Cargando…
Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection
Background and study aims While endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is recommended to be performed ≥ 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis (AP), early (< 4 weeks) interventions are needed in some symptomatic cases. Despite feasibility of early per...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2698 |
_version_ | 1783373143255023616 |
---|---|
author | Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn Yamamoto, Natsuyo Nakai, Yousuke Saito, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Hakuta, Ryunosuke Ishigaki, Kazunaga Takeda, Tsuyoshi Uchino, Rie Takahara, Naminatsu Mizuno, Suguru Kogure, Hirofumi Matsubara, Saburo Tada, Minoru Isayama, Hiroyuki Koike, Kazuhiko |
author_facet | Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn Yamamoto, Natsuyo Nakai, Yousuke Saito, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Hakuta, Ryunosuke Ishigaki, Kazunaga Takeda, Tsuyoshi Uchino, Rie Takahara, Naminatsu Mizuno, Suguru Kogure, Hirofumi Matsubara, Saburo Tada, Minoru Isayama, Hiroyuki Koike, Kazuhiko |
author_sort | Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims While endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is recommended to be performed ≥ 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis (AP), early (< 4 weeks) interventions are needed in some symptomatic cases. Despite feasibility of early percutaneous drainage, there have been few studies about early EUS-guided drainage of PFC. Patients and methods Consecutive patients who received EUS-guided drainage (EUS-PCD) of infected or symptomatic PFC at the University of Tokyo were retrospectively studied. Contraindications for EUS-PCD are lack of encapsulation or adhesion to the gastrointestinal tract. Safety and effectiveness of early vs delayed (≥ 4 weeks) EUS-PCD were compared. Results A total of 35 patients underwent EUS-PCD (12 early and 23 delayed) using 19 large-bore fully-covered metallic stent and 16 plastic stents. The median diameter of PFC was 110 mm (40 – 180) and 122 mm (17 – 250) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Median time from onset of AP to drainage was 23 and 85 days for early and delayed drainage, respectively. The technical success rate of EUS-guided drainage was 100 %. Endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in six early and 16 cases of delayed drainage. The adverse event rate was 25 % (3 bleeding) and 13 % (2 perforations and 1 CO (2) retention) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Two patients died (1 early and 1 delayed) due to multiorgan failure. Conclusion Endoscopic drainage and subsequent necrosectomy of symptomatic PFC within 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis was feasible, given that the collection was encapsulated and attached to the gastrointestinal tract. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6251787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-62517872018-12-01 Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn Yamamoto, Natsuyo Nakai, Yousuke Saito, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Hakuta, Ryunosuke Ishigaki, Kazunaga Takeda, Tsuyoshi Uchino, Rie Takahara, Naminatsu Mizuno, Suguru Kogure, Hirofumi Matsubara, Saburo Tada, Minoru Isayama, Hiroyuki Koike, Kazuhiko Endosc Int Open Background and study aims While endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) is recommended to be performed ≥ 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis (AP), early (< 4 weeks) interventions are needed in some symptomatic cases. Despite feasibility of early percutaneous drainage, there have been few studies about early EUS-guided drainage of PFC. Patients and methods Consecutive patients who received EUS-guided drainage (EUS-PCD) of infected or symptomatic PFC at the University of Tokyo were retrospectively studied. Contraindications for EUS-PCD are lack of encapsulation or adhesion to the gastrointestinal tract. Safety and effectiveness of early vs delayed (≥ 4 weeks) EUS-PCD were compared. Results A total of 35 patients underwent EUS-PCD (12 early and 23 delayed) using 19 large-bore fully-covered metallic stent and 16 plastic stents. The median diameter of PFC was 110 mm (40 – 180) and 122 mm (17 – 250) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Median time from onset of AP to drainage was 23 and 85 days for early and delayed drainage, respectively. The technical success rate of EUS-guided drainage was 100 %. Endoscopic necrosectomy was performed in six early and 16 cases of delayed drainage. The adverse event rate was 25 % (3 bleeding) and 13 % (2 perforations and 1 CO (2) retention) in the early and delayed drainage groups, respectively. Two patients died (1 early and 1 delayed) due to multiorgan failure. Conclusion Endoscopic drainage and subsequent necrosectomy of symptomatic PFC within 4 weeks after onset of acute pancreatitis was feasible, given that the collection was encapsulated and attached to the gastrointestinal tract. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2018-12 2018-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6251787/ /pubmed/30505932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2698 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Chantarojanasiri, Tanyaporn Yamamoto, Natsuyo Nakai, Yousuke Saito, Tomotaka Saito, Kei Hakuta, Ryunosuke Ishigaki, Kazunaga Takeda, Tsuyoshi Uchino, Rie Takahara, Naminatsu Mizuno, Suguru Kogure, Hirofumi Matsubara, Saburo Tada, Minoru Isayama, Hiroyuki Koike, Kazuhiko Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title | Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title_full | Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title_fullStr | Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title_short | Comparison of early and delayed EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
title_sort | comparison of early and delayed eus-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collection |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30505932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0751-2698 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chantarojanasiritanyaporn comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT yamamotonatsuyo comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT nakaiyousuke comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT saitotomotaka comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT saitokei comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT hakutaryunosuke comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT ishigakikazunaga comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT takedatsuyoshi comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT uchinorie comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT takaharanaminatsu comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT mizunosuguru comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT kogurehirofumi comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT matsubarasaburo comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT tadaminoru comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT isayamahiroyuki comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection AT koikekazuhiko comparisonofearlyanddelayedeusguideddrainageofpancreaticfluidcollection |