Cargando…
Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review
Transgingival (flapless) implant placement procedure is a minimally invasive surgical technique in which implant is placed without reflecting mucoperiosteal flap and hence the blood supply of bone is not hampered which is advantageous in many ways. To compare the outcomes of various implant placemen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30546223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_52_17 |
_version_ | 1783373095244922880 |
---|---|
author | Yadav, Manoj Kumar Verma, Umesh Pratap Parikh, Harshil Dixit, Manisha |
author_facet | Yadav, Manoj Kumar Verma, Umesh Pratap Parikh, Harshil Dixit, Manisha |
author_sort | Yadav, Manoj Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transgingival (flapless) implant placement procedure is a minimally invasive surgical technique in which implant is placed without reflecting mucoperiosteal flap and hence the blood supply of bone is not hampered which is advantageous in many ways. To compare the outcomes of various implant placement techniques, an electronic database of various journals from January 1990 to March 2017 were analyzed and only human clinical trials with 6 months follow-up and at least five implants in each group were reviewed. The present literature review focuses on the comparative aspects of flapped versus flapless implants in terms of their survival, marginal bone loss, soft-tissue parameters, and patient-centered outcomes. When the proper protocol is followed by experienced surgeons, no significant difference was observed in survival rate, marginal bone loss, and keratinized mucosal width between flapless and conventional flap technique. Although transgingival approach for implant placement is reported to significantly reduce the surgical time, increased patient comfort and acceptance, i.e. the patient centered outcomes such as postoperative pain, swelling, and visual analog score, are minimized. Hence, it is concluded that transgingival (flapless) implant placement technique is well accepted by the patient with potential outcomes as compared to the conventional implant placement approach. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6251296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62512962018-12-13 Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review Yadav, Manoj Kumar Verma, Umesh Pratap Parikh, Harshil Dixit, Manisha Natl J Maxillofac Surg Review Article Transgingival (flapless) implant placement procedure is a minimally invasive surgical technique in which implant is placed without reflecting mucoperiosteal flap and hence the blood supply of bone is not hampered which is advantageous in many ways. To compare the outcomes of various implant placement techniques, an electronic database of various journals from January 1990 to March 2017 were analyzed and only human clinical trials with 6 months follow-up and at least five implants in each group were reviewed. The present literature review focuses on the comparative aspects of flapped versus flapless implants in terms of their survival, marginal bone loss, soft-tissue parameters, and patient-centered outcomes. When the proper protocol is followed by experienced surgeons, no significant difference was observed in survival rate, marginal bone loss, and keratinized mucosal width between flapless and conventional flap technique. Although transgingival approach for implant placement is reported to significantly reduce the surgical time, increased patient comfort and acceptance, i.e. the patient centered outcomes such as postoperative pain, swelling, and visual analog score, are minimized. Hence, it is concluded that transgingival (flapless) implant placement technique is well accepted by the patient with potential outcomes as compared to the conventional implant placement approach. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC6251296/ /pubmed/30546223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_52_17 Text en Copyright: © 2018 National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Yadav, Manoj Kumar Verma, Umesh Pratap Parikh, Harshil Dixit, Manisha Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title | Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title_full | Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title_fullStr | Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title_short | Minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: A literature review |
title_sort | minimally invasive transgingival implant therapy: a literature review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30546223 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_52_17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yadavmanojkumar minimallyinvasivetransgingivalimplanttherapyaliteraturereview AT vermaumeshpratap minimallyinvasivetransgingivalimplanttherapyaliteraturereview AT parikhharshil minimallyinvasivetransgingivalimplanttherapyaliteraturereview AT dixitmanisha minimallyinvasivetransgingivalimplanttherapyaliteraturereview |