Cargando…

A mixed-methods exploration of cognitive dispositions to respond and clinical reasoning errors with multiple choice questions

BACKGROUND: Cognitive dispositions to respond (i.e., cognitive biases and heuristics) are well-established clinical reasoning phenomena. While thought by many to be error-prone, some scholars contest that these cognitive dispositions to respond are pragmatic solutions for reasoning through clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Surry, Luke T., Torre, Dario, Trowbridge, Robert L., Durning, Steven J.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Research Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30470223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1372-2

Ejemplares similares

Dual processing theory and expertsʼ reasoning: exploring thinking on national multiple-choice questions
por: Durning, Steven J., et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The Clinical Reasoning Mapping Exercise (CResME): a new tool for exploring clinical reasoning
por: Torre, Dario M., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

A portable mnemonic to facilitate checking for cognitive errors
por: Chew, Keng Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Management reasoning scripts: Qualitative exploration using simulated physician-patient encounters
por: Cook, David A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Exploring clinical reasoning in novices: a self-regulated learning microanalytic assessment approach
por: Artino, Anthony R, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Clinical Reasoning in the Primary Care Setting: Two Scenario-Based Simulations for Residents and Attendings
por: Battista, Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Characterizing the Role of the “Triagist”: Reasons for Triage Discordance and Impact on Disposition
por: Amick, Ashley, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Chinese medical students’ disposition for critical thinking: a mixed methods exploration
por: Huang, Lei, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Perception of the usability and implementation of a metacognitive mnemonic to check cognitive errors in clinical setting
por: Chew, Keng Sheng, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

To respond or not to respond, the recurring question in plant mechanosensitivity
por: Leblanc-Fournier, Nathalie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

A Question of Choice
por: Grabiner, Gene
Publicado: (2011)

Multiple Choice Questions
Publicado: (2017)

Multiple Choice Questions
Publicado: (2014)

Analysing the Applicability of ChatGPT, Bard, and Bing to Generate Reasoning-Based Multiple-Choice Questions in Medical Physiology
por: Agarwal, Mayank, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Exploring the Role of Meditation and Dispositional Mindfulness on Social Cognition Domains: A Controlled Study
por: Campos, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Can you repeat the question? Paradata as a lens to understand respondent experience answering cognitively demanding, sensitive questions
por: Bell, Suzanne O., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Psychometric characteristics of Clinical Reasoning Problems (CRPs) and its correlation with routine multiple choice question (MCQ) in Cardiology department
por: DERAKHSHANDEH, ZAHRA, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Multiple choice questions on energy
por: Tripathi, Arun K
Publicado: (2010)

The Multiple Choice Question in Medicine
Publicado: (1977)

Multiple Choice Questions for the MRCP
por: Fleming, P. R.
Publicado: (1990)

To Admit or Not to Admit to the Emergency Department: The Disposition Question at a Tertiary Teaching and Referral Hospital
por: Alahmary, Khalid, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The importance of theory and method: A brief reflection on an innovative program of research examining how situational factors influence physicians’ clinical reasoning
por: Battista, Alexis, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Effects of live and video simulation on clinical reasoning performance and reflection
por: Cleary, Timothy J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Use of an e‑portfolio mapping tool: connecting experiences, analysis and action by learners
por: Heeneman, Sylvia, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Life experiences leading to the choice of surgery—A qualitative study exploring reasons behind the choice of undergoing gender affirmative surgery
por: Bjørnson, Lene Kjelkenes, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Pre-clerkship clinical skills and clinical reasoning course performance: Explaining the variance in clerkship performance: Pre-clerkship predictors of clerkship variance
por: LaRochelle, Jeffrey S., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Context and clinical reasoning: Understanding the medical student perspective
por: McBee, Elexis, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The Ukraine question: how should the south respond?
por: Kaur, Ravinder
Publicado: (2022)

Questions and Quandaries: How to respond to reviewer comments
por: Kuper, Ayelet, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Use of traditional medicine for the treatment of diabetes in Eastern Uganda: a qualitative exploration of reasons for choice
por: Rutebemberwa, Elizeus, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Multiple choice questions in human physiology
Publicado: (1985)

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN IMAGING SCIENCES
Publicado: (1983)

MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS IN HUMAN PHYSIOLOGY
Publicado: (1978)

MULTIPLE CHOICE (OBJECTIVE) QUESTIONS IN PHARMACOLOGY
Publicado: (1977)

Create Better Multiple-Choice Questions
por: Shank, Patti
Publicado: (2010)

Examinations Using Multiple Choice Questions
por: Buxton, R. St. J.
Publicado: (1971)

Contextual factors and clinical reasoning: differences in diagnostic and therapeutic reasoning in board certified versus resident physicians
por: McBee, Elexis, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Clinical Reasoning Curricula in Health Professions Education: A Scoping Review
por: Elvén, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Examining Bloom’s Taxonomy in Multiple Choice Questions: Students’ Approach to Questions
por: Stringer, J. K., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Even a little sleepiness influences neural activation and clinical reasoning in novices
por: Cleland, Jennifer, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_041qdb1vslm58cfjql2nser7r5