any of the secondary outcomes. The results were robust and the conclusion was not sensitive even to various alternative assumptions or analytic approaches to data analysis. CONCLUSION: Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction in breast cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6251025 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62510252019-10-24 Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial Tambour, Mette Holt, Marianne Speyer, Anette Christensen, Robin Gram, Bibi Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: We investigated the comparability of Complete Decongestive Therapy (CDT) including manual lymphatic drainage (MLD) vs. without MLD in the management of arm lymphoedema in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Patients randomised into either treatment including MLD (T+MLD) or treatment without MLD (T−MLD) received treatment 2×weekly for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the volume reduction (%) of arm lymphoedema at 7-month follow-up. The secondary outcomes were volume reduction after the end of treatment, circumference of the arm, patient experience of heaviness and tension, and health status. RESULTS: Despite difficulties enrolling the planned number of patients (160), 77 were randomised and 73 (38 in T+MLD, 35 in T−MLD) completed the trial. In both groups, the volume of lymphoedema decreased significantly, with no difference between groups (1.0% [95% CI, −4.3;2.3%]): the precision in the 95% confidence interval indicates that the efficacy was comparable; the mean (SE) changes at month 7 were −6.8%(1.2) and −5.7% (1.2) in the T+MLD and T−MLD, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences with respect to any of the secondary outcomes. The results were robust and the conclusion was not sensitive even to various alternative assumptions or analytic approaches to data analysis. CONCLUSION: Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction in breast cancer patients. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-10-24 2018-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6251025/ /pubmed/30353049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0306-4 Text en © Cancer Research UK 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) |
spellingShingle | Article Tambour, Mette Holt, Marianne Speyer, Anette Christensen, Robin Gram, Bibi Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title | Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title_full | Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title_fullStr | Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title_short | Manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to Complete Decongestive Therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
title_sort | manual lymphatic drainage adds no further volume reduction to complete decongestive therapy on breast cancer-related lymphoedema: a multicentre, randomised, single-blind trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251025/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30353049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0306-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tambourmette manuallymphaticdrainageaddsnofurthervolumereductiontocompletedecongestivetherapyonbreastcancerrelatedlymphoedemaamulticentrerandomisedsingleblindtrial AT holtmarianne manuallymphaticdrainageaddsnofurthervolumereductiontocompletedecongestivetherapyonbreastcancerrelatedlymphoedemaamulticentrerandomisedsingleblindtrial AT speyeranette manuallymphaticdrainageaddsnofurthervolumereductiontocompletedecongestivetherapyonbreastcancerrelatedlymphoedemaamulticentrerandomisedsingleblindtrial AT christensenrobin manuallymphaticdrainageaddsnofurthervolumereductiontocompletedecongestivetherapyonbreastcancerrelatedlymphoedemaamulticentrerandomisedsingleblindtrial AT grambibi manuallymphaticdrainageaddsnofurthervolumereductiontocompletedecongestivetherapyonbreastcancerrelatedlymphoedemaamulticentrerandomisedsingleblindtrial |