Cargando…

Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?

INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current imaging tool of choice in the investigation of patients with seizures. The advent of high-resolution MRI with a dedicated seizure protocol has significantly increased the chances of identifying a cause, resulting in a positive clinical im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ponnatapura, Janardhana, Vemanna, Suresh, Ballal, Sandeep, Singla, Avisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30546927
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_38_18
_version_ 1783373082836074496
author Ponnatapura, Janardhana
Vemanna, Suresh
Ballal, Sandeep
Singla, Avisha
author_facet Ponnatapura, Janardhana
Vemanna, Suresh
Ballal, Sandeep
Singla, Avisha
author_sort Ponnatapura, Janardhana
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current imaging tool of choice in the investigation of patients with seizures. The advent of high-resolution MRI with a dedicated seizure protocol has significantly increased the chances of identifying a cause, resulting in a positive clinical impact on the management of these patients. AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of standard MRI, identify whether there is an increase in the diagnostic yield with the addition of dedicated seizure protocol, and compare the diagnostic yields of MRI and electroencephalogram (EEG) individually and in combination. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 129 consecutive patients who presented with new-onset seizures over an 18-month period. The MRI scans performed on 1.5T were reviewed for their diagnostic yield and their association with abnormal electrical activity on EEG. Chi-square test of significance (P < 0.05) was used to test for the difference in proportion. The correlation between MRI brain and EEG was studied using McNemer test. RESULTS: MRI detected potentially epileptogenic lesions in 59 patients (47%). The frequency of epileptogenic lesions was highest in patients who had focal-onset seizures (81%). The most common lesion type was infection and inflammation (28%), with neurocysticercosis being the most common, followed by mesial temporal sclerosis, ischemia, and tumor. About 37% of epileptogenic lesions were missed by standard protocol, which were detected on a dedicated seizure protocol MRI. The diagnostic yield of EEG was 31%. Abnormal MRI and EEG were concordant in 18% of patients, with EEG being normal in 37% of patients with epileptogenic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MRI detects epileptogenic lesions in almost one half who presented with new-onset seizures and of these, more than third of them were detected using a “dedicated seizure protocol.” While almost 50% with seizures will have a cause identified on MRI, the sensitivity can be substantially improved by utilizing a dedicated seizure protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6251247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62512472018-12-13 Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries? Ponnatapura, Janardhana Vemanna, Suresh Ballal, Sandeep Singla, Avisha J Clin Imaging Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the current imaging tool of choice in the investigation of patients with seizures. The advent of high-resolution MRI with a dedicated seizure protocol has significantly increased the chances of identifying a cause, resulting in a positive clinical impact on the management of these patients. AIMS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of standard MRI, identify whether there is an increase in the diagnostic yield with the addition of dedicated seizure protocol, and compare the diagnostic yields of MRI and electroencephalogram (EEG) individually and in combination. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study of 129 consecutive patients who presented with new-onset seizures over an 18-month period. The MRI scans performed on 1.5T were reviewed for their diagnostic yield and their association with abnormal electrical activity on EEG. Chi-square test of significance (P < 0.05) was used to test for the difference in proportion. The correlation between MRI brain and EEG was studied using McNemer test. RESULTS: MRI detected potentially epileptogenic lesions in 59 patients (47%). The frequency of epileptogenic lesions was highest in patients who had focal-onset seizures (81%). The most common lesion type was infection and inflammation (28%), with neurocysticercosis being the most common, followed by mesial temporal sclerosis, ischemia, and tumor. About 37% of epileptogenic lesions were missed by standard protocol, which were detected on a dedicated seizure protocol MRI. The diagnostic yield of EEG was 31%. Abnormal MRI and EEG were concordant in 18% of patients, with EEG being normal in 37% of patients with epileptogenic lesions. CONCLUSIONS: MRI detects epileptogenic lesions in almost one half who presented with new-onset seizures and of these, more than third of them were detected using a “dedicated seizure protocol.” While almost 50% with seizures will have a cause identified on MRI, the sensitivity can be substantially improved by utilizing a dedicated seizure protocol. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6251247/ /pubmed/30546927 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_38_18 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Journal of Clinical Imaging Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ponnatapura, Janardhana
Vemanna, Suresh
Ballal, Sandeep
Singla, Avisha
Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title_full Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title_fullStr Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title_full_unstemmed Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title_short Utility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Brain Epilepsy Protocol in New-Onset Seizures: How is it Different in Developing Countries?
title_sort utility of magnetic resonance imaging brain epilepsy protocol in new-onset seizures: how is it different in developing countries?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30546927
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcis.JCIS_38_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ponnatapurajanardhana utilityofmagneticresonanceimagingbrainepilepsyprotocolinnewonsetseizureshowisitdifferentindevelopingcountries
AT vemannasuresh utilityofmagneticresonanceimagingbrainepilepsyprotocolinnewonsetseizureshowisitdifferentindevelopingcountries
AT ballalsandeep utilityofmagneticresonanceimagingbrainepilepsyprotocolinnewonsetseizureshowisitdifferentindevelopingcountries
AT singlaavisha utilityofmagneticresonanceimagingbrainepilepsyprotocolinnewonsetseizureshowisitdifferentindevelopingcountries