Cargando…

Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)

PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to compare acute and late toxicities between low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) (110 Gy) in combination with 45 Gy in 25 fractions external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and LDR-BT (160 Gy) alone for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mukai, Yuki, Hayashi, Narihiko, Koike, Izumi, Kaizu, Hisashi, Takano, Shoko, Sugiura, Madoka, Ito, Eiko, Sato, Mizuki, Uemura, Hiroji, Yao, Masahiro, Hata, Masaharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479615
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.79379
_version_ 1783373125457543168
author Mukai, Yuki
Hayashi, Narihiko
Koike, Izumi
Kaizu, Hisashi
Takano, Shoko
Sugiura, Madoka
Ito, Eiko
Sato, Mizuki
Uemura, Hiroji
Yao, Masahiro
Hata, Masaharu
author_facet Mukai, Yuki
Hayashi, Narihiko
Koike, Izumi
Kaizu, Hisashi
Takano, Shoko
Sugiura, Madoka
Ito, Eiko
Sato, Mizuki
Uemura, Hiroji
Yao, Masahiro
Hata, Masaharu
author_sort Mukai, Yuki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to compare acute and late toxicities between low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) (110 Gy) in combination with 45 Gy in 25 fractions external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and LDR-BT (160 Gy) alone for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred five consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated from May 2014 to May 2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. Sixty patients received combination therapy and 45 patients received BT monotherapy. The LDR-BT procedure was performed using (125)I seeds. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 28 months in both groups. Three-year effect rates were overall survival: 100% in both groups. The biochemical failure rate was 2.3% in the combination group and 0% in the monotherapy group (p = 0.373). No patients died during the study period. In both groups, almost all the patients experienced acute urethritis. There was a significant difference between the combination therapy group (8.3%) and BT monotherapy group (11.1%) in late genitourinary (GU) toxicities ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.035). Only 2 patients (3.3%) in the combination therapy group developed late ≥ grade 2 rectal hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between two groups in hematuria ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.068) or rectal hemorrhage ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.206). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to compare the GU and gastrointestinal toxicities between the combination therapy and BT monotherapy (160 Gy) for localized prostate cancer. Unexpectedly, there were more late GU toxicities (except for hematuria) in the BT monotherapy group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6251450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62514502018-11-26 Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy) Mukai, Yuki Hayashi, Narihiko Koike, Izumi Kaizu, Hisashi Takano, Shoko Sugiura, Madoka Ito, Eiko Sato, Mizuki Uemura, Hiroji Yao, Masahiro Hata, Masaharu J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper PURPOSE: The aim of this analysis was to compare acute and late toxicities between low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) (110 Gy) in combination with 45 Gy in 25 fractions external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and LDR-BT (160 Gy) alone for localized prostate cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred five consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer treated from May 2014 to May 2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. Sixty patients received combination therapy and 45 patients received BT monotherapy. The LDR-BT procedure was performed using (125)I seeds. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 28 months in both groups. Three-year effect rates were overall survival: 100% in both groups. The biochemical failure rate was 2.3% in the combination group and 0% in the monotherapy group (p = 0.373). No patients died during the study period. In both groups, almost all the patients experienced acute urethritis. There was a significant difference between the combination therapy group (8.3%) and BT monotherapy group (11.1%) in late genitourinary (GU) toxicities ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.035). Only 2 patients (3.3%) in the combination therapy group developed late ≥ grade 2 rectal hemorrhage. There were no significant differences between two groups in hematuria ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.068) or rectal hemorrhage ≥ grade 2 (p = 0.206). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to compare the GU and gastrointestinal toxicities between the combination therapy and BT monotherapy (160 Gy) for localized prostate cancer. Unexpectedly, there were more late GU toxicities (except for hematuria) in the BT monotherapy group. Termedia Publishing House 2018-10-31 2018-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6251450/ /pubmed/30479615 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.79379 Text en Copyright: © 2018 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Mukai, Yuki
Hayashi, Narihiko
Koike, Izumi
Kaizu, Hisashi
Takano, Shoko
Sugiura, Madoka
Ito, Eiko
Sato, Mizuki
Uemura, Hiroji
Yao, Masahiro
Hata, Masaharu
Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title_full Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title_fullStr Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title_full_unstemmed Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title_short Acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)I brachytherapy (110 Gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 Gy)
title_sort acute and late toxicities in localized prostate cancer patients treated with low-dose (125)i brachytherapy (110 gy) in combination with external beam radiation therapy versus brachytherapy alone (160 gy)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30479615
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2018.79379
work_keys_str_mv AT mukaiyuki acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT hayashinarihiko acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT koikeizumi acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT kaizuhisashi acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT takanoshoko acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT sugiuramadoka acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT itoeiko acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT satomizuki acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT uemurahiroji acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT yaomasahiro acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy
AT hatamasaharu acuteandlatetoxicitiesinlocalizedprostatecancerpatientstreatedwithlowdose125ibrachytherapy110gyincombinationwithexternalbeamradiationtherapyversusbrachytherapyalone160gy