Cargando…

Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) both in rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic rehabilitation centers. In addition, we sought to evaluate the practice value of existing screening recommendations of the German Comm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krämer, Judith, Triantafyllias, Konstantinos, Kohnen, Wolfgang, Leber, Martin, Dederichs-Masius, Ute, Zucker, Andrea, Körber, Jürgen, Schwarting, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-018-0116-4
_version_ 1783373157210521600
author Krämer, Judith
Triantafyllias, Konstantinos
Kohnen, Wolfgang
Leber, Martin
Dederichs-Masius, Ute
Zucker, Andrea
Körber, Jürgen
Schwarting, Andreas
author_facet Krämer, Judith
Triantafyllias, Konstantinos
Kohnen, Wolfgang
Leber, Martin
Dederichs-Masius, Ute
Zucker, Andrea
Körber, Jürgen
Schwarting, Andreas
author_sort Krämer, Judith
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) both in rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic rehabilitation centers. In addition, we sought to evaluate the practice value of existing screening recommendations of the German Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO). METHODS: The analysis was performed in four rehabilitation clinics (rheumatology, psychosomatic medicine, oncology, and cardiology) with at least 200 patients per clinic tested for MRSA. RESULTS: Nine (1.1%) of the 842 patients were colonized with MRSA. Only five of them should have been tested according to the commission’s recommendations. The prevalence was 0.5% (n = 207) in rheumatologic, 0.9% (n = 224) in psychosomatic, 1.4% (n = 209) in oncologic and 1.5% (n = 202) in cardiologic patients. We found a greater exposure to risk factors in cardiologic and oncologic patients. Among patients with carrier status, a higher percentage was exposed to three potential risk factors not applied by the commission. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MRSA in our cohort correlates with data from previous studies. The low percentage among rheumatologic patients suggests that they are not more likely to reveal MRSA carrier status than other patient groups and that long-term immunosuppression does not necessarily represent a risk factor for MRSA colonization. Since only five out of nine patients with carrier status would have been detected following the recommendations of the KRINKO, further studies on potential risk factors are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6251847
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-62518472018-12-10 Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status Krämer, Judith Triantafyllias, Konstantinos Kohnen, Wolfgang Leber, Martin Dederichs-Masius, Ute Zucker, Andrea Körber, Jürgen Schwarting, Andreas Rheumatol Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) both in rheumatologic and non-rheumatologic rehabilitation centers. In addition, we sought to evaluate the practice value of existing screening recommendations of the German Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO). METHODS: The analysis was performed in four rehabilitation clinics (rheumatology, psychosomatic medicine, oncology, and cardiology) with at least 200 patients per clinic tested for MRSA. RESULTS: Nine (1.1%) of the 842 patients were colonized with MRSA. Only five of them should have been tested according to the commission’s recommendations. The prevalence was 0.5% (n = 207) in rheumatologic, 0.9% (n = 224) in psychosomatic, 1.4% (n = 209) in oncologic and 1.5% (n = 202) in cardiologic patients. We found a greater exposure to risk factors in cardiologic and oncologic patients. Among patients with carrier status, a higher percentage was exposed to three potential risk factors not applied by the commission. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of MRSA in our cohort correlates with data from previous studies. The low percentage among rheumatologic patients suggests that they are not more likely to reveal MRSA carrier status than other patient groups and that long-term immunosuppression does not necessarily represent a risk factor for MRSA colonization. Since only five out of nine patients with carrier status would have been detected following the recommendations of the KRINKO, further studies on potential risk factors are warranted. Springer Healthcare 2018-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6251847/ /pubmed/29860570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-018-0116-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Krämer, Judith
Triantafyllias, Konstantinos
Kohnen, Wolfgang
Leber, Martin
Dederichs-Masius, Ute
Zucker, Andrea
Körber, Jürgen
Schwarting, Andreas
Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title_full Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title_fullStr Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title_full_unstemmed Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title_short Patients with Rheumatic Diseases do not have an Increased Risk of MRSA Carrier Status
title_sort patients with rheumatic diseases do not have an increased risk of mrsa carrier status
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6251847/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40744-018-0116-4
work_keys_str_mv AT kramerjudith patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT triantafylliaskonstantinos patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT kohnenwolfgang patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT lebermartin patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT dederichsmasiusute patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT zuckerandrea patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT korberjurgen patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus
AT schwartingandreas patientswithrheumaticdiseasesdonothaveanincreasedriskofmrsacarrierstatus