Cargando…

Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic orthodontic brackets and zirconia crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty zirconia specimens were computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milled, sintere...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Jamal Y., Rayyan, Mohammad M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547019
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17
_version_ 1783373079329636352
author Amer, Jamal Y.
Rayyan, Mohammad M.
author_facet Amer, Jamal Y.
Rayyan, Mohammad M.
author_sort Amer, Jamal Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic orthodontic brackets and zirconia crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty zirconia specimens were computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milled, sintered, glazed, and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the surface treatment applied: C: no surface treatment (control), S: sandblasted with 50 μm Al(2)O(3), and D: Sof-Lex disc roughening. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: P: Clearfil Ceramic Primer + Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray) and R: RelyX U200 (3M/ESPE). Metallic orthodontic brackets were bonded to the labial surface of the specimens. All specimens underwent thermocycling. SBS test was applied using a universal test machine at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Subgroup SP showed the highest SBS (20.8 ± 4.8 MPa), followed by subgroups SR (16.7 ± 4.6 MPa), DP (12.3 ± 2.8 MPa), and DR (11.6 ± 3 MPa). However, all specimens in the control group underwent debonding during thermocycling. The different surface treatment groups showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05), whereas the resin cement subgroups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBS between glazed zirconia crowns and metallic brackets strongly depended on the surface treatment applied. Sandblasting achieved the highest SBS. Roughening with Sof-Lex disc proved to be a reliable surface treatment modality for glazed zirconia. Bonding to untreated glazed zirconia surfaces led to bond failure. Both resin cements yielded strong SBS results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6251233
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62512332018-12-13 Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns Amer, Jamal Y. Rayyan, Mohammad M. J Orthod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength (SBS) between metallic orthodontic brackets and zirconia crowns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty zirconia specimens were computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing milled, sintered, glazed, and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were divided into three groups according to the surface treatment applied: C: no surface treatment (control), S: sandblasted with 50 μm Al(2)O(3), and D: Sof-Lex disc roughening. Each group was further subdivided into two subgroups according to the resin cement used: P: Clearfil Ceramic Primer + Panavia F2.0 (Kuraray) and R: RelyX U200 (3M/ESPE). Metallic orthodontic brackets were bonded to the labial surface of the specimens. All specimens underwent thermocycling. SBS test was applied using a universal test machine at a cross head speed of 1 mm/min. Data were analyzed using Mann–Whitney test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Subgroup SP showed the highest SBS (20.8 ± 4.8 MPa), followed by subgroups SR (16.7 ± 4.6 MPa), DP (12.3 ± 2.8 MPa), and DR (11.6 ± 3 MPa). However, all specimens in the control group underwent debonding during thermocycling. The different surface treatment groups showed highly significant differences (P < 0.05), whereas the resin cement subgroups showed no significant differences (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: SBS between glazed zirconia crowns and metallic brackets strongly depended on the surface treatment applied. Sandblasting achieved the highest SBS. Roughening with Sof-Lex disc proved to be a reliable surface treatment modality for glazed zirconia. Bonding to untreated glazed zirconia surfaces led to bond failure. Both resin cements yielded strong SBS results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6251233/ /pubmed/30547019 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Orthodontic Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amer, Jamal Y.
Rayyan, Mohammad M.
Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title_full Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title_fullStr Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title_full_unstemmed Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title_short Effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
title_sort effect of different surface treatments and bonding modalities on the shear bond strength between metallic orthodontic brackets and glazed monolithic zirconia crowns
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251233/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30547019
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jos.JOS_154_17
work_keys_str_mv AT amerjamaly effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandbondingmodalitiesontheshearbondstrengthbetweenmetallicorthodonticbracketsandglazedmonolithiczirconiacrowns
AT rayyanmohammadm effectofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsandbondingmodalitiesontheshearbondstrengthbetweenmetallicorthodonticbracketsandglazedmonolithiczirconiacrowns