Cargando…

Prognostic value of computed tomography score in patients after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) with some modifications could be used to predict neurological outcomes in patients after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Jeong-Am, Lee, Young Hwan, Chung, Chi Ryang, Cho, Yang Hyun, Sung, Kiick, Jeon, Kyeongman, Suh, Gee Young, Park, Taek Kyu, Lee, Joo Myung, Chae, Minjung Kathy, Hong, Jeong-Ho, Lee, Sei Hee, Kim, Hyoung Soo, Yang, Jeong Hoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30466477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-018-2101-2
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) with some modifications could be used to predict neurological outcomes in patients after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR). METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of adult unconscious patients who were evaluated by brain computed tomography (CT) within 48 hours after ECPR between May 2010 and December 2016. ASPECTS, bilateral ASPECTS (ASPECTS-b), and modified ASPECTS (mASPECTS) were assessed by ROC curves to predict neurological outcomes. The primary outcome was neurological status upon hospital discharge assessed with the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale. RESULTS: Among 58 unconscious patients, survival to discharge was identified in 25 (43.1%) patients. Of these 25 survivors, 19 (32.8%) had good neurological outcomes (CPC score of 1 or 2). Interrater reliability of CT scores was excellent. Intraclass correlation coefficients of ASPECTS, ASPECTS-b, and mASPECTS were 0.918 (95% CI, 0.865–0.950), 0.918 (95% CI, 0.866–0.951), and 0.915 (95% CI, 0.860–0.949), respectively. The predictive performance of mASPECTS for poor neurological outcome was better than that of ASPECTS or ASPECTS-b (C-statistic for mASPECTS vs. ASPECTS, 0.922 vs. 0.812, p = 0.004; mASPECTS vs. ASPECTS-b, 0.922 vs. 0.818, p = 0.003). A cutoff of 25 for poor neurological outcome had a sensitivity of 84.6% (95% CI, 69.5–94.1%) and a specificity of 89.5% (95% CI, 66.9–98.7%) in mASPECTS. CONCLUSIONS: mASPECTS might be useful for predicting neurological outcomes in patients after ECPR. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-018-2101-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.